OBJECTIVES:
The objectives of this study are to compare the
sensitivity and specificity of three diagnostic tools fordelirium (the
Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist, the
Confusion Assessment
Method for
Intensive Care Unitsand the
Confusion Assessment
Method for
Intensive Care Units Flowsheet) in a mixed
population of critically illpatients, and to validate the Brazilian Portuguese
Confusion Assessment
Method for
Intensive Care Units.
METHODS:
The study was conducted in four
intensive care units in
Brazil.
Patients were screened for
delirium by apsychiatrist or
neurologist using the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Patients weresubsequently screened by an intensivist using Portuguese
translations of the three tools.
RESULTS:
One hundred and nineteen
patients were evaluated and 38.6% were diagnosed with
delirium by thereference rater. The
Confusion Assessment
Method for
Intensive Care Units had a
sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificityof 96.2%; the
Confusion Assessment
Method for
Intensive Care Units Flowsheet had a
sensitivity of 72.5% and aspecificity of 96.2%; the
Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist had a
sensitivity of 96.0% and a
specificity of72.4%. There was strong agreement between the
Confusion Assessment
Method for
Intensive Care Units and theConfusion Assessment
Method for
Intensive Care Units Flowsheet (kappa coefficient = 0.96).
CONCLUSION:
All three instruments are effective diagnostic tools in
critically ill intensive care unit patients. Inaddition, the Brazilian Portuguese version of the
Confusion Assessment
Method for
Intensive Care Units is a validand reliable instrument for the assessment of
delirium among
critically ill patients.(AU)