Current clinical practice in the management of Brazilian patients with potentially resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe the routine clinical practice of physicians involved in the treatment of patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in Brazil. METHODS: Physicians were invited through email and text messages to participate in an electronic survey sponsored by the Brazilian Gastrointestinal Tumor Group (GTG) and the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (SBCO). We evaluated the relationship between variable categories numerically with false discovery rate-adjusted Fisher's exact test p values and graphically with Multiple Correspondence Analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 255 physicians answered the survey. Most (52.5%) were medical oncologists, treated patients predominantly in the private setting (71.0%), and had access to multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTDTB; 76.1%). Medical oncologists were more likely to describe neoadjuvant therapy as beneficial in the resectable setting and surgeons in the borderline resectable setting. Most physicians would use information on risk factors for early recurrence, frailty, and type of surgery to decide treatment strategy. Doctors working predominantly in public institutions were less likely to have access to MTDTB and to consider FOLFIRINOX the most adequate regimen in the neoadjuvant setting. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable differences exist in the management of localized PDAC, some of them possibly explained by the medical specialty, but also by the funding source of health care.

Liver regeneration after extensive hepatectomy in rats: effect of preoperative chemotherapy with intravenous 5-fluorouracil.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of preoperative intravenous chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil on liver regeneration in an experimental model of major hepatectomy in rats. METHODS: Wistar rats were divided into two groups of 20 animals each and submitted to 70% hepatectomy 24 h after intravenous injection of 5-fluorouracil 20 mg/kg (fluorouracil group, FG) or 0.9% saline (control group, CG). After hepatectomy, each group was subdivided into two subgroups of 10 animals each according to the day of sacrifice (24 h or 7 days). Liver weight during regeneration, liver regeneration rate using Kwon formula, and the immunohistochemical markers proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki-67 were used to assess liver regeneration. RESULTS: At early phase (24 h after hepatectomy) it was demonstrated the negative effect of 5-fluorouracil on liver regeneration when assessed by Kwon formula (p < 0.0001), PCNA analysis (p = 0.02). With regeneration process complete (7 days), it was possible to demonstrate the sustained impairment of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil on hepatocytes regeneration phenomenon when measured by Kwon formula (p = 0.009), PCNA analysis (p = 0.0001) and Ki-67 analysis (0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemotherapy with intravenous 5-fluorouracil negatively affected the mechanisms of liver regeneration after major hepatectomy in rats.

Liver regeneration after extensive hepatectomy in rats: effect of preoperative chemotherapy with intravenous 5-fluorouracil

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of preoperative intravenous chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil on liver regeneration in an experimental model of major hepatectomy in rats. Methods: Wistar rats were divided into two groups of 20 animals each and submitted to 70% hepatectomy 24 h after intravenous injection of 5-fluorouracil 20 mg/kg (fluorouracil group, FG) or 0.9% saline (control group, CG). After hepatectomy, each group was subdivided into two subgroups of 10 animals each according to the day of sacrifice (24 h or 7 days). Liver weight during regeneration, liver regeneration rate using Kwon formula, and the immunohistochemical markers proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki-67 were used to assess liver regeneration. Results: At early phase (24 h after hepatectomy) it was demonstrated the negative effect of 5-fluorouracil on liver regeneration when assessed by Kwon formula (p < 0.0001), PCNA analysis (p = 0.02). With regeneration process complete (7 days), it was possible to demonstrate the sustained impairment of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil on hepatocytes regeneration phenomenon when measured by Kwon formula (p = 0.009), PCNA analysis (p = 0.0001) and Ki-67 analysis (0.001). Conclusions: Preoperative chemotherapy with intravenous 5-fluorouracil negatively affected the mechanisms of liver regeneration after major hepatectomy in rats.

BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS ON INCIDENTAL GALLBLADDER CARCINOMA.

