Your browser doesn't support javascript.

Biblioteca Virtual en Salud

Hipertensión

Home > Búsqueda > ()
XML
Imprimir Exportar

Formato de exportación:

Exportar

Email
Adicionar mas contactos
| |

Comparison of postoperative immune function between da Vinci robot-assisted and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with non-small cell lung cancer / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

Jialong XUE; Wei XU; Xingchi LIU; Bo LIU; Shiguang XU; Boxiao HU; Xiaokang GONG; Xu LI; Shumin WANG.
Artículo en Zh | WPRIM | ID: wpr-881215
@#Objective    To compare the effect on postoperative immune function between da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) , and to provide clinical support for more effective surgical procedures. Methods    A total of 90 patients undergoing radical resection of pulmonary carcinoma in our hospital from June to November 2019 were included. There were 49 males and 41 females with an average age of 62.67 (37-84) years. Among them, 50 patients underwent da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (a RATS group) and 40 patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (a VATS group). The perioperative indexes as well as postoperative inflammatory factors and immune level effects between the two groups were compared. Results    Compared with the VATS, RATS could significantly shorten the operation time and decrease intraoperative blood loss (P<0.05). RATS also effectively reduced the increase of postoperative inflammatory factor level (P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in postoperative immune function between the RATS group and the VATS group (P>0.05). Conclusion    RATS is superior to VATS in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in perioperative indicators and inflammatory factors.
Biblioteca responsable: WPRO