Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 2024 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38856725

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess a systematic implementation approach for introducing dapagliflozin to individuals with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in an outpatient clinical setting. METHODS: Retrospective medical record data were analysed. All individuals diagnosed with heart failure who resided within the hospital catchment area and had visited cardiology or internal medicine department between 2010 and 2019 were screened by using the main inclusion criteria from the DAPA-HF trial. The effectiveness of the previously described seven-step systematic implementation approach was assessed by the proportion receiving information letter, dapagliflozin treatment, follow-ups at 2-12 weeks and 12 months post-dapagliflozin initiation, persistence on dapagliflozin, adverse events, and reasons for discontinuation. RESULTS: Of the 2433 individuals, 352 met the main DAPA-HF trial criteria in step 2. After exclusions in steps 3 and 4, 191 individuals remained. Of these, 158 were invited for eligibility discussion in step 5, with 107 having received an information letter beforehand. In step 6, dapagliflozin was prescribed to 69 individuals, and in step 7, follow-ups were conducted with 56 individuals at 2-12 weeks and 62 individuals at 12 months. Sixty out of 69 persisted on dapagliflozin after 12 months. Adverse events were reported by nine individuals. Discontinuation was attributed to reasons such as urinary tract infections, genital or abdominal discomfort, and hypotension. CONCLUSION: The systematic introduction of dapagliflozin to heart failure patients was effective. Despite this, challenges in uniformly implementing procedures across patients were evident, emphasizing the necessity for a systematic implementation approach.

2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38170563

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients newly (< six months) diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) with those who have had the diagnosis longer (≥ six months) and to investigate whether or not these outcomes change over a six month's period. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this longitudinal survey study, 129 patients with AF completed the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Arrhythmia-Specific questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at baseline and after six months.At baseline, patients newly diagnosed with AF (n=53), compared to patients with a previous diagnosis (n=76), reported AF as more temporary (P = 0.003) and had higher belief in personal- and treatment control (P = 0.004, P = 0.041 respectively). At six months follow-up, patients newly diagnosed reported a lower symptom burden (P = 0.004), better health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (P = 0.015) and higher personal control (P < 0.001) than patients previously diagnosed. Over time, in patients newly diagnosed, symptom burden and anxiety symptom score decreased (P = 0.001, P = 0.014 respectively) and HRQoL improved (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients newly diagnosed with AF reported more positive PROs both at baseline and at six months follow-up than patients with a previous diagnosis of AF. Therefore, it is important to quickly capture patients newly diagnosed to support their belief in their own abilities. Such support may, alongside medical treatments, help the patients manage the disease, which may lead to reduced symptom burden and better HRQoL over time.

3.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being ; 19(1): 2294512, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38112175

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the process of becoming aware of and acting on personal cardiovascular (CVD) risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHOD: A purposive sample of 14 persons living with T2D participated in semi-structured, open-ended, in-dept interviews. The interviews were analysed with grounded theory. RESULT: The analysis identified the core category "Balancing emotions, integrating knowledge and understanding to achieve risk awareness and act on it." Five categories describe the movement from not being aware of the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) to becoming aware of this risk and taking action to reduce it. Persons with T2D need to transform their knowledge and experience of CVD risk and incorporate it in their individual situations. Emotional and existential experiences of CVD risk can lead to awareness about the severity of the condition and contribute to increased motivation for self-management. However, an overly high emotional response can be overwhelming and may result in insufficient self-management. CONCLUSION: Persons with T2D seemed not to fully grasp their increased risk of CVD or recognize that self-management activities were aimed at reducing this risk. However, their awareness of CVD risk gradually increased as they came to understand the severity of T2D and became more emotionally and existentially engaged.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Self-Management , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/psychology , Risk Factors , Heart Disease Risk Factors
4.
J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 38(2): 150-157, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36156094

