Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr Urol ; 15(1): 67.e1-67.e6, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30392887

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Nomograms and scoring systems designed for predicting the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in adults are currently available. However, no scoring system currently exists primarily for predicting PCNL success in children. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to develop a scoring system to predict the stone-free and complication rates by using pre-operative parameters. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 434 renal units belonging to patients with kidney stones who underwent PCNL between 1997 and 2017. Renal stone index was calculated by dividing the length of the stone along its longest axis by the length of the kidney along its longest axis. Guy's Stone scores, S.T.O.N.E scores, and CROES scores for adults were calculated by filling in the variables for each patient. Factors that predicted success and complications were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Mean age was 8.3 (1-16) years, and male to female ratio was 236:165. When stone-free patients were compared with other patients, there was a statistically significant difference in the average stone/kidney index (SKI) value (stone size/kidney size on longitudinal axis) (0.266 vs 0.339, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, factors that predicted success were the SKI and number of stones. A newly developed scoring scale, the stone-kidney score (SKS), combined scores for both the SKI and the number of stones into one value. A minimum total SKS score was 2, and a maximum total SKS score was 4. Success rates for SKS scores of 2, 3, and 4 were 86.4%, 73%, and 62.9% (P < 0.001), respectively. Complication rates for SKS scores of 2, 3, and 4 were 13%, 22.1%, and 23.8%, respectively. DISCUSSION: The new scoring system has only two variables (number of stones and SKI) and three risk groups. An SKS score is easier to use and calculate. An SKI value can be simply calculated on any imaging modality by dividing the length of the stone along its longest axis by the length of the kidney along its longest axis. As in the new scoring system, the SKI value combined with the number of stones is useful in predicting stone-free rates after PCNL. CONCLUSION: When evaluated together, the SKI and presence of multiple stones may predict stone-free rates pre-operatively. The SKS is an individual-specific method that can be easily used in pediatric clinical practice. Further studies are required to develop and standardize this method.


Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi/pathology , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Organ Size , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Pediatr Urol ; 15(1): 73.e1-73.e6, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30472078

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is an anatomic or functional disorder, and it is a condition associated with renal scarring, hypertension, and end-stage renal disease. Renal damage can be prevented by appropriate medical and surgical intervention for selected patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the surgically treated patient group of this study in reference to the risk analysis criteria used in European Association of Urology (EAU), European Society for Paediatric Urology (ESPU) guidelines to see the outcome of the study management protocol within the last 15 years in respect to this risk analysis. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 686 patients who were operated upon in a single institution for VUR between 1997 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the criteria in EAU/ESPU guidelines, the patients were classified into three groups: low, medium, and high risk. Risk factors were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The patient numbers for low, medium, and high risk were 92 (13.4%), 485 (70.7%), and 109 (15.9%), respectively. In the high-risk group, surgeons tended to do more ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) (82.6%), whereas in the low-risk group, surgeons tended to do more subureteric injection (STING) (76.1%). The success rates for STING and UNC were found to be 75% and 93%, respectively. Although there was a difference in success rates among patients treated with STING or UNC, this difference was not statistically significant in success rates regarding risk groups for patients treated with STING or UNC. DISCUSSION: The most recent guideline was that which was published by the EAU/ESPU organization in 2012. This guideline is established based on the risk analysis. The analysis revealed that patients in the low-risk group tended to undergo endoscopic surgery treatment method, whereas patients in the high-risk group tended to undergo open surgery. Therefore, the study management over the last 10 years has been mainly in line with the current recommendations. CONCLUSION: The analysis shows that when the patients are classified according to the EAU/ESPU risk classification, surgeons tended to perform more endoscopic and more open surgery for the low- and high-risk groups, respectively. Although each surgical modality had similar success rates in each group, open surgical results were overall much higher than those of endoscopic surgery in each group. This was a specifically important finding in high-risk group where the endoscopically treated group of patients was small in number, and the need for a definitive correction is essential in this group because of increased risk of renal injury.


Subject(s)
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/surgery , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Europe , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Pediatrics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Societies, Medical , Treatment Outcome , Urologic Surgical Procedures/standards , Urology
3.
J Urol ; 195(4 Pt 1): 1082-7, 2016 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26682755

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We analyzed factors that might affect outcome in terms of success and incidence of complications in children up to 17 years after undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 346 renal units (294 patients) were analyzed in terms of postoperative outcome. Factors investigated that might affect outcome were patient gender, age, stone laterality, largest stone size, stone burden, number of stones, location of a single stone, previous intervention and instrument size. RESULTS: Mean ± SD patient age was 8.51 ± 4.91 years, and male-to-female ratio was 209:137. Mean ± SD stone burden was 3.49 ± 3.3 cm(2). Stone-free rates after a single procedure were 84.4% and 73.1% in patients with and without clinically insignificant residual stones, respectively. On univariate and multivariate analyses stone burden and number of stones affected the stone-free rate. Complications consisted of bleeding in 41 patients (11.8%), postoperative urinary tract infection in 21 (6%), urosepsis in 4 (0.1%) and hydrothorax in 4 (0.1%). One patient died of multiple organ failure. Through the years blood transfusion and complication rates decreased, and the use of smaller instruments increased significantly. Although bleeding occurred less often in cases where a 14Fr sheath was used rather than a larger sheath (5% vs 12%, p = 0.142), the difference was not significant. No significant factor affecting complication rates was detected. CONCLUSIONS: As in adults, percutaneous nephrolithotomy can be used in children with acceptable complication rates and good success rates for surgical treatment of complex renal stones. Number of stones and stone burden are predictive of postoperative stone-free rate.


Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi/surgery , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/methods , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Kidney/surgery , Male , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...