Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Tuberk Toraks ; 71(4): 356-366, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38152006

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The aim of this study was to elucidate the incidence of local, large local and systemic reactions after subcutaneus immunotherapy (SCIT) injections in our clinic and to determine the characteristic features of these adverse reactions. Materials and Methods: A total of 6000 SCIT injections administered to 163 patients between January 2011 and December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The study population consisted of patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis who underwent SCIT due to pollen, house dust mite or cat allergy, or patients who underwent SCIT due to venom allergy. Demographic characteristics of the patients, diagnoses, allergen sensitivities, immunotherapy protocol applied, adverse reactions, and the characteristics of these reactions were recorded. Result: Totally, 163 patients with a mean age of 36.8 ± 12.7 years were enrolled in this research. Sex distribution was as follows: 55.2% (n= 90) were females. During the study, 218 allergic reactions were detected in 83 patients. The incidence of adverse reactions per injection was 3.6%. The probability of developing an adverse reaction in a patient during the entire subcutaneous immunotherapy was 53.9%. Of the adverse reactions that developed, 94 (43.1%, n= 47) were observed locally while 56 (25.7%, n= 40) were large local reactions, and 68 (31.2%, n= 30) were systemic. Incidence of adverse reactions per injection were 1.5%, 0.9%, and 1.1% for local reaction, large local reaction, and systemic reaction, respectively. Conclusions: The results of this analysis elaborated that subcutaneous immunotherapy is a safe and tolerable treatment modality. However, before initiating treatment, the benefits and risks should be evaluated. The risk of systemic reactions is quite low, but fatal anaphylaxis can occur, so physicians need to be aware of the potential risks.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Desensitization, Immunologic , Female , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Male , Allergens/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Injections, Subcutaneous , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Pollen , Immunotherapy
2.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 28(6): 1454-1457, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35060790

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Osimertinib is an approved therapy for patients with a Thr790met (T790M) mutation diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that progresses during epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy. However, in 7-13% of patients, drug-related side effects lead to discontinuation of osimertinib treatment. In such cases, osimertinib desensitization is a treatment option that can be considered. CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old female patient, who was followed up with the diagnosis of stage 4 NSCLC, was consulted to the allergy clinic because of urticaria. The patient developed urticaria plaques 20 h after the third dose of osimertinib tablet. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: With the diagnosis of osimertinib-induced urticaria, desensitization was planned for the patient. Treatment was started with a dose of 0.1 mg/day osimertinib. The procedure was completed in approximately 50 days, and a dose of 80 mg/day was reached with antihistamine suppression. DISCUSSION: Here, a successful osimertinib desensitization in a patient with a history of osimertinib-related type 1 allergic reaction is reported. Osimertinib desensitization is a treatment option that should be considered in cases where treatment has to be ceased due to drug-related side effects.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Urticaria , Acrylamides , Aniline Compounds/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Female , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Indoles , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Middle Aged , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pyrimidines , Urticaria/chemically induced
3.
Tuberk Toraks ; 69(3): 399-402, 2021 Sep.
Article in Turkish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34581162

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic hypersensitivity reactions can lead to marked morbidity, mortality and inadequate treatment options. Mycobacterium abscessus infection is a difficult management system for clinicians since it most commonly involves the lungs, progresses if untreated, and the organism is resistant to many antibiotics, as well as the agents used in treatment can cause undesirable side effects. Although macrolides are one of the most reliable antibiotic groups in terms of allergic reactions, early type hypersensitivity reactions against macrolides, one of the main antibiotics used in the treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease, may make the treatment management of the disease difficult. Due to the rapid increase in the use of quinolone in recent years, the frequency of developing allergic reactions with these agents also increases. In cases where antibiotic hypersensitivity is detected, the use of the responsible agent should be avoided, but desensitization may be necessary in cases without different treatment options. In this study, it was aimed to present a case of successful desensitization with clarithromycin and moxifloxacin in a patient who was diagnosed with Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease and developed anaphylaxis with clarithromycin and moxifloxacin after treatment was initiated.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous , Mycobacterium abscessus , Quinolones , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Macrolides , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/chemically induced , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/diagnosis , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/drug therapy , Quinolones/adverse effects
4.
Tuberk Toraks ; 69(3): 433-436, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34581170