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported symptoms of acute myocardial infarction (MI) may be affected by recall bias depending on when and where symptoms are assessed. AIM: The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of patients' symptom description in more detail before and within 24 hours after a confirmed MI diagnosis. METHODS: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used to examine symptoms described in calls between the tele-nurse and the patient compared with symptoms selected by the patient from a questionnaire less than 24 hours after hospital admission. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed separately and then merged into a final interpretation. RESULTS: Thirty patients (median age, 67.5 years; 20 men) were included. Chest pain was the most commonly reported symptom in questionnaires (24/30). Likewise, in 19 of 30 calls, chest pain was the first complaint mentioned, usually described together with the symptom onset. Expressions used to describe symptom quality were pain, pressure, discomfort, ache, cramp, tension, and soreness. Associated symptoms commonly described were pain or numbness in the arms, cold sweat, dyspnea, weakness, and nausea. Bodily sensations, such as feeling unwell or weak, were also described. Fear and tiredness were described in calls significantly less often than reported in questionnaires ( P = .01 and P = .02), whereas "other" symptoms were more often mentioned in calls compared with answers given in the questionnaire ( P = .02). Some symptoms expressed in the calls were not listed in the questionnaire, which expands the understanding of acute MI symptoms. The results showed no major inconsistencies between datasets. CONCLUSION: Patients' MI symptom descriptions in tele-calls and those reported in questionnaires after diagnosis are comparable and convergent.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Male , Humans , Aged , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Chest Pain/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Nausea , Fatigue
5.
Nurs Open ; 10(3): 1821-1829, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36309946

ABSTRACT

AIM: To explore the experiences of living with symptomatic atrial fibrillation. DESIGN: This study, with a descriptive qualitative design, was performed using semi-structured individual interviews. METHOD: Six women and nine men with symptomatic atrial fibrillation were included. The transcribed interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The COREQ checklist was followed. RESULTS: The analysis resulted in a main theme, namely balancing life and included the themes striving for illness control, becoming a receiver or an active partner in care and dealing with changed self-image. The participants strived to understand their illness, prevent attacks and manage anxiety. Some of the participants were not involved in decision-making, were uninformed about self-care measures, reported a lack of continuity in care and felt that the doctors focused on information about the medical part of care.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Physicians , Male , Humans , Female , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Anxiety , Anxiety Disorders , Adaptation, Psychological
6.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 21(7): 694-701, 2022 10 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35165735

ABSTRACT

AIMS: A short time span from symptom onset to reperfusion is imperative in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to determine factors associated with patient decision time for seeking care in STEMI, particularly how symptoms were experienced and affected patient response. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multicentre cross-sectional self-report survey study was completed at five Swedish hospitals representing geographic diversity. The 521 patients were divided into three groups based on their time to respond to symptoms: early (<20 min), intermediate (20-90 min), and late responders (>90 min). Only one out of five patients both responded early and called an ambulance within 20 min. Believing symptoms were cardiac in origin [odds ratio (OR) 2.60], male sex (OR 2.40), left anterior descending artery as culprit artery (OR 1.77), and bystanders calling an ambulance (OR 4.32) were factors associated with early response and correct action. Associated symptoms such as dyspnoea (OR 1.67) and weakness (OR 1.65) were associated with an early action (<20 min), while chest pain was not independently associated with response time. Cold sweat (OR 0.61) prevented late care-seeking behaviour as did a high symptom burden (OR 0.86). CONCLUSION: Misinterpretation of symptoms delays correct care-seeking behaviour because patient expectations may not be aligned with the experience when stricken by Myocardial infarction. Therefore, it is imperative to continuously enhance public awareness in correct symptom recognition and appropriate care-seeking behaviour and to make efforts to educate individuals at risk for STEMI as well as their next of kin.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Ambulances , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Time Factors
7.
Nurs Open ; 9(6): 2657-2664, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34132062

