ABSTRACT
Introduction: Cardiomyopathy due to myocardial iron deposition is the leading cause of death in transfusion- dependent beta-thalassemia major (ß-TM) patients. Although cardiac T2* magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used for the early detection of cardiac iron level before the onset of symptoms associated with iron overload, this expensive method is not widely available in many hospitals. Frontal QRS-T angle is a novel marker of myocardial repolarization and is associated with adverse cardiac outcomes. We aimed to investigate the relationship between cardiac iron load and f(QRS-T) angle in patients with ß-TM. Methods: The study included 95 ß-TM patients. Cardiac T2* values under 20 were considered to indicate cardiac iron overload. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of cardiac involvement. Laboratory and electrocardiography parameters, including frontal plane QRS-T angle, were compared between the two groups. Results: Cardiac involvement was detected in 33 (34%) patients. Multivariate analysis showed that frontal QRS-T angle independently predicted cardiac involvement (p < 0.001). An f(QRS-T) angle of ≥ 24.5° had a sensitivity of 78.8% and a specificity of 79% in detecting the presence of cardiac involvement. In addition, a negative correlation was found between cardiac T2* MRI value and f(QRS-T) angle. Conclusions: A widening f(QRS-T) angle could be considered a surrogate marker of MRI T2* to detect cardiac iron overload. Therefore, calculating the f(QRS-T) angle in thalassemia patients is an inexpensive and simple method for detecting the presence of cardiac involvement, especially when cardiac T2* values cannot be determined or monitored.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the first 30-day results of clinical, periprocedural asymptomatic cranial embolism, and long-term restenosis of the multidisciplinary conducted and evaluated carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedure in our patient group with real-life data. METHODS: A total of 610 patients who were subjected to consecutive CAS procedures in our center between December 2010 and February 2019 were clinically and radiologically followed up for a mean duration of 6 years. Of the 610 patients, 274 (45%) were symptomatic for carotid artery stenosis, whereas 336 (55%) were identified as asymptomatic. As embolism protection methods, distal protection, proximal protection, and double (distal + proximal) protection was used in 52%, 43%, and 0.3% of patients, respectively. RESULTS: The success rate of the CAS procedure was 96%. Procedure-related death was reported in 4 (0.6%) patients who successfully underwent the CAS procedure. Moreover, acute carotid artery stent thrombosis, hyperperfusion syndrome, periprocedural major stroke, and periprocedural minor stroke was observed in 4 (0.6%), 2 (0.3%), 2 (0.3%), and 12 (1.9%) patients, respectively. The total clinical complication rates during the first 30 periprocedural days were 1.6% (10 patients) and 3.1% (19 patients) in the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups, respectively. On cranial magnetic resonance imaging performed, asymptomatic ipsilateral cranial microembolism, asymptomatic contralateral cranial microembolism, and bilateral asymptomatic cranial microembolism was detected in 61 (11.6%), 20 (3.8%), 23 (4.4%) patients, respectively. Asymptomatic restenosis was observed in 24 (3.9%) patients. CONCLUSION: The CAS procedure is a reliable treatment option applicable with acceptable complication and success rates as outlined in the guidelines, when performed following a multidisciplinary evaluation, in the treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, including high-risk patient groups.
