Analysis of 5-year hospitalization data of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Damage is a risk factor for frequent and longer stays.

OBJECTIVE: The annual hospitalization rate of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is approximately 10%, and hospitalizations are responsible for most of the healthcare expenses. Herein, we analyzed 5-year hospitalization data of SLE patients and determined factors leading to hospitalization. METHODS: Clinical, laboratory, and hospitalization data of SLE patients admitted to our rheumatology clinic in 2015-2020 were retrieved from our SLE database and analyzed. SLICC SLE damage index (SDI) and disease activity at admission (SLEDAI-2K) were determined. RESULTS: Among 161 hospitalized patients, 86% were females. Total rheumatologic hospitalization number was 298, and 38% of the patients were hospitalized more than once (1.85 ± 1.56). The mean hospitalization duration covering all stays for each patient was 25 ± 26.5 days. Active disease, infection, and damage-related complications were first three causes of hospitalization. Compared to patients hospitalized for active disease or damage, patients hospitalized for infection had a significantly higher number of readmissions (p < .05) and their total hospital stay was longer (p < .01).The frequency of patients with damage and the mean SDI score was significantly lower in the active disease group (68%, 1.93 ± 2.05) than hospitalizations for infection (90%, 2.68 ± 1.63) and damage-related causes (96%, 3.04 ± 1.65) (p < .05). The mean SDI score and duration (r = 0.551, p < .001) and the number of hospitalizations (r = 0.393, p < .001) were positively correlated. The mean disease activity scores of patients hospitalized for active disease, infection, and damage-related reasons were 11.03 ± 6.08, 3.21 ± 2.80, and 2.96 ± 3.32, respectively (p < .001). Renal active disease was the most common (44%), followed by hematological (34.8%), articular (21.7%), and mucocutaneous (21%) activity.Ten percent of the patients all of whom had damage were admitted to intensive care unit (ICU). Total hospitalization duration, mean SDI, antiphospholipid syndrome, lupus anticoagulant, thrombocytopenia, serositis, pulmonary hypertension, history of alveolar hemorrhage, and cardiac valve involvement were associated with ICU admission (p < .05 for all). CONCLUSION: Disease activity, infections, and damage are the leading causes of hospitalization in SLE patients. Damage prolongs hospital stay and increases hospitalization rate and ICU need. Tight control of disease activity with rational use of immunosuppressive treatment is important to reduce damage and hospitalizations.

Real-world efficacy and safety of Ledipasvir + Sofosbuvir and Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir ± Dasabuvir combination therapies for chronic hepatitis C: A Turkish experience.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the real-life efficacy and tolerability of direct-acting antiviral treatments for patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with/without cirrhosis in the Turkish population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 4,352 patients with CHC from 36 different institutions in Turkey were enrolled. They received ledipasvir (LDV) and sofosbuvir (SOF)±ribavirin (RBV) orombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir±dasabuvir (PrOD)±RBV for 12 or 24 weeks. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates, factors affecting SVR, safety profile, and hepatocellular cancer (HCC) occurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: SVR12 was achieved in 92.8% of the patients (4,040/4,352) according to intention-to-treat and in 98.3% of the patients (4,040/4,108) according to per-protocol analysis. The SVR12 rates were similar between the treatment regimens (97.2%-100%) and genotypes (95.6%-100%). Patients achieving SVR showed a significant decrease in the mean serum alanine transaminase (ALT) levels (50.90±54.60 U/L to 17.00±14.50 U/L) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores (7.51±4.54 to 7.32±3.40) (p<0.05). Of the patients, 2 were diagnosed with HCC during the treatment and 14 were diagnosed with HCC 37.0±16.0 weeks post-treatment. Higher initial MELD score (odds ratio [OR]: 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-2.38; p=0.023]), higher hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.31-2.28; p=0.038), and higher serum ALT levels (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.21-1.83; p=0.042) were associated with poor SVR12. The most common adverse events were fatigue (12.6%), pruritis (7.3%), increased serum ALT (4.7%) and bilirubin (3.8%) levels, and anemia (3.1%). CONCLUSION: LDV/SOF or PrOD±RBV were effective and tolerable treatments for patients with CHC and with or without advanced liver disease before and after liver transplantation. Although HCV eradication improves the liver function, there is a risk of developing HCC.