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to explore patients' experiences of preventive anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation. DESIGN: This was a descriptive qualitative study based on interviews. METHODS: Individual interviews with 15 patients, 6 women and 9 men, treated with preventive oral anticoagulant due to atrial fibrillation, were conducted. The interviews were analysed with qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Based on the analysis, the theme Managing a necessary evil emerged. The theme comprised the three categories: Coping with anxiety and changes in daily life, Having confidence in care and Being a partner or only a receiver of treatment. Patients described it like being faced with a situation where a treatment perceived as vital was weighed against undesirable consequences and risks. Patients trusted caregivers and had confidence in care, but there was a risk of being a receiver of care instead of becoming a partner.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Humans , Male , Female , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/chemically induced , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Blood Coagulation , Qualitative Research , Administration, Oral
8.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 11(2): 89-98, 2022 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34905049

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Data on the prognostic value of frailty to guide clinical decision-making for patients with myocardial infarction (MI) are scarce. To analyse the association between frailty classification, treatment patterns, in-hospital outcomes, and 6-month mortality in a large population of patients with MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: An observational, multicentre study with a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data using the SWEDEHEART registry. In total, 3381 MI patients with a level of frailty assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS-9) were included. Of these patients, 2509 (74.2%) were classified as non-vulnerable non-frail (CFS 1-3), 446 (13.2%) were vulnerable non-frail (CFS 4), and 426 (12.6%) were frail (CFS 5-9). Frailty and non-frail vulnerability were associated with worse in-hospital outcomes compared with non-frailty, i.e. higher rates of mortality (13.4% vs. 4.0% vs. 1.8%), cardiogenic shock (4.7% vs. 2.5% vs. 1.9%), and major bleeding (4.5% vs. 2.7% vs. 1.1%) (all P < 0.001), and less frequent use of evidence-based therapies. In Cox regression analyses, frailty was strongly and independently associated with 6-month mortality compared with non-frailty, after adjustment for age, sex, the GRACE risk score components, and other potential risk factors [hazard ratio (HR) 3.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.30-4.79]. A similar pattern was seen for vulnerable non-frail patients (fully adjusted HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.41-3.02). CONCLUSION: Frailty assessed with the CFS was independently and strongly associated with all-cause 6-month mortality, also after comprehensive adjustment for baseline differences in other risk factors. Similarly, non-frail vulnerability was independently associated with higher mortality compared with those with preserved functional ability.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Myocardial Infarction , Aged , Frail Elderly , Humans , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
9.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 77(1): 125-131, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32820363

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To develop a model for systematic introduction and to test the feasibility in a chronic disease population. We also investigated how the approach was received by the patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The systematic introduction approach is a seven-step procedure: step 1, define a few main criteria; step 2, primary scan patients with the one or two main criteria using computerized medical records/databases/clinical registries; step 3, identify patients applying the other predefined criteria; step 4, evaluate if any examinations/laboratory test updates are required; step 5, summon identified patients to the clinic with an information letter; step 6, discuss treatment with the patient and prescribe if appropriate; and step 7, follow up on initiated therapy and evaluate the applied process. The model was tested in a case study during introduction of the new drug sacubitril-valsartan in a heart failure population. In total, 76 out of 1924 patients were identified to be eligible for sacubitril-valsartan and summoned to the clinic to discuss treatment. Patient experiences with the approach were investigated in an interview study with general inductive approach using qualitative content analysis. This resulted in three final categories: a good approach, role of the information letter, and trust in care. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic introduction approach ensures that strict criteria are used in the selection process and that a treatment can be implemented in eligible patients within a specified population with limited resources and time. The model was effective in our case study and maintained the patient's confidence in healthcare.


