The intervertebral disc during growth: Signal intensity changes on magnetic resonance imaging and their relevance to low back pain.

Life-time prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in children and adolescents varies from 7% to 72%. Disc changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been reported in up to 44% of children with earliest observations around pre-puberty. In this longitudinal cohort study, our objective was to determine the natural history of disc changes from childhood to early adulthood, and the possible association of these changes to LBP. Healthy 8-year-old schoolchildren were recruited for this longitudinal study consisting of a semi-structured interview, a clinical examination, and an MRI investigation at the age of 8-9 (Y8), 11-12 (Y12) and 18-19 (Y19) years. The interview inquired about LBP without trauma. T2-weighted sagittal MRI of the lumbar spine was acquired. Life-long prevalence of LBP was determined, and the disc signal intensity (SI) at the three lowest lumbar levels was assessed both visually using the Schneiderman classification (Bright-Speckled-Dark), and digitally using the disc to cerebrospinal fluid -SI ratio. Possible associations between SI changes and LBP were analyzed. Ninety-four of 208 eligible children were included at Y8 in 1994, 13 and 23 participants were lost to follow-up at Y12 and Y19, respectively. Prevalence of LBP increased after the pubertal growth spurt reaching 54% at Y19. On MRI, 18%, 10% and 38% of participants had disc SI changes at Y8, Y12 and Y19, respectively. No significant associations between self-reported LBP and either qualitative or quantitative disc SI changes were observed at any age. Life-time prevalence of LBP reached 54% by early adulthood. Disc SI changes on MRI traditionally labeled as degenerative were seen earlier than previously reported. Changes in disc SI were not associated with the presence of LBP in childhood, adolescence or early adulthood.

ISSLS prize in clinical science 2022: accelerated disc degeneration after pubertal growth spurt differentiates adults with low back pain from their asymptomatic peers.

PURPOSE: In this prospective observational cohort study, the development of lumbar intervertebral discs (LIVD) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was investigated from childhood to adulthood with emphasis on the possible association of disc degeneration (DD) to low back pain (LBP). METHODS: In 2021, 89 subjects who were enrolled in 1994 in a longitudinal study with lumbar spine MRI at ages 8, 11 and 18 were invited to participate in a long-term follow-up comprising a clinical examination, selected patient-reported outcome measures and a lumbar spine MRI. We assessed all MRIs (three lowest LIVDs) with the Pfirrmann summary score, and the ratio of signal intensity of nucleus pulposus to signal intensity of cerebrospinal fluid (SINDL). We further analyzed whether disc changes at any age were associated with self-reported LBP at age 34. RESULTS: Of the 48 subjects in the follow-up, 35 reported LBP at age 34. The Pfirrmann summary score significantly increased with age (p < 0.001). Subjects reporting LBP at age 34 demonstrated statistically significantly higher summary scores at age 18 and 34 compared to asymptomatic subjects (p = 0.004 at age 18, and p = 0.039 at age 34). SINDL significantly decreased with age (p < 0.001 for all levels separately), but no significant differences between subjects with or without LBP at age 34 were noticed. CONCLUSION: Subjects with LBP at age 34 had more widespread or severe DD already at age 18 compared to those without LBP.

Long-term outcome after posterolateral, anterior, and circumferential fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: magnetic resonance imaging findings after average of 17-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study to evaluate the long-term result of posterolateral (PLF), anterior (AF), and circumferential fusion (CF) for isthmic spondylolisthesis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term effects of PLF, AF, or CF for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis on lumbar spine in children and adolescents by using MRI. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Short- and mid-term clinical and plain radiographic results of isthmic spondylolisthesis and of PLF, AF, and CF in severe slip are well documented. The long-term effect of the fusion on soft tissues, on the intervertebral discs inside and above fusion in particular, is, however, unclear. METHODS: Between 1977 and 1991, PLF (n = 21), AF (n = 22), or CF (n = 24) was performed on 67 patients (42 females, 25 males) with high-grade (slip > or =50%) isthmic spondylolisthesis. The average age of patients at the time of operation was 14.4 (range, 8.9-19.6) years. Clinical, spinal mobility and trunk strength in addition to MRI and plain radiograph examinations were performed on these patients after an average follow-up time of 17.3 years (range, 10.7-26.0 years). RESULTS: Three (14%) patients in the PLF and AF groups, but none in the CF group, reported back pain often or very often at rest. The mean Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was 9.7 (range, 0-62) in the PLF, 8.1 (0-32) in the AF, and 2.3 (0-14) in the CF group (P < 0.05). The mean slip before surgery was 66% (range, 50%-100%) and at the last follow-up visit 66% (range, 26%-106%). Disc degeneration was most common in the PLF group (P = 0.0014) and inside the fusion and in the lowest moving intervertebral disc spaces in all subgroups. Only 1 patient had an asymptomatic prolapse. In MR images, none of the patients had lumbar central canal stenosis inside or above the fusion. In contrast, the spinal canal was wide at the spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis level in 23 (34%) patients. Of the patients, 19 (28%) patients (32 neural foramens) had severe narrowing of the neural foramen with impingement of the nerve root. No patients had clinically confirmed L5 nerve root symptoms. Muscle degeneration was found in 29 (43%) of patients. Longer fusion and muscle degeneration, but not disc degeneration, were associated with lower performance in spinal mobility and trunk-strength measurement tests. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcome was best in the CF group as measured by ODI. Degenerative changes were most commonly found at the level of the slip and above the fusion level. The prevalence of disc prolapses was low. Spinal fusion for isthmic spondylolysis is not associated with central canal stenosis above the fusion. Radiologic nerve root stenosis was common but asymptomatic. Mild muscle atrophy was common.

Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis in adolescence with reduction or fusion in situ: long-term clinical, radiologic, and functional outcome.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective follow-up study with two cohorts: one treated with reduction and the other with fusion in situ. OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term effects of reduction versus fusion in situ on lumbar spine in children and adolescents with severe L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Severe isthmic spondylolisthesis is commonly treated with fusion in situ, but modern surgical techniques and instrumentation permit the reduction of a severely slipped fifth lumbar vertebra. Advocates of one or another of these procedures present different claims to defend their choice. However, to our knowledge, no long-term results of the reduction maneuver exist. METHODS: Between 1983 and 1991, 22 adolescents with severe (more than 60%) slip were treated surgically. In 11 of them, reduction was performed with a Magerl/Dick transpedicular device, followed by fusion posteriorly from L4 or L5 to S1 and anteriorly from L5 to S1. In the others, fusion was performed in situ posteriorly from L4 (n = 7) or L5 (n = 4) to S1 and anteriorly from L5 to S1. The average age of patients at surgery was 14.7 years (range 10.7-18.5). Radiographs obtained before surgery, after surgery, and at the final follow-up evaluation were assessed for quality of fusion. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging was obtained at the last follow-up visit. Average follow-up time was 14.8 years (range 11.6-18.7). Physical examination, spinal mobility, and nondynamometric trunk strength measurements were used to assess, and Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society scores were used to calculate outcome at the last follow-up visit. RESULTS: In the reduction group, mean Oswestry Disability Index was 7.2 (range 0-20) and in the fusion in situ group, was 1.6 (range 0-4) (P = 0.0096). The Scoliosis Research Society total score averaged 90.0 (range 39-107) in the reduction group and 103.9 (range 93-120) in the fusion in situ group (P = 0.046). At the last follow-up evaluation, mean vertebral slip had decreased from the preoperative value of 90% to 57% in the reduction group but remained the same (80% vs. 78%) in the fusion in situ group (P = 0.04 and 0.013, respectively, for preoperative and postoperative comparison). On magnetic resonance imaging, disc degeneration above the fusion was more common in the reduction group (P = 0.004). None of the patients had spinal stenosis above the fusion. Nerve root canal impingement at the L5-S1 level was more common in the fusion in situ group (P = 0.03), but all patients were free of L5 nerve root symptoms. There was no difference in spinal mobility or trunk strength measurements between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The fusion in situ group seems to perform better in almost all clinical parameters measured. These findings suggest that fusion in situ should be considered as a method of choice in severe L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Direct repair for treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: no benefit in comparison to segmental fusion after a mean follow-up of 14.8 years.