BACKGROUND: Incidental gallbladder cancer is defined as a cancer discovered by histological examination after cholecystectomy. It is a potentially curable disease. However, some questions related to their management remain controversial and a defined strategy is associated with better prognosis. AIM: To develop the first evidence-based consensus for management of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer in Brazil. METHODS: Sixteen questions were selected, and 36 Brazilian and International members were included to the answer them. The statements were based on current evident literature. The final report was sent to the members of the panel for agreement assessment. RESULTS: Intraoperative evaluation of the specimen, use of retrieval bags and routine histopathology is recommended. Complete preoperative evaluation is necessary and the reoperation should be performed once final staging is available. Evaluation of the cystic duct margin and routine 16b1 lymph node biopsy is recommended. Chemotherapy should be considered and chemoradiation therapy if microscopically positive surgical margins. Port site should be resected exceptionally. Staging laparoscopy before reoperation is recommended, but minimally invasive radical approach only in specialized minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary centers. The extent of liver resection is acceptable if R0 resection is achieved. Standard lymph node dissection is required for T2 tumors and above, but common bile duct resection is not recommended routinely. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to prepare safe recommendations as guidance for incidental gallbladder carcinoma, addressing the most frequent topics of everyday work of digestive and general surgeons.

Surgical cancer care in the COVID-19 era: front line views and consensus.

OBJECTIVE: to suggest a script for surgical oncology assistance in COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. METHOD: a narrative review and a "brainstorming" consensus were carried out after discussion with more than 350 Brazilian specialists and renowned surgeons from Portugal, France, Italy and United States of America. RESULTS: consensus on testing for COVID-19: 1- All patients to be operated should be tested between 24 and 48 before the procedure; 2- The team that has contact with sick or symptomatic patients should be tested; 3 - Chest tomography was suggested to investigate pulmonary changes. Consensus on protection of care teams: 1 - Use of surgical masks inside the hospitals. Use of N95 masks for all professionals in the operating room; 2 - Selection of cases for minimally invasive surgery and maximum pneumoperitoneal aspiration before removal of the surgical specimen; 2 - Optimization of the number of people in teams, with a minimum number of professionals, reducing their occupational exposure, the consumption of protective equipment and the circulation of people in the hospital environment; 3 - Isolation of contaminated patients. Priority consensus: 1- Construction of service priorities; 2 - Interdisciplinary discussion on minimally invasive or conventional pathways. CONCLUSION: the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO) suggests a script for coping with oncological treatment, remembering that the impoundment in the assistance of these cases, can configure a new wave of overload in health systems.

Challenges in surgical oncology training in Brazil: From history to a board-certified specialization.

The Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology was established over 30 years ago. Despite that, surgical oncology was finally recognized as a Board-Certified medical specialty in 2017 and has strengthened its role in the standardization of surgical and multimodal approaches in our country. This article aims to describe the process and the main challenges of the specialists training who are qualified for job opportunities and who meet the expectations of the recently created competence matrix for surgical oncologists in Brazil. Thus, we hope to expose the challenges of teaching surgical oncology, describe its history and experiences in important country services, and outline the minimum requirements for creating a more humanistic surgical oncologist who is updated and fully committed with multidisciplinary treatment for cancer patients. We conclude that the main characteristic that the surgical oncologist must have is the ability to offer holistic treatments to the patient, based on the highest level of evidence, love, and compassion, to direct the treatment and understand all of the afflictions that arise with a cancer diagnosis. Moreover, the surgical oncologist in training and in the field must be continuously updating himself to offer the best options of treatment to patients.

Surgical cancer care in the COVID-19 era: front line views and consensus / A assistência cirúrgica oncológica na era COVID-19: opiniões e consenso do campo de batalha

ABSTRACT Objective: to suggest a script for surgical oncology assistance in COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. Method: a narrative review and a "brainstorming" consensus were carried out after discussion with more than 350 Brazilian specialists and renowned surgeons from Portugal, France, Italy and United States of America. Results: consensus on testing for COVID-19: 1- All patients to be operated should be tested between 24 and 48 before the procedure; 2- The team that has contact with sick or symptomatic patients should be tested; 3 - Chest tomography was suggested to investigate pulmonary changes. Consensus on protection of care teams: 1 - Use of surgical masks inside the hospitals. Use of N95 masks for all professionals in the operating room; 2 - Selection of cases for minimally invasive surgery and maximum pneumoperitoneal aspiration before removal of the surgical specimen; 2 - Optimization of the number of people in teams, with a minimum number of professionals, reducing their occupational exposure, the consumption of protective equipment and the circulation of people in the hospital environment; 3 - Isolation of contaminated patients. Priority consensus: 1- Construction of service priorities; 2 - Interdisciplinary discussion on minimally invasive or conventional pathways. Conclusion: the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO) suggests a script for coping with oncological treatment, remembering that the impoundment in the assistance of these cases, can configure a new wave of overload in health systems.

