What methods are used in research of firsthand experiences with online self-harming and suicidal behavior? A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Online self-harming and suicidal behavior is a novel and rapidly increasing phenomenon warranting comprehensive mapping of used research methods. AIM: To identify and map how knowledge on online self-harming and suicidal behavior is gathered, including how data are collected e.g. questionnaires and interviews. METHODS: The review follows the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Scoping Reviews in tandem with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. A keyword search of three electronic databases was conducted on two occasions, yielding 5422 records. Following duplicate removal, the records were screened based on the following inclusion criterions; (1) in English or Nordic language and published between 2011-2022, (2) presenting results for self-harming and/or suicidal behavior on social media and (3) using tools for either interview or questionnaire aiming at assessment of the experience of online self-harming and suicidal behavior from the perspective of the person who engages in the behavior. A total of 64 articles were included. RESULTS: 45 used questionnaires, 17 used interviews, and two studies mixed the two approaches. 17% of the studies had made some effort to ensure validity within the questionnaires and 15.8% gave full access to the interview guide. CONCLUSION: Research into online self-harming and suicidal behavior is characterized by a lack of validated measurements and methodological transparency. The results emphasize a need for further development, testing, and validation of questionnaires and greater openness and reflexivity in qualitative methodology to enable cross-study comparison and advance knowledge of this complex phenomenon.

The effect of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment on the rate and duration of psychiatric readmission in patients with unipolar depressive disorder: The RADMIS randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with unipolar depressive disorder are frequently hospitalized, and the period following discharge is a high-risk-period. Smartphone-based treatments are receiving increasing attention among researchers, clinicians, and patients. We aimed to investigate whether a smartphone-based monitoring and treatment system reduces the rate and duration of readmissions, more than standard treatment, in patients with unipolar depressive disorder following hospitalization. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, investigator-blinded, randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received a smartphone-based monitoring and treatment system in addition to standard treatment. The system allowed patients to self-monitor symptoms and access psycho-educative information and cognitive modules. The patients were allocated a study-nurse who, based on the monitoring data, guided and supported them. The control group received standard treatment. The trial lasted six months, with outcome assessments at 0, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: We included 120 patients with unipolar depressive disorder (ICD-10). Intention-to-treat analyses showed no statistically significant differences in time to readmission (Log-Rank p=0.9) or duration of readmissions (B=-16.41,95%CI:-47.32;25.5,p=0.3) (Primary outcomes). There were no differences in clinically rated depressive symptoms (p=0.6) or functioning (p=0.1) (secondary outcomes). The intervention group had higher levels of recovery (B=7,29, 95%CI:0.82;13,75,p=0.028) and a tendency towards higher quality of life (p=0.07), wellbeing (p=0,09) satisfaction with treatment (p=0.05) and behavioral activation (p=0.08) compared with the control group (tertiary outcomes). LIMITATIONS: Patients and study-nurses were unblinded to allocation. CONCLUSIONS: We found no effect of the intervention on primary or secondary outcomes. In tertiary outcomes, patients in the intervention group reported higher levels of recovery compared to the control group.

Reducing the rate of psychiatric re-admissions in bipolar disorder using smartphones-The RADMIS trial.

OBJECTIVES: The MONARCA I and II trials were negative but suggested that smartphone-based monitoring may increase quality of life and reduce perceived stress in bipolar disorder (BD). The present trial was the first to investigate the effect of smartphone-based monitoring on the rate and duration of readmissions in BD. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled single-blind parallel-group trial. Patients with BD (ICD-10) discharged from hospitalization in the Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark were randomized 1:1 to daily smartphone-based monitoring including a feedback loop (+ standard treatment) or to standard treatment for 6 months. Primary outcomes: the rate and duration of psychiatric readmissions. RESULTS: We included 98 patients with BD. In ITT analyses, there was no statistically significant difference in rates (hazard rate: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.54; 1.91, p = 0.88) or duration of readmission between the two groups (B: 3.67, 95% CI: -4.77; 12.11, p = 0.39). There was no difference in scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (B = -0.11, 95% CI: -2.50; 2.29, p = 0.93). The intervention group had higher scores on the Young Mania Rating Scale (B: 1.89, 95% CI: 0.0078; 3.78, p = 0.050). The intervention group reported lower levels of perceived stress (B: -7.18, 95% CI: -13.50; -0.86, p = 0.026) and lower levels of rumination (B: -6.09, 95% CI: -11.19; -1.00, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone-based monitoring did not reduce rate and duration of readmissions. There was no difference in levels of depressive symptoms. The intervention group had higher levels of manic symptoms, but lower perceived stress and rumination compared with the control group.