ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The importance of COVID-19 vaccination for patients on immunosuppressive (IS) medication has increased due to the high risk of severe disease or mortality. Different vaccines have varying efficacy rates against symptomatic COVID-19, ranging from 46.8% to 95%. The objective of this study was to examine the differences in anti-Spike IgG, anti-Spike IgA, and neutralizing antibody (NAb) activity between the inactive CoronaVac vaccine and the mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine in IS patients. METHOD: A total of 441 volunteers, including 104 IS patients, 263 healthy controls (HC), who received two doses of CoronaVac or BNT162b2, and 74 unvaccinated patients with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, were included in the study. Anti-spike IgG, IgA, and NAb activity were investigated. RESULTS: Immunogenicity with BNT162b2 was higher than with CoronaVac, but in IS groups, it was lower than HC (CoronaVac-IS: 79.3%, CoronaVac-HC: 96.5%, p < 0.001; BNT162b2-IS: 91.3%, BNT162b2-HC: 100%, p = 0.005). With CoronaVac, anti-Spike IgG levels were significantly lower than BNT162b2 (CoronaVac-IS: 234.5AU/mL, CoronaVac-HC: 457.85AU/mL; BNT162b2-IS: 5311.2AU/mL, BNT162b2-HC: 8842.8AU/mL). NAb activity in the BNT162b2 group was significantly higher. NAb and anti-Spike IgG levels were found to be correlated. Among the IS group, a significantly lower response to the vaccines was observed when using rituximab. IgA levels were found to be lower with CoronaVac. CONCLUSIONS: Although immunogenicity was lower in IS patients, an acceptable response was obtained with both vaccines, and significantly higher anti-Spike IgG, anti-Spike IgA, and NAb activity levels were obtained with BNT162b2.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The present objective was to evaluate effects of acetaminophen and mannitol on renal function and histopathology in crush injuries. METHODS: Thirty-six rats weighing 370-400 g each were used. No surgery was performed on the first (control) group. The gastrocnemius muscle regions of each rat in the remaining 5 groups were compressed for 2 or 24 hours. In the 4th group, 100 mg/kg acetaminophen was intraperitoneally administered. In the 5th group, 1 g/kg mannitol was administered. In the 6th group, 100 mg/kg acetaminophen and 1 g/kg mannitol were administered. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed among the treatment groups in terms of sodium, potassium, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and average creatinine clearance values. Hydropic degeneration, tubular necrosis, presence of immunoperoxidase and myoglobin, tubulus epithelial cell degeneration, and presence of PAS-dyed material in tubular lumen was more prominently decreased in the acetaminophen group than the mannitol group. Improvement was observed in the group that was administered both drugs, compared to the mannitol-only group, though findings were still worse than those of the group administered acetaminophen only. CONCLUSION: In crush injuries, acetaminophen improves histopathological renal damage better than mannitol. When used in conjunction with mannitol, the toxic effect of acetaminophen on the liver is decreased.
