Artículo
en Inglés
| IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-229533
Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the primary treatment options for localised prostate cancer (PCa). Despite its curativeintent, 1/3 of patientswill experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) during follow-up. Experts have devoted efforts to associatethe influence of each individual factor with the risk of BCR to select the optimal treatment for each patient. Optimal managementmust aim to find a balance between delaying the onset of metastatic disease and overtreating an indolent disease with treatmentsthat can affectquality of life of the patients. Thus far, effective treatment options for men with BCR remain controversial interms of ideal treatment timing (adjuvant vs. salvage), radiotherapy (RT) fields and doses, selection and duration of systemictherapy and potential synergies between treatments and their therapeutic sequencing. Next-generation imaging techniques, suchas Prostate-Specific MembraneAntigenPositron Emission Tomography, are used for early detection of disease progression andexact site of recurrence or progression, thereby enhancing decision making for futuredisease management. In this review, weevaluate available evidence of controversial topics regarding BCR after RP and explore future directions, such as prognosticand/or predictive factors of response, genetic panels, second-generation hormonetreatments, ultra-hypofractionated RT andongoing clinical trials in this clinical scenario. (AU)