Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Public Health ; 185: 202-208, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32653629

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to develop the Barriers to Physical Activity and Sport Questionnaire for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer/questioning (BPASQ-LGBTQ+ [encompassing all spectrums of sexuality and gender]) persons (LGBT), which measures barriers using a socio-ecological model, and to validate it through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Validation study. METHODS: First, content validity was achieved by (a) developing a bank of items, (b) discussing the adequacy of the items in a committee of experts and classifying the selected ones under three socio-ecological levels (intrapersonal, interpersonal, environmental) and (c) refining wording and relevance of the items after a pilot test. Second, 709 LGBTQ+ persons completed the questionnaire online to establish construct validity, criterion validity and internal consistency. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis revealed four underlying factors in the BPASQ-LGBTQ+, thus suggesting that the items initially considered as 'environmental barriers' could be constituting two separate factors based on social interactions or organizational aspects. Competing three- and four-factor models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The four-factor structure with two different factors accounting for environmental barriers obtained better values in all fit indices. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.745 to 0.813. Participants engaging in regular physical activity and sports reported lower scores in all the barriers subscales than their counterparts. CONCLUSION: The BPASQ-LGBTQ+ is valid and reliable to measure barriers to physical activity and sports in LGBTQ+ people across the different socio-ecological levels. It could be especially useful for understanding the complex relationships between these barriers, which is of great relevance for the design and implementation of interventions addressed to encourage physically active lifestyles among LGBTQ+ people.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Sports , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Transgender Persons , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bisexuality , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Gender Identity , Health Promotion , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sexual Behavior , Young Adult
2.
Public Health ; 166: 69-78, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30465933

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This article aims to study physical activity and the achievement of World Health Organization physical activity recommendations in university students with disabilities, and to examine differences by sex, age, disability characteristics and weight status. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional data from a wider research project conducted at the Spanish universities from Autumn 2016 to Autumn 2017 were analysed. METHODS: The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form was administered to 1103 Spanish university students with different disabilities. Nonparametric tests were performed to examine the differences in physical activity based on the interest variables. RESULTS: The mean metabolic equivalent (MET)-minutes/week was 1772.75 (±2161.00) for total physical activity, 642.93 (±1303.08) for vigorous physical activity, 344.31 (±699.53) for moderate physical activity and 785.50 (±1053.31) for walking intensity physical activity. Overall, 72.2% of the participants did not meet the recommendation of 75 min/week of vigorous physical activity, 80.3% did not meet the recommendation of 150 min/week of moderate physical activity and 63.1% did not meet any of these recommendations. Nonparametric tests revealed that students with multiple disabilities, chronic illnesses, acquired disabilities, older students, obese students and women were less active than their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: A high number of participants did not meet the World Health Organization physical activity recommendations, and some subgroups were especially inactive. Public health policies should implement interventions to encourage people with disabilities to engage in physical activity, paying extra attention to the most inactive subgroups.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Exercise/physiology , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Guidelines as Topic , Students/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Body Weight , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Universities , World Health Organization , Young Adult
3.
Cuad. psicol. deporte ; 18(2): 3-17, mayo 2018. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-173794

ABSTRACT

El presente trabajo evalúa las propiedades psicométricas de un cuestionario de Teoría de la Conducta Planeada en la actividad física en una muestra de alumnado universitario con discapacidad. El cuestionario fue administrado a 772 universitarios españoles con discapacidad. La estructura factorial se validó mediante análisis factorial confirmatorio, y para valorar la validez de criterio se llevaron a cabo correlaciones de Spearman entre los constructos de la Teoría de la Conducta Planeada y el tiempo dedicado a la actividad física. La fiabilidad se evaluó mediante el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Se evaluaron dos modelos, uno de cuatro factores y uno de cinco factores. El modelo de cinco factores fue el que mejores resultados presentó (CFI=,97; RMSEA=,057; IC 90%=,049-,066) (α=0,870). También se encontraron relaciones positivas entre todos los constructos de la Teoría de la Conducta Planeada y el tiempo dedicado a la actividad física. Los resultados muestran que el instrumento desarrollado resulta válido y fiable y sugieren que "Autoeficacia" y "Controlabilidad" deben considerarse dos factores independientes dentro del modelo. En conclusión, el cuestionario que se ofrece puede ser una herramienta útil para avanzar en el estudio de los factores psicosociales que afectan a la práctica de actividad física de las personas con discapacidad


The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of a Theory of Planned Behaviour questionnaire in physical activity in university students with disabilities. The questionnaire was administered to 772 Spanish university students with disabilities. The factorial structure was validated by confirmatory factor analysis and Spearman correlations between the Theory of Planned Behaviour constructs and time devoted to physical activity were calculated to assess criterion validity. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Two models were assessed, one with four factors and other one with five factors. The model with five factors obtained better results (CFI=,97; RMSEA=,057; IC 90%:,049-,066) (α=0,870). Positive relations between all the constructs of Theory of Planned Behaviour and the time devoted to physical activity were also found. The results show that the instrument developed is valid and reliable and they suggest that "Self-efficacy" and "Controllability" should be considered as two independent factors of the model. In conclusion, the questionnaire could be a useful tool in order to gain knowledge about the psychosocial factors that affect physical activity participation of people with disabilities


O presente trabalho avalia as propriedades psicométricas de um questionário de Teoria do Comportamento Planejado na atividade física em uma amostra de estudantes universitários com deficiência. O questionário foi administrado a 772 estudantes universitários espanhóis com deficiência. A estrutura fatorial foi validada pela análise fatorial de confirmação e para avaliar a validade do critério, as correlações de Spearman foram realizadas entre as construções da Teoria do Comportamento Planejado e o tempo dedicado à atividade física. A confiabilidade foi avaliada usando o coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Foram avaliados dois modelos, um dos quatro fatores e um dos cinco fatores. O modelo de cinco fatores mostrou os melhores resultados (CFI = 97, RMSEA = 057, IC 90% = 049-, 066) (α = 0,870). Relações positivas também foram encontradas entre todas as construções da Teoria do Comportamento Planejado e o tempo dedicado à atividade física. Os resultados mostram que o instrumento desenvolvido é válido e confiável e sugere que "Auto-eficácia" e "Controlabilidade" sejam considerados dois fatores independentes dentro do modelo. Em conclusão, o questionário oferecido pode ser uma ferramenta útil para avançar no estudo de fatores psicossociais que afetam a atividade física de pessoas com deficiência


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Physical Education and Training/trends , Sports for Persons with Disabilities/psychology , Self Efficacy , Behavioral Research/methods , Behavior Rating Scale/statistics & numerical data , Exercise/psychology , Psychological Theory
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...