A Comparative Analysis of Endoscopic Versus Conventional Open Thyroidectomy in the Treatment of Papillary Thyroid Cancer According to Preoperative Risk Stratification / 대한내분비외과학회지
Between May 2009 and April 2012, 197 patients underwent either a conventional open or an endoscopic thyroidectomy with the preoperative consideration of risk group using clinical parameters of AMES system (patient age, size of tumor, extrathyroid extension, and presence of distant metastasis). A retrospective analysis of the pathologic data according to AMES system after surgery was also conducted. The endoscopic thyroidectomy was performed using the BABA (bilateral axillo-breast approach) method.
RESULTS:
Based on the method of operation, the low-risk group patients (n=197) were divided into two groups endoscopic group (n=78) and open group (n=119). Proceduretime, postoperative complication rates, and length of hospital stay were tracked, albeit these were not significantly different between the two groups. From the pathologic findings, it was reported that there were no significant differences in tumor size, extrathyroid extension, and metastasis and also in the Off T4 – thyroglobulin level between the two groups.