An Overview on Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a progressive liver disease characterized by chronic inflammation leading to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Even though the exact pathogenesis is still unclear, a combination of autoimmune, environmental, and ischemic factors could explain certain aspects of the disease. The most important diagnostic step is cholangiography, which can be obtained either by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRCP as the gold standard), or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. It shows multifocal short biliary duct strictures leading to the "beaded" aspect. Cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal adenocarcinoma are the most feared complications in patients with Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Continuous screening consists of annual clinical, biochemical, and ultrasound assessments in asymptomatic patients and annual colonoscopy in patients with PSC and inflammatory bowel disease. In newly diagnosed patients with PSC, colonoscopy is mandatory and, if negative, then, a repeat colonoscopy should be performed in 3-5 years. The lack of efficient curative medical treatment makes invasive treatments such as liver transplant and endoscopy the mainstream for managing PSC and its complications. Until now, even though only ursodeoxycholic acid has shown a moderate clinical, biochemical, and even histological improvement, it has no significant influence on the risk of cholangiocarcinoma, liver transplant need, or death risk and it is no longer recommended in treating early PSC. Further studies are in progress to establish the effect of molecular-targeted therapies in PSC.

EUS-Guided Transgastric Drainage of Intraabdominal Fluid Collections.

Intraabdominal fluid collections can be a significant cause of morbi-mortality among patients with acute pancreatitis and those who underwent surgery, especially oncological ones. Nowadays, the treatment tends to be minimally invasive, so that the patient's recovery would be shorter and the quality of life higher. EUS (endoscopic ultrasound) has emerged in the last decade to fulfill that demand, alongside percutaneous and surgical drainage in the management of perigastric collections. Objectives: The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy of EUS guided drainage in terms of techincal and clinical success. Secondary objectives refer to the assessment of complete resolution of intraabdominal collection, presence of infection after drainage, overall survival. Methods: We conducted a prospective study by enrolling 31 patients who were diagnosed using EUS with perigastric intraabdominal fluid collections, from an overall of 788 EUS performed over a period of 2 years. We analyzed their evolution during 6 months after treatment, by regular examinations (ultrasound/endoscopic/computed tomography). All of them were in-patients of Bucharest Clinical Emergency Hospital, either in Endoscopy or in Surgery Departments. Data collected was processed in IBM SPSS Statistics 20. Results: Overall mean age was 51 year and intraabdominal collections average was 109 mm (range 34 250 mm) and was correlated with the method of treatment (p 0.005). Patients underwent different methods for their intraabdominal collections: EUS drainage, CT (computed-tomography)- guided percutaneous drainage, surgical intervention, alone or combined when needed. Overall mortality was 9,3% and was mainly related to the severity of the case and sepsis. Conclusions: We conclude that endoscopic ultrasound can be the first choice for drainage of intraabdominal perigastric fluid collections because it is a safe and effective technique with 100 % technical success, and with over 80 % clinical success assures a better quality of life. For collections with a diameter larger than 127 mm, we can expect however the need of combined treatment, EUS and surgery.

Retained Common Bile Duct Lithiasis at a Pacient with Periampullary Duodenal Diverticulum.

Periampullary duodenal diverticula are associated with the presence of common bile duct stones, being encountered more frequently with the increase of age. We present the case of a 76 years old female patient, who underwents emergency surgery for a perforated lithiasic gangrenous acute cholecystitis and for whom we perform a cholecystectomy and an external biliary drainage using a transcystic tube. Both preoperative and postoperative imaging and endoscopic examinations certify the presence of a periampullary duodenal diverticulum. Postoperative cholangiography performed on the transcystic tube raises the suspicion of retained common bile duct lithiasis. An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is performed, initially failing to cannulate the common bile duct. A precut sphincterotomy fistula technnique is performed, using as reference a guide inserted on the transcystic tube, with the extraction of biliay sludge from the common bile duct, and with subsequently favorable development. Association between common bile duct lithiasis and a periampullary duodenal diverticulum may represent a therapeutic challenge because of the increased risk of failure of the endoscopic treatment.