RESUMO Objetivo: sugerir roteiro de assistência oncológica cirúrgica em meio à pandemia COVID-19 no Brasil. Método: foi realizada revisão narrativa da literatura e consenso tipo "brainstorming" após discussão com mais de 350 especialistas brasileiros e cirurgiões renomados de Portugal, França, Itália e Estados Unidos da América. Resultados: consenso sobre testagem para COVID-19: 1-Todos os pacientes a serem operados devem ser testados entre 24 e 48 antes do procedimento; 2-Equipe que tenha contato com doentes ou sintomáticos deve ser testada; 3-Tomografia de tórax foi sugerida para pesquisa de alterações pulmonares. Consenso sobre proteção das equipes de assistência: 1-Uso de máscaras cirúrgicas dentro de hospitais. Uso de máscaras N95 para todos os profissionais na sala cirúrgica; 2-Seleção dos casos para cirurgia minimamente invasiva e aspiração máxima do pneumoperitônio antes da retirada da peça cirúrgica; 2-Otimização das equipes, com número mínimo de profissionais, reduzindo a exposição ocupacional, o consumo de equipamento de proteção e a circulação de pessoas no ambiente hospitalar; 3 -Isolamento de pacientes contaminados. Consenso sobre priorizações: 1-Construção de prioridades de atendimento; 2- Discussão interdisciplinar sobre via minimamente invasiva ou convencional. Conclusão: a Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Oncológica (SBCO) sugere roteiro de enfrentamento para o tratamento oncológico, lembrando que o represamento na assistência desses casos, pode configurar uma nova onda de sobrecarga em sistemas de saúde.

Brazilian consensus on incidental gallbladder carcinoma / Consenso brasileiro de carcinoma incidental de vesícula biliar

ABSTRACT Background: Incidental gallbladder cancer is defined as a cancer discovered by histological examination after cholecystectomy. It is a potentially curable disease. However, some questions related to their management remain controversial and a defined strategy is associated with better prognosis. Aim: To develop the first evidence-based consensus for management of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer in Brazil. Methods: Sixteen questions were selected, and 36 Brazilian and International members were included to the answer them. The statements were based on current evident literature. The final report was sent to the members of the panel for agreement assessment. Results: Intraoperative evaluation of the specimen, use of retrieval bags and routine histopathology is recommended. Complete preoperative evaluation is necessary and the reoperation should be performed once final staging is available. Evaluation of the cystic duct margin and routine 16b1 lymph node biopsy is recommended. Chemotherapy should be considered and chemoradiation therapy if microscopically positive surgical margins. Port site should be resected exceptionally. Staging laparoscopy before reoperation is recommended, but minimally invasive radical approach only in specialized minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary centers. The extent of liver resection is acceptable if R0 resection is achieved. Standard lymph node dissection is required for T2 tumors and above, but common bile duct resection is not recommended routinely. Conclusions: It was possible to prepare safe recommendations as guidance for incidental gallbladder carcinoma, addressing the most frequent topics of everyday work of digestive and general surgeons.

