This was a prospective, randomized, crossover-designed simulation study using an imitation arm with an intravascular line. We compared the two methods in terms of total execution time, total number of button clicks, and subjective difficulty using a numerical rating scale with a score from 0 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult).
RESULTS:
Twenty-two nurses successfully performed both interventions according to the allocated sequence. Total execution times did not differ between the two methods (129.5 ± 23.2 seconds for the conventional method vs. 121.2 ± 24.3 seconds for the Anyfusion® method; P = 0.244), although the total number of clicks was significantly fewer using the Anyfusion® than the conventional method (median [interquartile range] 10.0 [9.0–12.0] vs. 21.0 [20.0–25.0], respectively; P < 0.001). Participants rated the Anyfusion® method as easier than the conventional method (1.7 ± 1.2 vs. 3.6 ± 1.6; P < 0.001, respectively).