Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Transplant ; 28(1): e14688, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38317344

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, and effective prevention of GvHD is critical for the success of the HSCT procedure. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been used for decades as the backbone of GvHD prophylaxis. In this study, the efficacy and safety of Cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (TCR) were compared in pediatric HSCT for thalassemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 129 pediatric patients who underwent HSCT with the diagnosis of thalassemia at Medicalpark Göztepe and Antalya Hospitals between January 2017 and December 2020. RESULTS: Despite the GvHD prophylaxis, grade II-IV acute GvHD developed in 29 patients. Of these patients, 12 had only gut, 10 had only skin, 6 had combined gut and skin, and one had only liver GvHD. Fifteen of these 29 patients were in the CsA group, and 14 of them were in the TCR group. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of acute GvHD occurrence, GvHD stage, or involvement sites. In terms of CNI-related toxicity, neurotoxicity in 15 (CsA n = 9, TCR n = 6) and nephrotoxicity in 18 (CsA n = 4, TCR n = 14) patients were observed. While there was no difference between the two groups in terms of neurotoxicity, more nephrotoxicity developed in patients using TCR (p = .013). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of engraftment syndrome, veno-occlusive disease, CMV reactivation, PRES, or graft rejection. CONCLUSION: Regarding GvHD, there was no difference in efficacy between TCR and CsA usage. Patients taking TCR experienced noticeably higher nephrotoxicity in terms of adverse effects. This difference should be considered according to the patient's clinical situation while choosing a CNI.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Thalassemia , Humans , Child , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Calcineurin Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell
3.
Acta Haematol ; 145(4): 362-370, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34847551

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (haplo-HSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) in children has emerged as an acceptable alternative to the patients without a matched donor. However, the timing of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) used in combination with PTCY is increasingly becoming a topic of controversy. METHOD: We evaluated 49 children with acute leukemia who underwent unmanipulated haplo-HSCT with PTCY according to the initiation day of CNIs (pre- or post-cyclophosphamide [CY]). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the overall survival analysis between the 2 groups. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 21.2% in the pre-CY group and 38.9% in the post-CY group (p = 0.33). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed more frequently in the post-CY group (p = 0.04). The overall survival and event-free survival at 2 years in patients with and without CRS in the pre-CY group were 42.9% versus 87.5% (p = 0.04) and 38.1% versus 87.5% (p = 0.04), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the argument for starting CNI administration after CY is tenuous, and the rationale for not starting CNIs before CY needs to be reconsidered.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Calcineurin Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Child , Cyclophosphamide , Cytokine Release Syndrome , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/complications , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation, Haploidentical/adverse effects
4.
Pediatr Transplant ; 24(8): e13882, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33073505

ABSTRACT

Although advancements have been made in monitoring and preventing viral infections in HSCT patients, CMV reactivation still remains a critical post-transplant complication. Adoptive cell therapy is an alternative to pharmacotherapy of CMV infection in refractory patients. We retrospectively reviewed CMV infection cases after allogeneic HSCT who received U-DLI as treatment. In total, five pediatric patients between the ages of 0.5-16 years that received U-DLI for a post-HSCT CMV infection were evaluated. The dose of CD3+ lymphocytes administered in DLI was 5 × 104 /kg, except in one patient transplanted from his sibling. One patient, who was transplanted from an unrelated donor, received U-DLI from his haploidentical mother. CMV titers dramatically reduced after U-DLI. If the availability of CMV-specific CTL is an issue, we propose that one should consider using the U-DLI therapy with low cell dose from a seropositive donor. In case the stem cell donor is seronegative and a seropositive donor is unavailable, using the U-DLI therapy from seropositive, haploidentical donors is a promising way of treatment. More studies need to be conducted to further confirm the safety and efficacy of this treatment procedure.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections/immunology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Lymphocytes , Male , Retrospective Studies , Unrelated Donors
5.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 67(4): e28190, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31981413

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing performance of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation over the last decades, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains the main cause of morbidity and mortality. The efficacy of ruxolitinib against GVHD has been demonstrated in adult studies; however, very few studies have been conducted in children. PROCEDURE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ruxolitinib in 29 children with steroid-refractory acute or chronic GVHD. Twenty-five (87%) patients received at least three different immune modulator agents, including methylprednisolone, before initiating ruxolitinib. RESULTS: All grade 2 acute GVHD patients completely responded to ruxolitinib treatment; 82% of high-grade (3-4) acute GVHD patients and 80% of chronic GVHD (moderate-severe) patients had at least a partial response. Of seven patients with bronchiolitis obliterans, five had a partial response after ruxolitinib. Of 29 patients, 22 were administered steroids at any time in the first month of acute GVHD or the first three months of chronic GVHD during ruxolitinib usage, which was significantly tapered by the end of the observation period. CONCLUSION: Steroid-refractory acute and chronic pediatric GVHD patients treated with ruxolitinib had a high overall response rate, with the additional benefit of steroid sparing.


Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis Obliterans/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Salvage Therapy , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Allografts , Bronchiolitis Obliterans/etiology , Bronchiolitis Obliterans/mortality , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Humans , Infant , Male , Nitriles , Pyrimidines , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...