ABSTRACT
The pathophysiological development of Alzheimer's disease (AD) begins in the brain years before the onset of clinical symptoms. The accumulation of beta-amyloid (Aß) is thought to be the first cortical pathology to occur. Carrying one apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele increases the risk of developing AD at least 2-3 times and is associated with earlier Aß accumulation. Although it is difficult to identify Aß-related cognitive impairment in early AD with standard cognitive tests, more sensitive memory tests may be able to do this. We sought to examine associations between Aß and performance on three tests within three subdomains of memory, verbal, visual, and associative memory, to elucidate which of these tests were sensitive to Aß-related cognitive impairment in at-risk subjects. 55 APOE ε4 carriers underwent MRI, 11 C-Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) PET, and cognitive testing. A composite cortical PiB SUVR cut-off score of 1.5 was used to categorise subjects as either APOE ε4 Aß+ or APOE ε4 Aß-. Correlations were carried out using cortical surface analysis. In the whole APOE ε4 group, we found significant correlations between Aß load and performance on verbal, visual, and associative memory tests in widespread cortical areas, the strongest association being with performance on associative memory tests. In the APOE ε4 Aß+ group, we found significant correlations between Aß load and performance of verbal and associative, but not visual, memory in localised cortical areas. Performance on verbal and associative memory tests provides sensitive markers of early Aß-related cognitive impairment in at-risk subjects.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Apolipoprotein E4/genetics , Amyloid beta-Peptides/metabolism , Brain/pathology , Memory/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a promising diagnostic imaging tool for the diagnosis of dementia, as PET can add complementary information to the routine imaging examination with MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of MRI-based attenuation correction (MRAC) on diagnostic assessment of dementia with [18F]FDG PET. Quantitative differences in both [18F]FDG uptake and z-scores were calculated for three clinically available (DixonNoBone, DixonBone, UTE) and two research MRAC methods (UCL, DeepUTE) compared to CT-based AC (CTAC). Furthermore, diagnoses based on visual evaluations were made by three nuclear medicine physicians and one neuroradiologist (PETCT, PETDeepUTE, PETDixonBone, PETUTE, PETCT + MRI, PETDixonBone + MRI). In addition, pons and cerebellum were compared as reference regions for normalization. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference in z-scores were smallest between MRAC and CTAC with cerebellum as reference region: 0.15 ± 0.11 σ (DeepUTE), 0.15 ± 0.12 σ (UCL), 0.23 ± 0.20 σ (DixonBone), 0.32 ± 0.28 σ (DixonNoBone), and 0.54 ± 0.40 σ (UTE). In the visual evaluation, the diagnoses agreed with PETCT in 74% (PETDeepUTE), 67% (PETDixonBone), and 70% (PETUTE) of the patients, while PETCT + MRI agreed with PETDixonBone + MRI in 89% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The MRAC research methods performed close to that of CTAC in the quantitative evaluation of [18F]FDG uptake and z-scores. Among the clinically implemented MRAC methods, DixonBone should be preferred for diagnostic assessment of dementia with [18F]FDG PET/MRI. However, as artifacts occur in DixonBone attenuation maps, they must be visually inspected to assure proper quantification.