RESUMO Racional: Carcinoma incidental da vesícula biliar é definido como uma neoplasia descoberta por exame histológico após colecistectomia videolaparoscópica. É potencialmente uma doença curável. Entretanto algumas questões relacionadas ao seu manuseio permanecem controversas e uma estratégia definida está associada com melhor prognóstico. Objetivo: Desenvolver o primeiro consenso baseado em evidências para o manuseio de pacientes com carcinoma incidental da vesícula biliar no Brasil. Métodos: Dezesseis questões foram selecionadas e para responder as questões e 36 membros das sociedades brasileiras e internacionais foram incluídos. As recomendações foram baseadas em evidências da literatura atual. Um relatório final foi enviado para os membros do painel para avaliação de concordância. Resultados: Avaliação intraoperatória da peça cirúrgica, uso de bolsas para retirar a peça cirúrgica e exame histopatológico de rotina, foram recomendados. Avaliação pré-operatória completa é necessária e deve ser realizada assim que o estadiamento final esteja disponível. Avaliação da margem do ducto cístico e biópsia de rotina do linfonodo 16b1 são recomendadas. Quimioterapia deve ser considerada e quimioradioterapia indicada se a margem cirúrgica microscópica seja positiva. Os portais devem ser ressecados excepcionalmente. O estadiamento laparoscópico antes da operação é recomendado, mas o tratamento radical por abordagem minimamente invasiva deve ser realizado apenas em centros especializados em cirurgia hepatopancreatobiliar minimamente invasiva. A extensão da ressecção hepática é aceitável até que seja alcançada a ressecção R0. A linfadenectomia padrão é indicada para tumores iguais ou superiores a T2, mas a ressecção da via biliar não é recomendada de rotina. Conclusões: Recomendações seguras foram preparadas para carcinoma incidental da vesícula biliar, destacando os mais frequentes tópicos do trabalho diário do cirurgião do aparelho digestivo e hepatopancreatobiliar.

Morbimortalidade relacionada à técnica de anastomose pancreática (ducto-mucosa x telescopagem) após cirurgia de Whipple / Morbimortality related to pancreatic anastomosis technique (duct-to-mucosa vs. telescopic) after Whipple's surgery

OBJETIVOS: A gastroduodenopancreatectomia (GDP) é atualmente a única forma de tratamento segura e eficaz para pacientes selecionados com doenças benignas e malignas do pâncreas e da região periampular. Entre as complicações pós-operatórias, a fístula pancreática continua sendo a mais importante, com uma incidência que varia de 5 a 25 por cento nas grandes séries. Os objetivos deste trabalho são os de avaliar a morbimortalidade relacionada a duas técnicas de anastomoses pancreatojejunais (ducto-mucosa X telescopagem), e comparar seus resultados. MÉTODO: Foram analisados retrospectivamente 64 pacientes submetidos à GDP, no Serviço de Cirurgia Abdômino-Pélvica, do INCA, no período de 1987 a 2002. Destes doentes, 42 foram submetidos à anastomose tipo ducto-mucosa e 22 à telescopagem. A análise estatística foi realizada através do teste de Fischer. RESULTADOS: A taxa de fístula pancreática no grupo ducto-mucosa foi de 12 por cento e no telescopagem foi 36 por cento. Esta diferença percentual se mostrou estatisticamente significativa (p = 0,02). A mortalidade operatória relacionada à fístula pancreática foi de 2,4 por cento para o grupo ducto-mucosa e 4,5 por cento para o telescopagem, com nível de significância estatística > 5 por cento. CONCLUSÕES: A técnica de anastomose pancreatojejunal tipo ducto-mucosa é associada a menores índices de fístula pancreática em relação a técnica de telescopagem, enquanto que a mortalidade operatória relacionada a fístula não mostrou diferença estatística entre os dois grupos estudados.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy has been used as a safe and appropriate surgical option in selected patients with malignant and benign disorders of the pancreas and periampullary region. Among the complications of the pancreatoduodenectomy, pancreatic anastomosis failure is the most important and sometimes fatal complication. According to recent reports, the incidence of leakage of pancreatic anastomosis after PD is high (between 5 percent and 25 percent). Our objectives were to analize the morbidity and mortality rates related to pancreatic anastomosis technique (duct-to-mucosa VS. telescopic) and to compare the results. METHODS: From January 1987 to December 2002, 64 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenal resection at Brazilian National Cancer Institute. Data were recorded retrospectively on all patients. Forty-two patients underwent pancreatojejunostomy duct-to-mucosa and the telescopic technique was performed in 22 patients. Statistical analyses were performed using the Fischer's test. RESULTS: The pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatojejunostomy duct-to-mucosa and telescopic technique was 12 percent and 36 percent, respectively (p = 0.02). The operative mortality rate after duct-to-mucosa technique was 12 percent and 36 percent after pancreatojejunostomy telescopic (p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: The leakage rate was significantly lower in patients underwent to pancreatojejunostomy duct-to-mucosa, however an operative mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups.