Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Events Associated with Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: An International Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) has emerged as an effective management approach for patients with refractory gastroparesis. This study aims to comprehensively study the safety of G-POEM and describe the predictive factors of adverse events (AEs) occurrence. METHODS: This study is a retrospective study involving 13 tertiary care centers (7 USA, 1 South America, 4 Europe, and 1 Asia). Patients who underwent G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis were included. Cases were identified by the occurrence of AEs. For each case, two controls were randomly selected and matched for age (± 10 years), gender, and etiology of gastroparesis. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients underwent G-POEM for gastroparesis. Overall, 31 (14%) AEs were encountered [mild 24 (77%), moderate 5 (16%), and severe 2 (6%)] during the duration of the study. The most common AE was abdominal pain (n = 16), followed by mucosotomy (n = 5) and capnoperitoneum (n = 4), and AEs were most commonly identified within the first 48-h post-procedure 18 (58%). The risk of adverse event occurrence was significantly higher for endoscopists with experience of < 20 G-POEM procedures (OR 3.03 [1.03-8.94], p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: G-POEM seems to be a safe intervention for refractory gastroparesis. AEs are most commonly mild and managed conservatively. Longitudinal mucosal incision, use of hook knife, use of clips for mucosal closure and endoscopist's experience with > 20 G-POEM procedures is significantly associated with decreased incidence of AEs.

A large multicenter cohort on the use of full-thickness resection device for difficult colonic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Introduction of the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) has allowed endoscopic resection of difficult lesions such as those with deep wall origin/infiltration or those located in difficult anatomic locations. The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of the FTRD among its early users in the USA. METHODS: Patients who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for lower gastrointestinal tract lesions using the FTRD at 26 US tertiary care centers between 10/2017 and 12/2018 were included. Primary outcome was R0 resection rate. Secondary outcomes included rate of technical success (en bloc resection), achievement of histologic full-thickness resection (FTR), and adverse events (AE). RESULTS: A total of 95 patients (mean age 65.5 ± 12.6 year, 38.9% F) were included. The most common indication, for use of FTRD, was resection of difficult adenomas (non-lifting, recurrent, residual, or involving appendiceal orifice/diverticular opening) (66.3%), followed by adenocarcinomas (22.1%), and subepithelial tumors (SET) (11.6%). Lesions were located in the proximal colon (61.1%), distal colon (18.9%), or rectum (20%). Mean lesion diameter was 15.5 ± 6.4 mm and 61.1% had a prior resection attempt. The mean total procedure time was 59.7 ± 31.8 min. R0 resection was achieved in 82.7% while technical success was achieved in 84.2%. Histologically FTR was demonstrated in 88.1% of patients. There were five clinical AE (5.3%) with 2 (2.1%) requiring surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this first US multicenter study suggest that EFTR with the FTRD is a technically feasible, safe, and effective technique for resecting difficult colonic lesions.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has evolved into a viable treatment modality for superficial esophageal cancer. ESD offers a distinct advantage given the ability to perform en bloc resection enabling accurate histopathologic assessment. Data from published literature has established ESD as the preferred option in the treatment of superficial squamous cell carcinoma with complete resection rates of 78-100%, and a low rate recurrence of 0-2.6%. En bloc resection for esophageal SCC is curative for tumors with M1 (intrapethelial) or M2 (invasion into the lamina propria) involvement with no lymphovascular invasion. Tumors that contain lymphovascular invasion or submucosal invasion greater than 200 µm should be treated as advanced carcinomas due to the increased risk of lymph node metastasis. In contrast, the role of ESD in Barrett's esophagus is more limited due to the high rate of efficacy of EMR. A randomized control trial comparing EMR and ESD strategies found a higher R0 resection rate for ESD, but no significant difference in complete remission from neoplasia at 3 month follow up. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has a limited role in the evaluation of superficial esophageal cancer. Alternatively, detailed endoscopic assessment along with magnification endoscopy or narrow band imaging, may provide greater utility than EUS. The most common adverse events of ESD in the esophagus include perforation and stricture. Perforation can often be managed by defect closure along with non-operative conservative management. Steroid administration with either topical or local injection can be effective management in stricture prevention. Continued refinement of ESD technique and innovation will overcome some of the current limitations of ESD and enable curative resection of superficial esophageal cancer as an alternative to invasive surgery.