Subject(s)
Aminobutyrates/therapeutic use , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Biphenyl Compounds/therapeutic use , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Medication Therapy Management , Models, Theoretical , Valsartan/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Drug Combinations , Drug Substitution , Female , Humans , Male
10.
Nurs Open ; 7(2): 556-562, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32089852

ABSTRACT

Aim: To describe and compare self-reported health-related quality of life between younger and older patients with severe heart failure eligible for treatment with sacubitril-valsartan and to explore the association between health-related quality of life and age, NYHA classification, systolic blood pressure and NT-proBNP level. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A total of 59 patients, eligible for treatment with sacubitril-valsartan were consecutively included and divided into a younger (≤75 years) and older group (>75 years). Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and the EuroQol 5-dimensions. Data were collected between June 2016 and January 2018. The STROBE checklist was used. Results: There were no differences in overall health-related quality of life between the age groups. The older patients reported lower scores in two domains measured with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, namely self-efficacy (67.0 SD 22.1 vs. 78.8 SD 19.7) and physical limitation (75.6 SD 19.0 vs. 86.3 SD 14.4). Higher NYHA class was independently associated with lower Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Quality of Life , Aminobutyrates , Biphenyl Compounds , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Combinations , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Humans , Valsartan
11.
BMJ Support Palliat Care ; 10(1): e9, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28689185

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Patients with severe heart failure (HF) suffer from a high symptom burden and high mortality. European and Swedish guidelines for HF care recommend palliative care for these patients. Different models for integrated palliative care and HF care have been described in the literature. No studies were found that qualitatively evaluated these models. The purpose of this study is to describe patients' experiences of a new model of person-centred integrated HF and palliative care at home. METHOD: Interviews were conducted with 12 patients with severe HF (New York Heart Association class IIIâ€"IV) and included in the research project of Palliative advanced home caRE and heart FailurE caRe (PREFER). Qualitative content analysis was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Two themes and a total of five categories were identified. The first theme was feeling secure and safe through receiving care at home with the categories: having access to readily available care at home, being followed up continuously and having trust in the team members' ability to help. The second theme was being acknowledged as both a person and a patient, with the following two categories: being met as a person, participating in decisions about one's care and receiving help for symptoms of both HF and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Person-centred integrated HF and palliative care provides a secure environment and holistic care for patients with severe HF. This approach is a way to improve the care management in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01304381; Results.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/psychology , Home Care Services , Palliative Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient-Centered Care , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Female , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Palliative Care/methods , Qualitative Research , Sweden
12.
Eur Heart J ; 41(7): 833-843, 2020 02 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31504404

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To describe the time trends of in-hospital and out-of-hospital bleeding parallel to the development of new treatments and ischaemic outcomes over the last 20 years in a nationwide myocardial infarction (MI) population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with acute MI (n = 371 431) enrolled in the SWEDEHEART registry from 1995 until May 2018 were selected and evaluated for in-hospital bleeding and out-of-hospital bleeding events at 1 year. In-hospital bleeding increased from 0.5% to a peak at 2% 2005/2006 and thereafter slightly decreased to a new plateau around 1.3% by the end of the study period. Out-of-hospital bleeding increased in a stepwise fashion from 2.5% to 3.5 % in the middle of the study period and to 4.8% at the end of the study period. The increase in both in-hospital and out-of-hospital bleeding was parallel to increasing use of invasive strategy and adjunctive antithrombotic treatment, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and potent DAPT, while the decrease in in-hospital bleeding from 2007 to 2010 was parallel to implementation of bleeding avoidance strategies. In-hospital re-infarction decreased from 2.8% to 0.6% and out-of-hospital MI decreased from 12.6% to 7.1%. The composite out-of-hospital MI, cardiovascular death, and stroke decreased in a similar fashion from 18.4% to 9.1%. CONCLUSION: During the last 20 years, the introduction of invasive and more intense antithrombotic treatment has been associated with an increase in bleeding events but concomitant there has been a substantial greater reduction of ischaemic events including improved survival.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Drug Therapy, Combination , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Registries , Treatment Outcome
13.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 18(7): 545-553, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31067981

