Bivalent Llama Single-Domain Antibody Fragments against Tumor Necrosis Factor Have Picomolar Potencies due to Intramolecular Interactions.

The activity of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), a cytokine involved in inflammatory pathologies, can be inhibited by antibodies or trap molecules. Herein, llama-derived variable heavy-chain domains of heavy-chain antibody (VHH, also called Nanobodies™) were generated for the engineering of bivalent constructs, which antagonize the binding of TNF to its receptors with picomolar potencies. Three monomeric VHHs (VHH#1, VHH#2, and VHH#3) were characterized in detail and found to bind TNF with sub-nanomolar affinities. The crystal structures of the TNF-VHH complexes demonstrate that VHH#1 and VHH#2 share the same epitope, at the center of the interaction area of TNF with its TNFRs, while VHH#3 binds to a different, but partially overlapping epitope. These structures rationalize our results obtained with bivalent constructs in which two VHHs were coupled via linkers of different lengths. Contrary to conventional antibodies, these bivalent Nanobody™ constructs can bind to a single trimeric TNF, thus binding with avidity and blocking two of the three receptor binding sites in the cytokine. The different mode of binding to antigen and the engineering into bivalent constructs supports the design of highly potent VHH-based therapeutic entities.

FSAP-mediated nucleosome release from late apoptotic cells is inhibited by autoantibodies present in SLE.

Inefficient clearance of apoptotic cells and the subsequent exposure of the immune system to nuclear contents are crucially involved in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Factor VII-activating protease (FSAP) is activated in serum upon contact with dead cells, and releases nucleosomes from late apoptotic cells into the extracellular environment. We investigated whether FSAP-mediated nucleosome release from late apoptotic cells is affected in SLE patients. Nucleosome release in sera of 27 SLE patients and 30 healthy controls was investigated by incubating late apoptotic Jurkat cells with serum and analyzing the remaining DNA content by flow cytometry. We found that nucleosome release in sera of SLE patients with high disease activity was significantly decreased when compared with that in SLE sera obtained during low disease activity or from healthy individuals. Upon removal of IgG/IgM antibodies from SLE sera, nucleosome release was restored. Similarly, monoclonal antinuclear antibodies inhibited nucleosome release in healthy donor serum or by plasma-purified FSAP. This inhibition was lost when Fab fragments were used, suggesting that antigen cross-linking is involved. In conclusion, FSAP-mediated nucleosome release from late apoptotic cells is greatly impaired in SLE patient sera, possibly hampering the clearance of these cells and thereby propagating inflammation.

An improved monocyte activation test using cryopreserved pooled human mononuclear cells.

The monocyte activation test (MAT) is a promising replacement of the currently used rabbit pyrogen test to detect the presence of pyrogens in injectable drugs. In the MAT, drugs are incubated with a source of human monocytes and production of pyrogenic cytokines used as readout. The best results are obtained with human mononuclear cells (MNC). However, donor variation requires testing on four different donors, and for most laboratories access to fresh MNCs is a problem. The current study shows how to overcome these problems using frozen pooled MNCs. The MAT is performed by thawing pooled MNC and co-culture overnight with a test substance, LPS or non-endotoxin pyrogens, with IL-6 production as the readout. The study demonstrates that fresh and frozen pooled MNC have comparable sensitivity. The reproducibility of the MAT performed with different batches of frozen pooled MNC was excellent. Different non-endotoxin pyrogens induce IL-6, confirming the ability of the MAT to detect a variety of pyrogens. In conclusion, the MAT using frozen pooled MNC is a highly sensitive, specific and reproducible pyrogen test, able to detect and quantify endotoxin and non-endotoxin pyrogenic contaminations in parenteral pharmaceuticals.

Key findings towards optimising adalimumab treatment: the concentration-effect curve.

