Disk halo size measured in individuals with monofocal versus diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To compare disk halo size in response to a glare source in eyes with an aspheric apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) or aspheric monofocal IOL. SETTING: Rementeria Ophthalmological Clinic, Madrid, Spain. DESIGN: Prospective randomized masked study. METHOD: Halo radius was measured using a vision monitor (MonCv3) with low-luminance optotypes in eyes that had cataract surgery and bilateral implantion of an Acrysof Restor SN6AD1 multifocal IOL or Acrysof IQ monofocal IOL 6 to 9 months previously. The visual angle subtended by the disk halo radius was calculated in minutes of arc (arcmin). Patient complaints of halo disturbances were recorded. Monocular uncorrected distance visual acutity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were measured using high-contrast (96%) and low-contrast (10%) logMAR letter charts. RESULTS: The study comprised 39 eyes of 39 subjects (aged 70 to 80 years); 21 eyes had a multifocal IOL and 18 eyes a monofocal IOL. The mean halo radius was 35 arcmin larger in the multifocal IOL group than the monofocal group (P < .05). Greater halo effects were reported in the multifocal IOL group (P < .05). The mean monocular high-contrast UDVA and low-contrast UDVA did not vary significantly between groups, whereas the mean monocular high-contrast CDVA and low-contrast CDVA were significantly worse at 0.12 logMAR and 0.13 logMAR in the multifocal than in the monofocal IOL group, respectively (P < .01). A significant positive correlation was detected by multiple linear regression between the halo radius and low-contrast UDVA in the multifocal IOL group (r = 0.72, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The diffractive multifocal IOL gave rise to a larger disk halo size, which was correlated with a worse low-contrast UDVA. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Fiabilidad en el cribado de la retinopatía del prematuro mediante el análisis de retinografías / Reliability of retinal imaging screening in retinopathy of prematurity

INTRODUCCIÓN: La retinopatía del prematuro (ROP) es una de las principales causas de ceguera infantil potencialmente evitable. Los avances en los cuidados neonatales consiguen la supervivencia de niños de bajo peso extremo asociado con una mayor incidencia de la enfermedad. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la fiabilidad en el diagnóstico de la ROP a través de retinografías obtenidas con la cámara de campo amplio RetCam3 y estudiar la variabilidad en el diagnóstico de ROP en función del evaluador. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: El examen con oftalmoscopio indirecto fue realizado por un oftalmólogo pediátrico experto en ROP. Las imágenes retinianas fueron obtenidas por el mismo oftalmólogo y un técnico especializado en la captura de imágenes digitales. Un total de 30sets de imágenes fueron analizados por 3 grupos enmascarados: grupo A (8 oftalmólogos), grupo B (5 expertos en visión) y grupo C (2 oftalmólogos expertos en ROP). RESULTADOS: Acorde con el diagnóstico mediante oftalmoscopia indirecta, la sensibilidad (26-93), el índice Kappa (0,24-0,80) y el porcentaje de aciertos fueron estadísticamente significativos en el grupo C para el diagnóstico de ROP tipo1. En el diagnóstico de ROP tipo1+tipo2 el índice Kappa (0,17-0,33) y el porcentaje de aciertos (58-90) fueron estadísticamente significativos, obteniendo valores superiores en el grupo C. CONCLUSIONES: El diagnóstico realizado por oftalmólogos expertos en ROP con el retinógrafo móvil RetCam3 ha demostrado ser un método fiable

INTRODUCTION: The retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a potentially avoidable cause of blindness in children. The advances in neonatal care make the survival of extremely premature infants, who show a greater incidence of the disease, possible. The aim of the study is to evaluate the reliability of ROP screening using retinography imaging with the RetCam3 wide-angle camera and also study the variability of ROP diagnosis depending on the evaluator. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The indirect ophthalmoscopy exam was performed by a Pediatric ROP-Expert Ophthalmologist. The same ophthalmologist and a technician specialized in digital image capture took retinal images using the RetCam3 wide-angle camera. A total of 30image sets were analyzed by 3 masked groups: group A (8 ophthalmologists), group B (5 experts in vision), and group C (2 ROP-expert ophthalmologists). RESULTS: According to the diagnosis using indirect ophthalmoscopy, the sensitivity (26-93), Kappa (0.24-0.80), and the percent agreement were statistically significant in group C for the diagnosis of ROP Type1. In the diagnosis of ROP Type1+Type2, Kappa (0.17-0.33) and the percent agreement (58-90) were statistically significant, with higher values in group C. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis, carried out by ROP-expert ophthalmologists, using the wide-angle camera RetCam3 has proved to be a reliable method

Espesor macular medido con tomografía de coherencia óptica en ojos pseudoafáquicos con implante amarillo vs. transparente / Macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in pseudoaphakic eyes with clear vs yellow implant