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rapid contact with emergency medical services is imperative to save the lives of acute myocardial infarction patients. However, many patients turn to a telehealth advisory nurse instead, where the delivery of urgent and safe care largely depends on how the interaction in the call is established. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the interaction between tele-nurses and callers with an evolving myocardial infarction after contacting a national telehealth advisory service number as their first medical contact. METHOD: Twenty men and 10 women (aged 46-89 years) were included. Authentic calls were analysed using inductive content analysis. FINDINGS: One overall category, Movement towards directed level of care, labelled the whole interaction between the tele-nurse and the caller. Four categories conceptualised the different interactions: a distinct, reasoning, indecisive or irrational interaction. The interactions described how tele-nurses and callers assessed and elaborated on symptoms, context and actions. The interaction was pivotal for progress in the dialogue and affected the achievement of mutual understanding in the communicative process. An indecisive or irrational interaction could increase the risk of failing to recommend or call for acute care. CONCLUSION: The interaction in the communication could either lead or mislead the level of care directed in the call. This study adds new perspectives to the communicative process in the acute setting in order to identify a myocardial infarction and the level of urgency from both individuals experiencing myocardial infarction and professionals in the health system.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/standards , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/nursing , Nurse-Patient Relations , Nursing Care/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Telemedicine/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Communication , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sweden
14.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 8(3): 201-207, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29111768

ABSTRACT

AIM: In ST-elevation myocardial infarction, time to reperfusion is crucial for the prognosis. Symptom presentation in myocardial infarction influences pre-hospital delay times but studies about differences in symptoms between patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction are sparse and inconclusive. The aim was to compare symptoms, first medical contact and pre-hospital delay times in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicentre, observational study included 694 myocardial infarction patients from five hospitals. The patients filled in a questionnaire about their pre-hospital experiences within 24 h of hospital admittance. Chest pain was the most common symptom in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (88.7 vs 87.0%, p=0.56). Patients with cold sweat (odds ratio 3.61, 95% confidence interval 2.29-5.70), jaw pain (odds ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.04-5.58), and nausea (odds ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.01-2.87) were more likely to present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, whereas the opposite was true for symptoms that come and go (odds ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.90) or anxiety (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.92). Use of emergency medical services was higher among patients admitted with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The pre-hospital delay time from symptom onset to first medical contact was significantly longer in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (2:05 h vs 1:10 h, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction differed from those with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction regarding symptom presentation, ambulance utilisation and pre-hospital delay times. This knowledge is important to be aware of for all healthcare personnel and the general public especially in order to recognise symptoms suggestive of ST-elevation myocardial infarction and when to decide if there is a need for an ambulance.


Subject(s)
Disease Management , Electrocardiography , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Hospitalization/trends , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Time-to-Treatment , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Risk Factors , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Time Factors
15.
BMJ Open ; 8(5): e020211, 2018 05 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29724738

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Compare gender disparities in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) regarding first medical contact (FMC) and prehospital delay times and explore factors associated with prehospital delay in men and women separately. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study based on medical records and a validated questionnaire. Eligible patients were enrolled within 24 hours after admittance to hospital. SETTING: Patients were included from November 2012 to January 2014 from five Swedish hospitals with catheterisation facilities 24/7. PARTICIPANTS: 340 men and 109 women aged between 31 and 95 years completed the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FMC were divided into five possible contacts: primary healthcare centre by phone or directly, national advisory nurse by phone, emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency room directly. Two parts of prehospital delay times were studied: time from symptom onset to FMC and time from symptom onset to diagnostic ECG. RESULTS: Women more often called an advisory nurse as FMC (28% vs 18%, p=0.02). They had a longer delay until FMC, 90 (IQR 39-221) vs 66 (28-161) min, p=0.04 and until ECG, 146 (68-316) vs 103 (61-221) min, p=0.03. Men went to hospital because of believing they were stricken by an MI to a higher extent than women did (25% vs 15%, p=0.04) and were more often recommended to call EMS by bystanders (38% vs 22%, p<0.01). Hesitating about going to hospital and experiencing pain in the stomach/back/shoulders were factors associated with longer delays in women. Believing the symptoms would disappear or interpreting them as nothing serious were corresponding factors in men. In both genders bystanders acting by contacting EMS explained shorter prehospital delays. CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI, women differed from men in FMC and they had longer delays. This was partly due to atypical symptoms and a longer decision time. Bystanders acted more promptly when men than when women fell ill. Public knowledge of MI symptoms, and how to act properly, still seems insufficient.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Time-to-Treatment , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/psychology , Self Report , Sex Factors , Sweden
16.
Int J Cardiol ; 264: 7-11, 2018 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29642997