OBJECTIVE: To determine a concentration-effect curve of adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients taking into account the effect of methotrexate (MTX) on concentration and effect and to identify a therapeutic range for adalimumab concentrations. METHODS: In a prospective observational cohort study, 221 consecutive patients with RA were treated with 40 mg adalimumab subcutaneously every other week. The relationship between adalimumab trough level and clinical efficacy after 28 weeks of follow-up was determined in a concentration-effect curve. A receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve established a therapeutic cut-off concentration. The effect of MTX on adalimumab trough levels was shown by dividing patients that are and are not concomitantly using MTX in the concentration-effect curve and a concentration table. RESULTS: Clinical efficacy improved with increasing adalimumab concentration and reached a maximum (mean disease activity score in 28 joints improvement of 2) with levels between 5-8 µg/mL. Levels exceeding 8 µg/mL were illustrated to have no additional beneficial effect on disease activity. The ROC curve showed an area under the curve of 0.695 (95% CI 0.626 to 0.764) for European League Against Rheumatism response and adalimumab levels: good responders versus non-responders and moderate responders. A cut-off of 5 µg/mL had a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 43%. Adalimumab levels are influenced by concomitant MTX use: patients on adalimumab monotherapy had a median adalimumab level of 4.1 µg/mL (IQR 1.3-7.7), whereas patients concomitantly taking MTX had a median level of 7.4 µg/mL (IQR 5.3-10.6, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab trough levels in a range of 5-8 µg/mL are sufficient to reach adequate clinical response. These levels are influenced substantially by concomitant MTX use.

Functional analysis of the anti-adalimumab response using patient-derived monoclonal antibodies.

The production of antibodies to adalimumab in autoimmune patients treated with adalimumab is shown to diminish treatment efficacy. We previously showed that these antibodies are almost exclusively neutralizing, indicating a restricted response. Here, we investigated the characteristics of a panel of patient-derived monoclonal antibodies for binding to adalimumab. Single B-cells were isolated from two patients, cultured, and screened for adalimumab specificity. Analysis of variable region sequences of 16 clones suggests that the immune response against adalimumab is broad, involving multiple B-cell clones each using different combinations of V(D)J segments. A strong bias for replacement mutations in the complementarity determining regions was found, indicating an antigen-driven response. We recombinantly expressed 11 different monoclonal antibodies and investigated their affinity and specificity. All clones except one are of high affinity (Kd between 0.6 and 233 pm) and compete with TNF as well as each other for binding to adalimumab. However, binding to a panel of single-point mutants of adalimumab indicates markedly different fine specificities that also result in a differential tendency of each clone to form dimeric and multimeric immune complexes. We conclude that although all anti-adalimumab antibodies compete for binding to TNF, the response is clonally diverse and involves multiple epitopes on adalimumab. These results are important for understanding the relationship between self and non-self or idiotypic determinants on therapeutic antibodies and their potential immunogenicity.

Cooperation of factor VII-activating protease and serum DNase I in the release of nucleosomes from necrotic cells.

OBJECTIVE: Removal of dead cells is essential in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis, and efficient removal prevents exposure of intracellular content to the immune system, which could lead to autoimmunity. The plasma protease factor VII-activating protease (FSAP) can release nucleosomes from late apoptotic cells. FSAP circulates as an inactive single-chain protein, which is activated upon contact with either apoptotic cells or necrotic cells. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of FSAP in the release of nucleosomes from necrotic cells. METHODS: Necrotic Jurkat cells were incubated with serum, purified 2-chain FSAP, and/or DNase I. Nucleosome release was analyzed by flow cytometry, and agarose gel electrophoresis was performed to detect DNA breakdown. RESULTS: Incubation with serum released nucleosomes from necrotic cells. Incubation with FSAP-deficient serum or serum in which FSAP was inhibited by a blocking antibody was unable to release nucleosomes from necrotic cells, confirming that FSAP is indeed the essential serum factor in this process. Together with serum DNase I, FSAP induced the release of DNA from the cells, the appearance of nucleosomes in the supernatant, and the fragmentation of chromatin into eventually mononucleosomes. CONCLUSION: FSAP and DNase I are the essential serum factors that cooperate in necrotic cell DNA degradation and nucleosome release. We propose that this mechanism may be important in the removal of potential autoantigens.