The aim of the present study was to assess the long-term clinical, functional, and radiographic outcome of direct repair of spondylolysis using cerclage wire fixation according to Scott in young patients with symptomatic spondylolysis or low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis as compared to the outcome after uninstrumented posterolateral in situ fusion. Twenty-five out of 28 patients of the direct repair group (89%) and 23 out of 28 of the fusion group (82%) were available for follow-up examination. The assessment by independent observers included a structured interview (Oswestry questionnaire [ODI], visual analogue scale, SRS questionnaire), a clinical examination, functional testing, plain radiography, and MRI. The groups were comparable as to the mean age at operation (18.2 vs. 16.2 years.), the follow-up time (14.8 vs. 15.0 years), and the amount of preoperative slip (7.2 vs. 13.1%). The mean ODI and SRS total scores were significantly better in the fusion group (4.3 [0-16] and 96 [57-117]) as compared to the direct repair group (11.4[0-52] and 87[53-107]; P=0.02 and P=0.011, respectively). In functional testing, both groups reached normal values for abdominal and back muscle strength. The lumbar spine flexion and extension ROM was decreased in both groups showing no statistical difference between the groups. Significant progressive narrowing of the olisthetic disc was detected on the plain radiographs after direct repair. On the flexion-extension radiographs, in the direct repair group, the mobility in the lytic/olisthetic segment was decreased in comparison to normal values from the literature. The mobility at the level above the operated segment was decreased in the direct repair group as compared to the fusion group (P=0.057). On T2-weighted MR images in the direct repair group, the signal intensity of the disc below the affected vertebra was decreased in 17/23 (74%) patients. There was no difference between the groups in the nucleus signal intensity of the adjacent disc above the operated segment. No association between the disc degeneration on MRI and the outcome of the patients could be established. In the direct repair group the following complications were seen: transient nerve root irritation (2), superficial infection (1), UTI (1); in the fusion group the complications were: subcutaneous seroma (2) and UTI (1). There were six re-operations, cerclage removal(4), conversion into segmental fusion(2) in the direct repair group, and one re-operation, instrumented respondylodesis, in the fusion group. In conclusion, the results of direct repair of the spondylolysis using cerclage wire fixation according to Scott were very satisfactory in 76% of the patients after a mean follow-up of 14.8 years. After direct repair, the ODI deteriorated with time leading to a clinically moderate but statistically significant difference in favour of segmental fusion. Lumbar spine mobility was decreased after direct repair. Secondary segmental instability above the spinal fusion was not detected. The procedure does not seem to be capable of preventing the olisthetic disc from degeneration. The theoretical benefits of direct repair could not be proven.

Posterolateral, anterior, or circumferential fusion in situ for high-grade spondylolisthesis in young patients: a long-term evaluation using the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, comparative follow-up study. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes after posterolateral, anterior, or circumferential fusion in situ for high-grade spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Controversial opinions still exist about the surgical treatment of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis. There are no long-term comparative studies of different fusion in situ techniques in these patients. METHODS: A total of 21 patients treated using posterolateral, 23 using anterior, and 26 using the circumferential fusion technique without instrumentation for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis (>or=50% slip) participated. Their mean age at surgery was 14.4 years (range 8.0-19.6). The follow-up rate was 84% after a mean of 17.2 years (range 10.7-26.0). Radiographs were obtained before surgery, at 2-year follow-up, and at final follow-up. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaires were completed, and a physical examination was performed at the final follow-up visit. RESULTS: Progression of lumbosacral kyphosis (>or=10 degrees ) was found in 9 (43%), 3 (13%), and 3 (12%) patients of the posterolateral, anterior, and circumferential fusion groups, respectively (P = 0.017). The SRS total score averaged 89.7 (range 56-105) in the posterolateral, 93.2 (range 66-114) in the anterior, and 100.0 (range 71-117) in the circumferential fusion groups (P = 0.021). Patients in the circumferential fusion group had better values for pain (P = 0.023) and function from back condition domains (P = 0.079) than patients in the posterolateral or anterior groups. The Oswestry Disability Index averaged 9.7 (range 0-62) in the posterolateral, 8.9 (range 0-32) in the anterior, and 3.0 (range 0-16) in the circumferential fusion groups (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Circumferential fusion provided significantly better long-term clinical, radiographic, and SRS total score than posterolateral or anterior fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

No correlation between patient outcome and abnormal lumbar MRI findings 21 years after posterior or posterolateral fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents.

Between 1977 and 1987, posterior (n=29) or posterolateral (n=73) fusion was performed for mild to moderate (slip <50%) isthmic spondylolisthesis on 102 patients (46 females, 56 males). The patients' average age at the time of operation was 15.9 (range, 8.1-19.8) years. Clinical (physical examination and Oswestry disability index (ODI)) and radiological (MRI and plain radiographs) examinations were performed on these patients after an average follow-up time of 21.0 (range, 26.2-15.1) years. In the radiographs, the mean slip preoperatively was 27% (range, 5-50%) and at the last follow-up visit 26% (range, 5-78%). Inside the fusion, there were a total of 148 intervertebral discs, 121 (82%) of them had decreased signal intensity in T2-weighted MR images and 113 (76%) were narrowed. Above the fusion level, 27 (27%) discs were speckled and 27 (27%) were black; 21 (21%) intervertebral disc spaces were narrowed. Two levels above the fusion level the numbers were 8 (8%), 16 (16%) and 16 (16%), respectively. Six (6%) patients had a prolapse. Degenerative facet joint hypertrophy above fusion was seen at 80 (79%) of the levels studied. When compared to healthy subjects higher frequency of disc and facet joint degeneration was found. In MR images, none of the patients had lumbar spinal stenosis inside or above the fusion. Narrowing of one or both of the neural foramina at the level of the L5-S1 interververtebral disc was noted in 32 (31%) patients. Seventeen (17%) of the patients had, usually mild, muscular atrophy of the psoas and 33 (32%) of the paraspinal muscles. There was no difference in frequency of abnormal MRI findings between patients (n=93) with ODI 20 or less compared with patients (n=9) with ODI more than 20. In situ fusion due to isthmic spondylolsthesis at adolescence is associated with moderate degenerative changes in the lumbar spine during a 20-year follow-up. Changes were most commonly found at the level of the spondylolisthesis and above fusion level. Neural foramina stenosis seems to be associated with spondylolisthesis and its severity to severity of the slip. Muscle atrophy tended to be mild. However, there was no correlation between patient outcome (ODI) and abnormal lumbar MRI findings.