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Symptom presentation has been sparsely studied from a gender perspective restricting the inclusion to ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Correct symptom recognition is vital in order to promptly seek care in STEMI where fast reperfusion therapy is of utmost importance. Female gender has been found associated with atypical presentation in studies on mixed MI populations but it is unclear whether this is valid also in STEMI. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether there are gender differences in symptoms and interpretation of these in STEMI, and if this is attributable to sociodemographic and clinical factors. METHODS: SymTime was a multicenter observational study including a validated questionnaire and data from medical records. Eligible STEMI patients (n = 532) were enrolled within 24 h after admittance at five Swedish hospitals. RESULTS: Women were older, more often single and had lower educational level. Chest pain was less prevalent in women (74 vs 93%, p < 0.001), whereas shoulder (33 vs 15%, p < 0.001), throat/neck (34 vs 18%, p < 0.001), back pain (29 versus 12%, p < 0.001) and nausea (49 vs 29%, p < 0.001) were more prevalent. Women less often interpreted their symptoms as of cardiac origin (60 vs 69%, p = 0.04). Female gender was the strongest independent predictor of non-chest pain presentation, odds ratio 5.29, 95% confidence interval 2.85-9.80. CONCLUSIONS: A striking gender difference in STEMI symptoms was found. As women significantly misinterpreted their symptoms more often, it is vital when informing about MI to the society or to high risk individuals, to highlight also other symptoms than just chest pain.


Subject(s)
Pain , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Sex Factors , Symptom Assessment , Aged , Demography , Diagnosis, Differential , Electrocardiography/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/classification , Pain/diagnosis , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden/epidemiology , Symptom Assessment/methods , Symptom Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Time-to-Treatment
17.
Scand J Caring Sci ; 32(1): 346-353, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28543624

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The complex needs of people with chronic heart failure (HF) place great demands on their family members, and it is important to ask family members about their perspectives on the quality of HF care. OBJECTIVE: To describe family members' perceptions of quality of HF care in an outpatient setting. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using a short form of the Quality from Patients' Perspective (QPP) questionnaire for data collection. The items in the questionnaire measure four dimensions of quality, and each item consists of both the perceived reality of the care and its subjective importance. The study included 57 family members of patients with severe HF in NYHA class III-IV. RESULTS: Family members reported areas for quality improvements in three out of four dimensions and in dimensionless items. The lowest level of perceived reality was reported for treatment for confusion and loss of appetite. Treatment for shortness of breath, access to the apparatus and access to equipment necessary for medical care were the items with the highest subjective importance for the family members. CONCLUSION: Family members identified important areas for quality improvement in the care for patients with HF in an outpatient setting. In particular, symptom alleviation, information to patients, patient participation and access to care were identified as areas for improvements. Thus, measuring quality from the family members' perspective with the QPP might be a useful additional perspective when it comes to the planning and implementation of changes in the organisation of HF care.


Subject(s)
Family/psychology , Heart Failure/therapy , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Scand J Caring Sci ; 31(4): 830-838, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27859523

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is a serious condition with high mortality and a high symptom burden. Most patients with heart failure will be taken care of in primary care but the knowledge of how the quality of care is perceived by patients with heart failure is limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to explore how patients with heart failure report quality of care, in an outpatient setting. METHODS: Seventy-one patients with a confirmed diagnosis of heart failure and who were cared for in an outpatient setting were included in this cross-sectional study. Quality of care was assessed with a short form of the Quality from the Patient's Perspective questionnaire. The items measured four dimensions, and each item consists of both perceived reality of the received care and its subjective importance. RESULTS: Inadequate quality was identified in three out of four dimensions and in items without dimension affiliation. In total, inadequate quality was identified in 19 out of 25 items. Patients reported the highest level of perceived reality in 'my family member was treated well' and the lowest perceived reality in 'effective treatment for loss of appetite'. Effective treatment for shortness of breath was of the highest subjective importance for the patients. CONCLUSION: Important areas for improvement in the quality of care for patients with heart failure in an outpatient setting were identified, such as symptom alleviation, information, participation and access to care.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/therapy , Quality Improvement , Quality of Health Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male
19.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 16(1): 108, 2016 05 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27386934