A preliminary algorithm introducing immunogenicity assessment in the management of patients with RA receiving tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical remission is today the treatment goal for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which requires fast and assertive therapeutic decisions for a tight control of disease activity. Few objective parameters are available to guide clinical decisions, particularly in switcher patients. We designed a preliminary algorithm introducing immunogenicity assessment in the current approach to patients with RA receiving tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concordance between the new algorithm and current clinical practice, comparing the effectiveness of 'immunogenicity-based' versus 'empirical-based' switches in a cohort of patients with established RA receiving biologics. METHODS: EULAR therapeutic response was evaluated in 105 patients with RA (naive or switchers) over one year, through generalised estimation equation (GEE) analyses. Serum drug trough levels were assessed by ELISA and antidrug antibodies (ADAb) by Bridging ELISA. RESULTS: During follow-up, 48.6% of patients had therapeutic decisions concordant with the proposed algorithm (Group A), and 51.4% had discordant decisions (Group B). One year after the therapeutic decision, patients from Group A had a higher probability of achieving response (OR=7.91, p<0.001, 95% CI 3.27 to 19.13) and low disease activity (OR=9.77, p<0.001, 95% CI 4.69 to 20.37) than patients in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: Immunogenicity assessment might help to optimise therapeutic decisions, leading to a better control of disease activity with significantly better clinical outcomes in patients with RA receiving TNFi.

The minipig as an alternative non-rodent model for immunogenicity testing using the TNFα blockers adalimumab and infliximab.

Immunogenicity is a major issue of concern for monoclonal antibodies used in human diseases and is by default mainly determined in non-human primates (NHP), as target molecules are considered most similar in NHP compared to human. In this manuscript the predictive value of immunogenicity testing in minipigs for human safety is evaluated, as the immune system of the pig is functionally similar to that in other mammalian species. Adalimumab and infliximab (both monoclonal antibodies blocking TNFα) were used as model substances. Female Göttingen minipigs (4/group) were treated every other week with low (0.1 mg/kg), mid (1.0 mg/kg), or high dose (5 mg/kg) adalimumab or 5 mg/kg infliximab subcutaneous (SC) over a period of 8 weeks. After first and last dosing, pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were measured on several time points. Furthermore, hematology, clinical chemistry, body weight, clinical signs, and histopathology of several organs were evaluated. No signs of toxicity of the treatments were observed in the limited organs and tissues collected. Eleven out of 12 minipigs treated with adalimumab elicited a detectable ADA response. Induction of ADA was correlated with decreased plasma levels of adalimumab. Infliximab clearance was comparable after first and last dose. Therefore, the presence of ADA directed to infliximab was considered highly unlikely. It was concluded that the minipig and NHP showed comparable suitability for immunogenicity prediction in humans. More studies with other biopharmaceutical products are needed to strengthen the status of the minipig as an alternative model for immunotoxicity testing including immunogenicity.

Long-term measurement of anti-adalimumab using pH-shift-anti-idiotype antigen binding test shows predictive value and transient antibody formation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies are effective drugs for many different diseases. However, the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against a biological can result in reduced clinical response in some patients. Measurement of ADA in the presence of (high) drug levels is difficult due to drug interference in most assays, including the commonly used antigen binding test (ABT). METHODS: We recently published a novel method which enables the measurement of complexed antibodies against adalimumab (an anti-TNF antibody) in the presence of drug. Here we use this pH-shift-anti-idiotype ABT (PIA) to measure anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) in 99 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated for up to 3 years with adalimumab. RESULTS: 53 out of 99 RA patients produced AAA. In 50 of these PIA positive patients, AAA could be detected within the first 28 weeks of treatment. Patients in which AAA could be detected in the PIA after 28 weeks of treatment were more prone to declining adalimumab levels (<5 µg/ml) (p<0.01) and high AAA levels which could be detected in the ABT (p<0.05) at later time points. We observed transient AAA formation in 17/53 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that AAA develop early in treatment. However, levels that completely neutralise the drug may be reached much later in treatment. Furthermore, the patients positive for PIA at 28 weeks have an increased chance to develop clinical non-response due to immunogenicity. In some of the patients, AAA formation is transient.

Adalimumab elicits a restricted anti-idiotypic antibody response in autoimmune patients resulting in functional neutralisation.

OBJECTIVES: Millions of patients worldwide are treated with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. These biological therapeutics can be immunogenic, resulting in anti-drug antibody formation which leads to loss of response. Fully human biological agents, such as the anti-tumour necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) antibody adalimumab, are considered to be weakly immunogenic, but anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) were recently detected in more than half of treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) within 28 weeks of treatment. A study was undertaken to determine the mechanism by which AAA lead to loss of response. METHODS: The specificity of the repertoire of AAA was investigated in a cohort of 50 AAA-positive RA patients. Inhibition experiments using TNFα and patient-derived anti-adalimumab monoclonal antibodies were performed. RESULTS: The antibody response against adalimumab is highly restricted: Fab fragments of a single monoclonal antibody specific for the idiotype of adalimumab inhibited 98.65% (25th-75th percentiles: 98.25-99.90) of the total anti-adalimumab reactivity in serum from 50 AAA-positive patients. The anti-adalimumab response was confined to the TNFα binding region of adalimumab, thereby neutralising its therapeutic efficacy. In line with this restricted specificity, small immune complexes were found in the circulation of AAA-forming patients. CONCLUSIONS: The humoral immune response against adalimumab is highly restricted and limited to the idiotype of the therapeutic antibody. All antibodies result in functional neutralisation of the drug, thereby providing a mechanism by which AAA formation leads to clinical non-response.

IgG4 production against adalimumab during long term treatment of RA patients.

PURPOSE: A substantial part of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is chronically treated with adalimumab. Some of these patients produce antibodies against adalimumab, which correlate with lower serum drug levels and reduced clinical response. Long term exposure to antigens may result in antigen specific IgG4 production as was demonstrated in studies on prolonged exposure to antigens such as different allergens, Factor VIII and IFN-ß. Here, we investigate whether long term treatment of RA patients with the therapeutic monoclonal antibody adalimumab leads to the production of specific IgG4 antibodies. METHODS: We developed radio immunoassays to detect total IgG or IgG4 against adalimumab and applied these in a cohort of 271 consecutive RA patients during 3 years of adalimumab treatment. RESULTS: In 32 % of the 271 patients antibodies against adalimumab were detectable. IgG4 antibodies were detected in 29 % of the patients. The proportion IgG4 of total IgG against adalimumab varies widely between patients, and IgG4 was found to contribute significantly to the anti drug antibody (ADA) response in some patients. CONCLUSION: In the immune response against adalimumab in adalimumab-treated RA patients a considerable part of the ADA is IgG4. Although IgG4 is often considered to be harmless due to its lack of effector function, neutralization of adalimumab by IgG4 antibodies will lead to a reduced clinical response.

Antibodies to constant domains of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: anti-hinge antibodies in immunogenicity testing.

Rheumatoid factors are antibodies directed against IgG that may confound immunogenicity testing for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. We developed antigen-binding assays to monitor anti-drug-antibody (ADA) responses against infliximab and adalimumab using F(ab')2 fragments of the drug. This avoids possible detection of rheumatoid factor activity. During development of these assays, a number of sera from patients before treatment as well as several healthy control sera were tested positive. None of these sera contained antibodies specific for the therapeutic mAb. Instead, they were found to contain anti-hinge antibodies. We demonstrate that this aspecific antibody binding can be inhibited by adding F(ab')2 of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), which consists of pooled polyclonal IgG derived from plasma. Using this protocol, anti-infliximab antibodies can be measured specifically without interference by anti-hinge antibodies.

Differential effect of drug interference in immunogenicity assays.

The presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in adalimumab-treated patients is associated with reduced serum adalimumab levels and a lower clinical response. Currently, there is no standard for measurement of anti-drug antibodies and many factors influence the results. Consequently, the incidence of ADA as reported in different studies varies considerably. Here we investigated the differential effect of drug interference in two common types of assays used to measure anti-adalimumab: an antigen binding test (ABT) and a more often-used bridging elisa. We measured ADA to adalimumab in a cohort of 216 rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with adalimumab for 28 weeks. Only 15 samples (7%) were positive in the bridging elisa, compared to 29 (13%) in the ABT, despite the fact that the bridging elisa was the most sensitive assay. Furthermore, in an ABT specific for IgG4, 48 samples (22%) were found positive. The bridging elisa was found to detect only the bivalent form of (drug-specific) IgG4, resulting in an underestimation of ADA levels. However, the predominant reason for the different outcomes of these assays was a differential susceptibility to drug interference. In particular, the bridging elisa only detected ADA in the absence of detectable amounts of circulating adalimumab and is therefore not suited for measurement of ADA in complex with the drug. In summary, we showed that a bridging elisa is susceptible to drug interference and typically measures ADA only in absence of detectable drug levels.

Changes of ferritin and CRP levels in melanoma patients treated with adjuvant interferon-α (EORTC 18952) and prognostic value on treatment outcome.

Adjuvant therapy with interferon-α (IFN) only benefits a small subgroup of melanoma patients and a predictive marker selecting responders does not exist. IFN induces increased ferritin and decreased C-reactive protein (CRP) levels; however, an association with treatment effect was not studied. Serum was collected from patients participating in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 18 952 trial comparing adjuvant treatment with IFN to observation. Serial ferritin and CRP levels were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, before treatment and up to 24 months. Ferritin levels are influenced by sex and age; therefore ratios of serial ferritin and CRP values with corresponding pretreatment values were calculated. Cox regression model and landmark method at end of induction and 6 months were used to evaluate the association between ferritin, CRP and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Baseline ferritin levels were comparable in the two treatment groups (P=0.92). However, ferritin ratios were significantly higher in IFN-treated patients (N=96) compared with untreated patients (N=21) at end of induction (mean: 2.88 vs. 0.75; P=0.0003) and at 6 months (mean: 3.18 vs. 1.02; P=0.009). In the IFN arm, higher ferritin ratios at end of induction and at 6 months were not associated with improved outcome (respectively, P=0.66 and 0.86). Concerning CRP ratios, no differences between the treatment groups, neither an association with DMFS, were observed. Administration of IFN in melanoma patients induced increase in ferritin levels but not in CRP levels. Ferritin and CRP ratios have no prognostic value regarding DMFS.

Development of antidrug antibodies against adalimumab and association with disease activity and treatment failure during long-term follow-up.

CONTEXT: Short-term data on the immunogenicity of monoclonal antibodies showed associations between the development of antidrug antibodies and diminished serum drug levels, and a diminished treatment response. Little is known about the clinical relevance of antidrug antibodies against these drugs during long-term follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To examine the course of antidrug antibody formation against fully human monoclonal antibody adalimumab and its clinical relevance during long-term (3-year) follow-up of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study February 2004-September 2008; end of follow-up was September 2010. All 272 patients were diagnosed with RA and started treatment with adalimumab in an outpatient clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease activity was monitored and trough serum samples were obtained at baseline and 8 time points to 156 weeks. Serum adalimumab concentrations and antiadalimumab antibody titers were determined after follow-up. Treatment discontinuation, minimal disease activity, and clinical remission were compared for patients with and without antiadalimumab antibodies. RESULTS: After 3 years, 76 of 272 patients (28%) developed antiadalimumab antibodies--51 of these (67%) during the first 28 weeks of treatment. Patients without antiadalimumab antibodies had much higher adalimumab concentrations (median, 12 mg/L; IQR, 9-16 mg/L) compared with patients with antibody titers from 13 to 100 AU/mL (median, 5 mg/L; IQR, 3-9 mg/L; regression coefficient, -4.5; 95% CI, -6.0 to -2.9; P < .001) and also those greater than 100 AU/mL (median, 0 mg/L; IQR, 0-3 mg/L; regression coefficient, -7.1; 95% CI, -8.4 to -5.8; P < .001). Patients with antiadalimumab antibodies more often discontinued participation due to treatment failure (n = 29 [38%]; hazard ratio [HR], 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6-5.5; P < .001) compared with antiadalimumab antibody-negative ones (n = 28 [14%]). Ninety-five of 196 patients (48%) without antiadalimumab antibodies had minimal disease activity vs 10 of 76 patients (13%) with antiadalimumab antibodies; patients with antiadalimumab antibodies less often had sustained minimal disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) (< 3.2; HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.8-7.2; P < .001) compared with antiadalimumab antibody-negative ones. Three of 76 patients (4%) with antiadalimumab antibodies achieved sustained remission compared with 67 of 196 (34%) antiadalimumab antibody-negative ones; patients with antiadalimumab antibodies less often achieved remission (DAS28 < 2.6; HR, 7.1; 95% CI, 2.1-23.4; P < .001) compared with antiadalimumab antibody-negative ones. CONCLUSION: Among outpatients with RA in whom adalimumab was started over 3 years, the development of antidrug antibodies was associated with lower adalimumab concentration and lower likelihood of minimal disease activity or clinical remission.

