Aortitis: una causa de dolor torácico agudo poco común / Aortitis: an unusual cause of acute chest pain

No disponible

Real incidence of diabetes mellitus in a coronary disease population.

The high prevalence of unknown diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with coronary disease and that the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is the best diagnostic method in this context are well known. However, data about the incidence of DM in this population have not been well described. In the present study, we sought to determine the actual incidence of new-onset DM in patients with coronary disease using the OGTT. Our secondary objective was to validate a predictive model. We studied a series of 338 patients with coronary disease without known DM using the OGTT. After the OGTT, the patients were reclassified as normoglycemic, prediabetic, and unknown DM, according to the American Diabetes Association 2010 criteria. After 3 years of follow-up, the patients without DM were again reassessed using the OGTT. We then built a predictive model using the multivariate logistic regression method and validated it using the leave-one-out method. The final sample was 191 patients. The mean follow-up was 3.13 years. The overall incidence of DM was 43.6 cases/1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.8 to 60.4). The incidence was significantly different between the initially normoglycemic patients (11.5%, 95% CI 2.3% to 31.8%) and the prediabetic patients (70.5%, 95% CI 42.7% to 98.3%; p <0.001). A risk model that included the glucose level 2 hours after challenge, glycosylated hemoglobin and triglyceride levels, and presence of noncoronary vascular disease showed good predictive capacity for incident DM (area under the curve 0.882, 95% CI 0.819 to 0.946; p <0.0001). In conclusion, the real incidence of new DM is very high in the coronary population, especially in those with prediabetes. It is necessary to use the OGTT for diagnosis, but we can optimize its indication using a risk model.

Cardiogenic shock following administration of propofol and fentanyl in a healthy woman: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiogenic shock is very uncommon in healthy people. The differential diagnosis for patients with acute heart failure in previously healthy hearts includes acute myocardial infarction and myocarditis. However, many drugs can also depress myocardial function. Propofol and fentanyl are frequently used during different medical procedures. The cardiovascular depressive effect of both drugs has been well established, but the development of cardiogenic shock is very rare when these agents are used. CASE PRESENTATION: After a minor surgical intervention, a 32-year-old Caucasian woman with no significant medical history went into sudden hemodynamic deterioration due to acute heart failure. An urgent echocardiogram showed severe biventricular dysfunction and an estimated left ventricular ejection fraction of 20%. Extracorporeal life support and mechanical ventilation were required. Five days later her ventricular function had fully recovered, which allowed the progressive withdrawal of medical treatment. Prior to her hospital discharge, cardiac MRI showed neither edema nor pathological deposits on the delayed contrast enhancement sequences. At her six-month follow-up examination, the patient was asymptomatic and did not require treatment. CONCLUSION: Although there are many causes of cardiogenic shock, the presence of abrupt hemodynamic deterioration and the absence of a clear cause could be related to the use of propofol and fentanyl.