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In myocardial infarction (MI) a short pre-hospital delay, prompt diagnosis and timely reperfusion treatment can improve the prognosis. Despite the importance of timely care seeking, many patients with MI symptoms delay seeking medical care. Previous research is inconclusive about differences in symptom presentation and pre-hospital delay between patients with and without diabetes during MI. The aim of this study was to describe symptoms and patient delay during MI in patients with and without diabetes. METHODS: Swedish cross-sectional multicentre survey study enrolling MI patients in 5 centres within 24 h from admittance. RESULTS: Chest pain was common in patients both with and without diabetes and did not differ after adjustment for age and sex. Patients with diabetes had higher risk for shoulder pain/discomfort, shortness of breath, and tiredness, but lower risk for cold sweat. The three most common symptoms reported by patients with diabetes were chest pain, pain in arms/hands and tiredness. In patients without diabetes the most common symptoms were chest pain, cold sweat and pain in arms/hands. Median patient delay time was 2 h, 24 min for patients with diabetes and 1 h, 15 min for patients without diabetes (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Chest pain was common both in patients with and without diabetes. There were more similarities than differences in MI symptoms between patients with and without diabetes but patients with diabetes had considerably longer delay. This knowledge is important not only for health care personnel meeting patients with suspected MI, but also for the education of people with diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Early Diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Time-to-Treatment/trends , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Rate/trends , Sweden/epidemiology , Time Factors
20.
BMJ Open ; 5(4): e007059, 2015 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25900460

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: It is unknown into what extent patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) utilise a joint service number (Swedish Healthcare Direct, SHD) as first medical contact (FMC) instead of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and how this impact time to diagnosis. We aimed to (1) describe patients' FMC; (2) find explanatory factors influencing their FMC (ie, EMS and SHD) and (3) explore the time interval from symptom onset to diagnosis. SETTING: Multicentred study, Sweden. METHODS: Cross-sectional, enrolling patients with consecutive STEMI admitted within 24 h from admission. RESULTS: We included 109 women and 336 men (mean age 66±11 years). Although 83% arrived by ambulance to the hospital, just half of the patients (51%) called EMS as their FMC. Other utilised SHD (21%), contacted their primary healthcare centre (14%), or went directly to the emergency room (14%). Reasons for not contacting EMS were predominantly; (1) my transport mode was faster (40%), (2) did not consider myself sick enough (30%), and (3) it was easier to be driven or taking a taxi (25%). Predictors associated with contacting SHD as FMC were female gender (OR 1.92), higher education (OR 2.40), history of diabetes (OR 2.10), pain in throat/neck (OR 2.24) and pain intensity (OR 0.85). Predictors associated with contacting EMS as FMC were history of MI (OR 2.18), atrial fibrillation (OR 3.81), abdominal pain (OR 0.35) and believing the symptoms originating from the heart (OR 1.60). Symptom onset to diagnosis time was significantly longer when turning to the SHD instead of the EMS as FMC (1:59 vs 1:21 h, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using other forms of contacts than EMS, significantly prolong delay times, and could adversely affect patient prognosis. Nevertheless, having the opportunity to call the SHD might also, in some instances, lower the threshold for taking contact with the healthcare system, and thus lowers the number that would otherwise have delayed even longer.


Subject(s)
Ambulances/statistics & numerical data , Delayed Diagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hotlines/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Attitude to Health , Chest Pain , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Sweden/epidemiology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...