OBJETIVO: Evaluar mediante tomografía de coherencia óptica (OCT) las variaciones de espesor macular producidas a lo largo del tiempo en ojos pseudoafáquicos implantados con una lente intraocular (LIO) transparente en comparación con sus respectivos ojos contralarerales implantados con LIO amarilla. MÉTODOS: El espesor macular de 36 ojos de 18 sujetos fue evaluado mediante OCT. Los sujetos presentaban edades superiores a 65 años y habían sido intervenidos de cataratas en ambos ojos en 2 cirugías independientes. La principal característica de los individuos es que llevaban implantada una LIO con diferente absorción en cada ojo: transparente (absorbente de la radiación ultravioleta) y amarilla (con filtro adicional absorbente de las radiaciones violeta-azul del espectro visible). El espesor macular se evaluó en 2 sesiones separadas en el tiempo por un intervalo de tiempo de 5 años, mediante el sistema Stratus-OCT (protocolo fast macular thickness). Se analizaron estadísticamente las diferencias en la evolución del espesor macular entre ojos con diferente tipo de LIO. RESULTADOS: Tras 5 años de seguimiento, se observó que los ojos implantados con LIO transparente manifestaban una reducción del espesor macular estadísticamente significativa, superior a la esperada por el aumento de la edad. Sin embargo, los ojos implantados con LIOs amarillas mantuvieron su espesor macular estable. La disminución del espesor macular promedio en ojos implantados con LIO transparente fue de 5 ± 8 μm (p = 0,02) y la reducción del espesor foveal fue de 10 ± 17 μm (p = 0,02). CONCLUSIONES: Los cambios de espesor macular producidos en ojos implantados con una LIO amarilla difieren de los cambios manifestados en ojos con LIO transparente. Estas observaciones apuntan a un posible efecto protector de las LIOs amarillas contra los efectos dañinos de la luz en sujetos pseudoafáquicos. Sin embargo, estudios con un mayor tamaño muestral y mayor tiempo de seguimiento son necesarios para confirmar que la protección inducida por este tipo de LIO es clínicamente significativa

OBJECTIVE: To study the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT), for measuring the macular thickness variations produced over time in elderly pseudophakic subjects implanted with a clear intraocular lens (IOL) in one eye, and a yellow IOL in the other eye. METHODS: Macular thickness measurements were obtained in the 36 eyes of 18 subjects over 65 years, with cataracts surgically removed from both eyes and implanted with different absorbance (clear and yellow) IOLs in 2 separate surgeries. Stratus-OCT was used to determine the macular thickness in 2 sessions with 5 years of difference. RESULTS: After 5 years of follow-up, the eyes implanted with clear IOLs revealed a significant decrease in macular thickness. However, in eyes implanted with yellow IOLs the macular thickness remained stable. The mean overall decrease in macular thickness in eyes implanted with clear IOLs was 5 ± 8 μm (P=0.02), and foveal thickness reduction was 10 ± 17 μm (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The macular thickness changes produced in eyes implanted with a yellow IOL differ from those with a clear IOL. These observation point to a possible protective effect of yellow IOL against the harmful effects of light in elderly pseudophakic subjects. However, studies with a longer follow-up are still needed to confirm that the protection provided by this IOL model is clinically significant

[Macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in pseudoaphakic eyes with clear vs yellow implant]. / Espesor macular medido con tomografía de coherencia óptica en ojos pseudoafáquicos con implante amarillo vs. transparente.

OBJECTIVE: To study the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT), for measuring the macular thickness variations produced over time in elderly pseudophakic subjects implanted with a clear intraocular lens (IOL) in one eye, and a yellow IOL in the other eye. METHODS: Macular thickness measurements were obtained in the 36 eyes of 18 subjects over 65 years, with cataracts surgically removed from both eyes and implanted with different absorbance (clear and yellow) IOLs in 2 separate surgeries. Stratus-OCT was used to determine the macular thickness in 2 sessions with 5 years of difference. RESULTS: After 5 years of follow-up, the eyes implanted with clear IOLs revealed a significant decrease in macular thickness. However, in eyes implanted with yellow IOLs the macular thickness remained stable. The mean overall decrease in macular thickness in eyes implanted with clear IOLs was 5 ± 8 µm (P=.02), and foveal thickness reduction was 10 ± 17 µm (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: The macular thickness changes produced in eyes implanted with a yellow IOL differ from those with a clear IOL. These observation point to a possible protective effect of yellow IOL against the harmful effects of light in elderly pseudophakic subjects. However, studies with a longer follow-up are still needed to confirm that the protection provided by this IOL model is clinically significant.

[Reliability of retinal imaging screening in retinopathy of prematurity]. / Fiabilidad en el cribado de la retinopatía del prematuro mediante el análisis de retinografías.

INTRODUCTION: The retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a potentially avoidable cause of blindness in children. The advances in neonatal care make the survival of extremely premature infants, who show a greater incidence of the disease, possible. The aim of the study is to evaluate the reliability of ROP screening using retinography imaging with the RetCam 3 wide-angle camera and also study the variability of ROP diagnosis depending on the evaluator. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The indirect ophthalmoscopy exam was performed by a Pediatric ROP-Expert Ophthalmologist. The same ophthalmologist and a technician specialized in digital image capture took retinal images using the RetCam 3 wide-angle camera. A total of 30 image sets were analyzed by 3 masked groups: group A (8 ophthalmologists), group B (5 experts in vision), and group C (2 ROP-expert ophthalmologists). RESULTS: According to the diagnosis using indirect ophthalmoscopy, the sensitivity (26-93), Kappa (0.24-0.80), and the percent agreement were statistically significant in group C for the diagnosis of ROP Type 1. In the diagnosis of ROP Type 1+Type 2, Kappa (0.17-0.33) and the percent agreement (58-90) were statistically significant, with higher values in group C. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis, carried out by ROP-expert ophthalmologists, using the wide-angle camera RetCam 3 has proved to be a reliable method.