Activation of factor VII-activating protease in human inflammation: a sensor for cell death.

INTRODUCTION: Cell death is a central event in the pathogenesis of sepsis and is reflected by circulating nucleosomes. Circulating nucleosomes were suggested to play an important role in inflammation and were demonstrated to correlate with severity and outcome in sepsis patients. We recently showed that plasma can release nucleosomes from late apoptotic cells. Factor VII-activating protease (FSAP) was identified to be the plasma serine protease responsible for nucleosome release. The aim of this study was to investigate FSAP activation in patients suffering from various inflammatory diseases of increasing severity. METHODS: We developed ELISAs to measure FSAP-C1-inhibitor and FSAP-α2-antiplasmin complexes in plasma. FSAP-inhibitor complexes were measured in the plasma of 20 adult patients undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy, 32 adult patients suffering from severe sepsis and 8 from septic shock and 38 children suffering from meningococcal sepsis. RESULTS: We demonstrate plasma FSAP to be activated upon contact with apoptotic and necrotic cells by an assay detecting complexes between FSAP and its target serpins α2-antiplasmin and C1-inhibitor, respectively. By means of that assay we demonstrate FSAP activation in post-surgery patients, patients suffering from severe sepsis, septic shock and meningococcal sepsis. Levels of FSAP-inhibitor complexes correlate with nucleosome levels and correlate with severity and mortality in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest FSAP activation to be a sensor for cell death in the circulation and that FSAP activation in sepsis might be involved in nucleosome release, thereby contributing to lethality.

Influence of immunogenicity on the efficacy of long-term treatment with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinical relevance of the production of anti-infliximab antibodies (anti-infliximab Abs) in patients with RA undergoing infliximab treatment over a prolonged period of time. METHODS: Clinical characteristics, serum trough infliximab and antibody levels were evaluated in 85 RA patients treated with infliximab for a median of 4.42 (interval 0.4-10.2) years. DAS in 28 joints (DAS-28), EULAR response criteria and survival of treatment were assessed at 3 time points (6 months, 12 months and >4 years). RESULTS: Antibodies against infliximab were detected in 28 (32.9%) patients and were present in all EULAR non-responder patients. Antibody levels were higher in EULAR non-responders throughout the study period (P = 0.05 at 6 months, P = 0.02 at 1 year, P = 0.003 at >4 years) compared with EULAR (good and moderate) responders. Nine (10.5%) patients, all of them with high-serum anti-infliximab Ab levels, developed infusion-related reactions. Patients with anti-infliximab Abs more often required increased infliximab doses (51.7%) (P = 0.032) and median survival time on treatment was shorter (4.15 vs 8.89 years) (P = 0.0006). MTX co-therapy was not associated with lower proportion of anti-infliximab Ab-positive patients, but those receiving both infliximab and MTX had lower levels of anti-infliximab Abs (P = 0.073) and longer survival (P = 0.015) on treatment. CONCLUSION: The formation of anti-infliximab Abs during treatment with infliximab is associated with a loss of clinical response, the appearance of infusion reactions and discontinuation of treatment.

