Computed Tomography Urography: Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose between Single- and Split-Bolus Techniques
John-Nathan GIFFORD; Mei-Choo CHONG; Le-Roy CHONG; Shih-Zhu YIIN; Jeffrey-Kk FONG; Wey-Chyi TEOH; John-Nathan GIFFORD; Mei-Choo CHONG; Le-Roy CHONG; Shih-Zhu YIIN; Jeffrey-Kk FONG; Wey-Chyi TEOH.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
; : 278-284, 2018.
Artículo
en Inglés
| WPRIM | ID: wpr-690030
<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>In this study, we aimed to compare the split-bolus and single-bolus computerised tomography (CT) urography and determine if this offers a reduction in radiation dose without compromising image quality.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>A retrospective evaluation was performed on 88 patients undergoing split-bolus CT urography and this was compared to a control group of 101 consecutive patients undergoing single-bolus CT urography. A radiation dose analysis was performed on each subject. Subjects with urinary bladder lesions, hydronephrosis, renal masses or cysts >3 cm in diameter were excluded. All images were classified according to image quality by 2 consultant radiologists.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Opacification of the renal parenchyma, pelvicalyceal system, proximal ureters and urinary bladder were comparable between the 2 techniques, whilst image quality of the middle and distal third of the ureters was better using the split-bolus technique. The mean dose length product (DLP) for the single-bolus technique was 1324.1 mGy-cm, whilst that of the split-bolus technique was 885.7 mGy-cm. The mean effective dose reduction was calculated to be 31.1% between the 2 groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The split-bolus technique gives a reduced radiation dose without compromising image quality. The associated reduction in images is beneficial for data storage and reporting efficiency. As such, our department will adopt the split-bolus technique for young, low-risk patients.</p>
Biblioteca responsable:
WPRO
Texto completo
Documentos relacionados