Relationship between the impacted mandibular third molar and adjacent second molar' external root resorption by conebean computed tomography analysi / Relación entre la reabsorción de la raíz externa del tercer molar mandibular impactado y el segundo molar adyacente mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de cono
Cui, Lian-Yan; Jiang, En-Shi; Liu, Zhen-Long; Li, Jing-Xu.
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet)
; 29(1): e27-e35, Ene. 2024. ilus, tab
Artículo
en Inglés
| IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-229185
Background:
The relationship between the impacted mandibular third molar (IMTM) and the external root re-sorption (ERR) of the mandibular second molar (MSM) was analysed with cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT). The risk factors affecting the ERR of the MSM were examined to provide a reference.Material andMethods:
A total of 327 patients (total 578 teeth) admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of YanbianUniversity for IMTM extraction from January 2017 to December 2019 was chosen and divided according togender and age. The correlation between the IMTM and ERR of MSM was analysed, including inclination angle,impaction direction and depth. The relationship of mandibular ascending ramus classification with ERR of MSMwas also analysed. In addition, the correlation between the MTM impaction type and the severity of ERR wasanalysed.Results:
The incidence of ERR of MSM in male patients was higher than in females (27.9% vs.17.6%, p = 0.018).The occurrence and the site of ERR showed statistical differences in the inclination angle [(≤20°, 3.6%) vs. (21°-40°, 27.1%) vs. (41°-60°, 27.6%) vs. (61°-80°, 25.6%) vs. (>80°, 31.7%), p <0.001], impaction direction [(Vertical,1.1%) vs. (Mesial, 32.7%) vs. (Horizontal, 25.3%), p <0.001] and depth of MTM [(Low position, 38.6%) vs. (Medi-an position, 32.0%) vs. (High position, 13.7%), p <0.001]. Also, there was a significant difference in the mandib-ular ascending ramus type [(Class I, 17.4%) vs. (Class II, 32.3%) vs. (Class III, 44.9%), p <0.001]. In addition, theseverity of ERR showed statistical differences in the mesial (40.9%, p<0.05), lower impaction (54.5%, p<0.05)depth of MTM and type III of mandibular ascending ramus (63.6%, p<0.05).Conclusions:
The inclination angle, impaction direction, and depth of MTM were the influencing factors for theoccurrence and site of ERR.(AU)
Biblioteca responsable:
ES1.1
Ubicación: ES15.1 - BNCS
Texto completo
Documentos relacionados