ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate maternal adverse effects and perinatal and neonatal outcomes of women receiving coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccination during pregnancy. Material and Methods: Seven hundred and sixty pregnant women who were followed up in obstetrics outpatients were included in this prospective cohort study. COVID-19 vaccination and infection histories of the patients were recorded. Demographic data, including age, parity, and presence of systemic disease and adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination were recorded. Vaccinated pregnant women were compared with unvaccinated women in terms of adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes. Results: Among the 760 pregnant women who met study criteria, the data of 425 pregnant women were analyzed. Among these, 55 (13%) were unvaccinated, 134 (31%) were vaccinated before pregnancy, and 236 (56%) pregnant women were vaccinated during pregnancy. Of those who were vaccinated, 307 patients (83%) received BioNTech, 52 patients (14%) received CoronaVac, and 11 patients (3%) received both CoronaVac and BioNTech. The local and systemic adverse effect profiles of patients who received COVID-19 vaccination either before or during pregnancy were similar (p=0.159), and the most common adverse effect was injection site pain. COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy did not increase the ratio of abortion (<14 wk), stillbirth (>24 wk), preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, fetal growth restriction, second-trimester soft marker incidence, time of delivery, birth weight, preterm birth (<37 wk) or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit compared to the women who were not vaccinated during pregnacy. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy did not increase maternal local and systemic adverse effects or poor perinatal and neonatal outcomes. Therefore, regarding the increased risk of morbidity and mortality related to COVID-19 in pregnant women, the authors propose that COVID-19 vaccination should be offered to all pregnant women.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of obesity on clinical parameters and pregnancy rates in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), who have undergone ovulation induction. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study included 177 women with PCOS who presented to our gynecological endocrinology outpatient clinic for diagnosed infertility. All of the patients initially received clomiphene citrate (CC), and if CC resistance was noted, gonadotropins were used. The patients were classified into 2 groups according to BMI (<30 kg/m2=control group and ≥30 kg/m2=study group). Pregnancy was assessed by ß-hCG levels and a visible gestational sac in the endometrium. RESULTS: The demographic and hormonal parameters were similar between the groups. The mean duration of infertility was longer in the study group (p<0.05). In the study group, cycle cancellation due to CC resistance (p=0.039) and mean baseline LH levels (p=0.026) was statistically more likely than in the control group. On follow-up, 4 (9.3%) patients in the study group had conceived and 26 (19.4%) patients in the control group had conceived (p=0.041). CONCLUSION: Obesity adversely affects pregnancy rates in women with PCOS who undergo ovulation induction cycles. Clinicians should recommend weight loss in these patients before ovulation induction.