Measurement of serum levels of natalizumab, an immunoglobulin G4 therapeutic monoclonal antibody.

Human immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) is a poor trigger of effector functions and, therefore, is the preferred subclass for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies that merely aim to block their in vivo targets. An example is natalizumab, a recombinant IgG4 antibody directed against α4-integrin and used for treatment of multiple sclerosis. Efficient treatment requires that the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies can be accurately monitored. For natalizumab, this requires special precautions due to recently reported structural peculiarities of human IgG4. Here we describe the development of an assay to determine serum levels of natalizumab. Compared with other IgG subclasses, human IgG4 possesses unique structural properties that influence its interactions in both in vivo and in vitro settings. Thus, IgG4 undergoes Fab arm exchange in vivo, resulting in effectively monovalent antibodies. Furthermore, IgG4 is able to bind to other human and nonhuman IgG via Fc interactions. We demonstrate how these features can interfere with measurement of specific IgG4 and describe how we addressed these issues, resulting in an assay that is not sensitive to Fab arm exchange by natalizumab or to IgG4 Fc interactions.

The presence or absence of antibodies to infliximab or adalimumab determines the outcome of switching to etanercept.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the reason for non-response (caused by immunogenicity or not) to a first tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor defines whether a second TNF inhibitor will be effective. METHODS: This cohort study consisted of 292 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), all treated with etanercept. A total of 89 patients (30%) were treated previously with infliximab or adalimumab ('switchers'), and the remaining 203 (70%) were anti-TNF naive. All switchers were divided into two groups: with and without antibodies against the previous biological. Differences in clinical response to etanercept between switchers with and without antibodies and patients who were anti-TNF naive were assessed after 28 weeks of treatment using changes in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28). RESULTS: After 28 weeks of treatment, response to etanercept did not differ between patients who were anti-TNF naive and switchers with anti-drug antibodies (ΔDAS28=2.1 ± 1.3 vs ΔDAS28=2.0 ± 1.3; p = 0.743). In contrast, switchers without anti-drug antibodies had a diminished response to etanercept treatment compared to patients who were TNF naive (ΔDAS28 =1.2±1.3 vs ΔDAS28 = 2.1 ± 1.3; p = 0.001) and switchers with antibodies (ΔDAS28 =1.2±1.3 vs ΔDAS28 = 2.0 ± 1.3; p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Patients with RA with an immunogenic response against a first TNF-blocking agent had a better clinical response to a subsequent TNF blocker compared to patients with RA without anti-drug antibodies. Hence, determining immunogenicity can be helpful in deciding in which patient switching could be beneficial and can be part of a personalised treatment regimen.

Label-free assessment of high-affinity antibody-antigen binding constants. Comparison of bioassay, SPR, and PEIA-ellipsometry.

Assessment of high-affinity antibody-antigen binding parameters is important in such diverse areas as selection of therapeutic antibodies, detection of unwanted hormones in cattle and sensitive immunoassays in clinical chemistry. Label-free assessment of binding affinities is often carried out by immobilization of one of the binding partners on a biosensor chip, followed by monitoring the binding equilibrium of the other partner. However, for the measurement of high-affinity binding, with dissociation constants in the picomolar range or lower, equilibration times exceed practical limits and one has to resort to the measurement of sorption kinetics. Here we evaluate a new technique, using PEIA(1)-ellipsometry and establishment of equilibrium in solution. Binding parameters are determined for two high-affinity anti-interleukin 6 antibodies, anti-IL6.16 and anti-IL6.8, and compared with values obtained by a bioassay, based on IL6-dependent cell growth, and with values obtained by a standard technique based on SPR.(2) The high affinities of both antibodies as found with the bioassay (5 and 50pM for anti-IL6.8 and anti-IL6.16, respectively), could be conveniently measured by PEIA-ellipsometry. Using SPR, equilibrium measurements indeed proved too time-consuming and analysis of adsorption/desorption kinetics revealed that the binding of the antibodies on the chip caused the appearance of different populations of antibodies with different affinities.