Evaluation of health and quality of life in apheresis patients - data from the WAA register.

OBJECTIVE: The World Apheresis Association (WAA) register contains data from more than 89 000 apheresis procedures in more than 12,000 patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate functional health and quality of life (QoL) in patients during apheresis treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Estimates of health condition (HC) were made in 40,445 and of QoL in 22112 apheresis procedures. This study focused on a 10-step graded evaluation of HC (scale from: 'bedridden, unable to eat' to a level of 'athletic competition') and self-assessment of QoL (scale from: worst ever '0' to best ever '10'). Data were compared in relation to various apheresis procedures and if the patient underwent the first or subsequent apheresis procedure. RESULTS: Of the patients treated with plasma exchange (PEX) with centrifugation technique (n = 15787) 10% were 'bedridden, unable to come out of bed' while for patients treated with plasma filtration technique (n = 1018) the percentage was 27%. During the first procedure these figures were 16% and 30%, respectively. Self-estimates of QoL were graded 'zero' or '1' in 1.6% of patients during the first apheresis procedure; At the first contact patients undergoing PEX graded like this in 4.3%. CONCLUSION: Many of the patients undergoing apheresis treatment have poor HC and QoL at the start of therapy. Of all therapeutic apheresis procedures patients undergoing PEX had the lowest score of QoL.

Distribution of indications and procedures within the framework of centers participating in the WAA apheresis registry.

The WAA apheresis registry was established in 2003 and an increasing number of centers have since then included their experience and data of their procedures. The registry now contains data of more than 74,000 apheresis procedures in more than 10,000 patients. This report shows that the indications for apheresis procedures are changing towards more oncological diagnoses and stem cell collections from patients and donors and less therapeutic apheresis procedures. In centers that continue to register, the total extent of apheresis procedures and patients treated have expanded during the latest years.

Implementing a patient blood management program in Norway: Where to start?

Norway has recently established a working group to implement a national patient blood management (PBM) program. Although benchmarking regarding blood usage is challenging in Norway due to legal barriers, a survey was sent to different hospitals to identify possible areas to be prioritized in the first phase of the PBM program. Among them, optimizing the patient's hemoglobin level before elective surgery and implementing electronic check-lists for the indication of transfusion when ordering blood products are two measures that may have a considerable impact on blood usage. The results of the survey also showed that patients may receive a red blood cell transfusion at hemoglobin levels that are higher than those internationally recommended. Since there are no national guidelines for the use of blood products, agreement regarding hemoglobin thresholds is essential to reduce variation in transfusion practice. To achieve these goals, the transfusion specialist plays a key role in promoting the principles behind the PBM concept at the local hospital.

Adverse events in apheresis: An update of the WAA registry data.

Apheresis with different procedures and devices are used for a variety of indications that may have different adverse events (AEs). The aim of this study was to clarify the extent and possible reasons of various side effects based on data from a multinational registry. The WAA-apheresis registry data focus on adverse events in a total of 50846 procedures in 7142 patients (42% women). AEs were graded as mild, moderate (need for medication), severe (interruption due to the AE) or death (due to AE). More AEs occurred during the first procedures versus subsequent (8.4 and 5.5%, respectively). AEs were mild in 2.4% (due to access 54%, device 7%, hypotension 15%, tingling 8%), moderate in 3% (tingling 58%, urticaria 15%, hypotension 10%, nausea 3%), and severe in 0.4% of procedures (syncope/hypotension 32%, urticaria 17%, chills/fever 8%, arrhythmia/asystole 4.5%, nausea/vomiting 4%). Hypotension was most common if albumin was used as the replacement fluid, and urticaria when plasma was used. Arrhythmia occurred to similar extents when using plasma or albumin as replacement. In 64% of procedures with bronchospasm, plasma was part of the replacement fluid used. Severe AEs are rare. Although most reactions are mild and moderate, several side effects may be critical for the patient. We present side effects in relation to the procedures and suggest that safety is increased by regular vital sign measurements, cardiac monitoring and by having emergency equipment nearby.