Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 141(2): 162-167, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31675428

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The detection of memory impairment is an important part of dementia screening. However, the scope of memory measures in current screening batteries is limited. There is a need for a short yet sensitive instrument for early detection of memory impairment that could serve as a complement to existing globally oriented screening tests, for example, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). To that end, the current study investigates the sensitivity and psychometric properties of the memory screening instrument The Five-Items Memory Screen -Extended Variant (FIMS-XV). METHODS: Hundred and forty-five participants included in the Gothenburg Mild Cognitive Impairment Study-27 patients with subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), 73 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 45 with mild dementia-underwent cognitive screening including the MMSE and FIMS-XV. Ninety participants also underwent extensive neuropsychological testing. RESULTS: The FIMS-XV showed high internal consistency and strong correlations with established neuropsychological memory tests. Both the FIMS-XVdelayed recall score and the FIMS-XV total score differentiated mild dementia patients from patients with SCI and MCI. CONCLUSIONS: The FIMS-XV shows promise as a sensitive tool for screening for memory impairment in all putative phases of dementia.


Subject(s)
Dementia/diagnosis , Memory Disorders/diagnosis , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dementia/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Memory Disorders/etiology
2.
Alzheimers Dement ; 12(2): 154-163, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26368321

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar puncture (LP) is increasingly performed in memory clinics. We investigated patient-acceptance of LP, incidence of and risk factors for post-LP complications in memory clinic populations. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 3868 patients (50% women, age 66 ± 11 years, mini mental state examination 25 ± 5) at 23 memory clinics. We used logistic regression analysis using generalized estimated equations to investigate risk factors for post-LP complications, such as typical postlumbar puncture headache (PLPH) and back pain. RESULTS: A total of 1065 patients (31%) reported post-LP complaints; 589 patients (17%) reported back pain, 649 (19%) headache, of which 296 (9%) reported typical PLPH. Only few patients needed medical intervention: 11 (0.3%) received a blood patch, 23 (0.7%) were hospitalized. The most important risk factor for PLPH was medical history of headache. An atraumatic needle and age >65 years were preventive. Gender, rest after LP, or volume of cerebrospinal fluid had no effect. DISCUSSIONS: The overall risk of complications is relatively low. If risk factors shown in this study are taken into account, LPs can be safely performed in memory clinics.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , Memory/physiology , Spinal Puncture/adverse effects , Aged , Cognition Disorders/cerebrospinal fluid , Dementia/cerebrospinal fluid , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Post-Dural Puncture Headache/epidemiology , Post-Dural Puncture Headache/etiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Puncture/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...