Scoliosis research society outcome instrument in evaluation of long-term surgical results in spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective follow-up study of low-grade (slip < or = 50%) isthmic spondylolisthesis after posterior or posterolateral fusion in young patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire and compare it with Oswestry Disability Index and radiographic parameters in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A few studies have examined long-term patient outcome using validated questionnaires or compared it with radiographic parameters after surgery for isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients. The Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire provides patient-oriented information on back pain, cosmetic aspects, patient satisfaction, and level of activity and might therefore be suitable for evaluation of surgical outcome after isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients. However, there are no studies assessing the usefulness of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire for these patients. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients treated at a mean (range) age of 15.9 (range, 8.1-19.8) years with posterior (n = 29) or posterolateral (n = 79) in situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis participated in the present study. The follow-up rate was 83% after a mean of 20.8 (range, 15.1-25.9) years. The mean age at follow-up observation was 36.7 years. Radiographs were obtained before surgery, at 2-year follow-up observation, and at final follow-up review. The Scoliosis Research Society and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaires were completed, and a physical examination was performed at the final follow-up visit. RESULTS: Nonunion after primary operation was found in 10 (34%) patients after posterior fusion and in 10 (13%) patients after posterolateral fusion (P = 0.0017). The mean (range) anterior slip was 25.2% (0-50%) before surgery and 24.2% (0-78%) at final follow-up observation. Lumbosacral kyphosis increased significantly during the follow-up period. The Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire yielded a total of 94.0 (range, 44-114) points. On the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire, 14 (14%) patients reported back pain often or very often at rest. The Oswestry Disability Index scores averaged 8.2 (range, 0-68). There was a significant correlation between the Scoliosis Research Society total score and the Oswestry Disability Index. The percentage slip showed significant inverse correlations with the scores for appearance in clothes, attractiveness, and self image (Scoliosis Research Society questions 5, 14, and 15). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after posterolateral fusion of low-grade spondylolisthesis were satisfactory. Cosmetic aspects of this deformity should be included as one of the outcome measurements, since cosmetic questions on the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire showed inverse correlations between the amount of slip at final follow-up observation. The Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire could be used as a primary patient-oriented outcome tool after back surgery in young patients.

Long-term clinical, functional and radiological outcome 21 years after posterior or posterolateral fusion in childhood and adolescence isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Long-term radiological studies have shown that a high rate of fusion can be achieved with posterolateral spondylodesis. Radiological findings, however, do not always correlate with patient satisfaction and outcome. No studies have been conducted on the long-term results of functional outcome, including spinal mobility and trunk strength measurements, after operative treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis, as compared with the reference population. Of 129 consecutive patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis operated on with spondylodesis between 1977 and 1987, 107 (83%) participated in the study. Posterior spondylodesis was performed in 29 (27%) patients and posterolateral spondylodesis in 78 (73%) patients. The average follow-up time was 20.9 years (range 15.1-26.2 years). Radiographs obtained preoperatively and at the 2-year and final follow-ups were assessed for quality of the fusion and degenerative changes. Outcome was assessed at the last follow-up by physical examination, spinal mobility and non-dynamometric trunk strength measurements, and calculation of Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores. The fusion rate was 66% after posterior fusion and 83% after posterolateral fusion. Degenerative changes in the lumbar intervertebral discs above the fusion level were noted in 13 (12%) patients. At the final follow-up 14% of patients reported back pain often or very often. The mean ODI score was 7.6 (0-68). Moderate disability was found in 6% of patients and severe disability in 1%; one patient was crippled. No correlation was found between disc degeneration or solidity of the fusion and the ODI score. Non-dynamometric trunk strength measurements corresponded with the reference values. Lumbar flexion, but not extension, was diminished when compared with that of the reference population. The overall long-term clinical outcome is good in patients with spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis operated on with posterior or posterolateral fusion. The clinical and radiological outcomes do not, however, appear to correlate with each other. Lumbar flexion is diminished, but the patients perform, on average, as well as the general population in non-dynamometric trunk strength measurements.