ABSTRACT

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, case reports have been published where patients with severe asthma using biological agents survived with a mild course of illness and encouraged the continuation of biological therapies in patients with severe asthma. However, contrary to previous information, a more severe course of COVID-19 has recently been reported in severe asthmatics using biological therapy compared to the general population. To evaluate the COVID-19 rate and disease severity in severe asthmatics using biological agents. A retrospective study was conducted in patients with severe asthma treated with biological agents. Data concerning whether the subjects had contracted COVID-19 and the severity of the disease were evaluated. Eihgty-four severe asthmatics using biological agents (omalizumab or mepolizumab) aged 48.3 ± 10.6 years (mean ± standard deviation) with female/male ratio: 53 (63.1%)/31 (36.9%) were included in the study. Among participants 13 (15.5%) had contracted COVID-19. The course of COVID-19 was mild in five (38.5%) and moderate in eight patients (61.5%), while none of the patients had a severe course of COVID-19. Mechanical ventilation or intensive care follow-up was not required in any of the six patients (46.2%) who were treated as inpatients. All participants survived COVID-19 in full recovery and no deaths occurred in the cases. A higher rate of COVID-19 was found in patients with severe asthma using biologics compared to those reported in previous reports. However, all patients with COVID-19 have a mild to moderate disease course.


Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents , Asthma , COVID-19 , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/epidemiology , Biological Factors/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
5.
World Allergy Organ J ; 14(7): 100558, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34122718

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) must be continued for 3 years, to achieve a long-term modifying effect. Adherence is a key to ensure effectiveness. The objective of this study was, first of all, to evaluate the adherence with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and to identify the main causes of SCIT withdrawal in real-life practice in our clinic. Secondly, we also aimed to investigate to what extent the COVID-19 pandemic altered our SCIT receiving patients' treatment adherence behaviors and the factors that affected their decisions. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients ages ≥18 years, who had started SCIT in January 2014 or later until September 2020 in our department for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma or venom allergy, were included in the study. Adherence was determined as the accomplishment of 3 years of SCIT. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients (72 female [58.1%]; median age, 35 [19-77] years) were included. The adherence rate to SCIT in our tertiary center's real-life setting was 56.25% with a follow-up duration of 3 years before COVID-19 pandemic. Dose modification, defined as reducing patient's planned SCIT dose due to a systemic allergic/large local reaction or missed injection, and its frequency, which is the number of dose adjustments done throughout the SCIT, was found to be the only factor related to nonadherence. But with the pandemic only in 6 months, among 63 patients receiving SCIT, 15 patients (23.81%) dropped out, and the most common reason was fear of being infected with COVID-19 virus during receiving SCIT in hospital (93.33%). The only independent predictor of drop-out during the COVID-19 pandemic was short duration of AIT (p = 0.012). When we compare the dropped-out cases before and after the start of pandemic, AIT duration was significantly shorter in pandemic period (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Adherence rate to SCIT in our real-world setting study was 56.25% before the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results indicated that patients requiring dose modification were more prone to be non-adherent. Approximately one quarter of patients dropped-out with the start of pandemic, almost all due to fear of being infected during receiving SCIT in hospital. Since short SCIT follow-up time was found to be the only risk factor for drop-out during the COVID-19 pandemic, we believe that patients who are in the early phases of their treatment should be observed more closely and their concerns should be answered by their doctors.

6.
Gene ; 673: 201-205, 2018 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29928945

ABSTRACT

TMPRSS6 gene mutations can result in iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and cause an increased iron-regulatory hormone, hepcidin, levels. TMPRSS6 encodes a serine protease, matriptase-2, which functions as negative regulatory protein of hepcidin transcription. Thus, TMPRSS6 variations might be risk factors for IDA. The aim of the study was to investigate the association of rs855791, rs4820268, rs5756506, rs2235324, rs2413450, rs2111833, rs228919, and rs733655 SNPs in TMPRSS6 gene with IDA susceptibility and iron-related clinical parameters. The study consisted of 150 IDA patients and 100 healthy controls. We analyzed the genotype distributions by using Real-Time polymerase chain reaction (Real-Time PCR) technique. We did not find any statistically differences for all SNPs between patients and controls (P > 0.05). In IDA patients, variations rs855791 and rs2413450 were associated with increased RBC (P = 0.03) and TIBC (P = 0.04), respectively. Also, increased of TIBC for rs4820268 (P < 0.05). On the other hand, in control group, rs5756506 was associated with two parameters, Hb (P = 0.02) and Hct (P = 0.03). We did not find markedly hepcidin levels in IDA patients compared to controls (P = 0.32). Our findings suggest that TMPRSS6 variations may not be risk factors for IDA. However, TMPRSS6 polymorphisms are associated with increased many iron-related hematological parameters.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/genetics , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Serine Endopeptidases/genetics , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Genotype , Hematocrit , Hemoglobins/chemistry , Hepcidins/chemistry , Humans , Iron/blood , Male , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Serine Endopeptidases/metabolism , Turkey
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...