Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 41(7): 623-30, 2012 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23040672

ABSTRACT

Restructuring the surgery and gynecology-obstetrics departments taking place now raise many interrogations. It appears as a mandatory necessity to some people and as a tribute to financial strategies to others to the detriment of quality and accessibility of care. Its effect is to clarify a good amount of socioeconomical and medical indicators. The plans of perinatality for the obstetrical aspect and the thresholds of activity for the surgical aspect constitute the major lines of these restructurings. A survey soliciting all the French public hospitals was used to assess the state of obstetrics and gynecology departments in the light of these recent restructurings. Medical demography, preserving and improving the quality and continuity of care, efficiency of the technical supports are discriminating criteria of the involved challenges. Such restructurings have an impact on the doctor's lives, which looks globally positive and a good omen to complete this remodeling process. The activity was safeguarded by a redistribution and a refocusing of institutions. One should not minimize the social impact of these changes, with a potential deterioration of working conditions (internal professional reclassifications, mobility obligation towards other sites). It thus appears that the deep changes which affect the small size institutions will be able to achieve well only if they are clearly done (information) and truly integrated in their medical project.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Public/trends , Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital/trends , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/trends , Gynecology , Health Care Surveys , Hospitals, Public/economics , Humans , Obstetrics , Personnel, Hospital , Physicians , Pregnancy , Quality of Health Care
2.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 35(9): 757-63, 2007 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17707672

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of obstetrician and patient respectively on mode of delivery in case of breech presentation at term. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all women with a singleton pregnancy in a breech presentation delivered at term in a tertiary care maternity unit from January 1998 to December 2004. Mode of delivery was suggested by a score based on maternal age, parity, obstetrical past history, radiopelvimetry and cephalopelvic confrontation. The obstetrician was free to follow or not the score indication and patient's informed consent was required concerning the mode of delivery. Our main outcome measurements were mode of delivery and neonatal parameters. RESULTS: Two hundred cases were identified. Elective cesarean section increased progressively (from 52% in 1998 to 80% in 2004 [P=0,002]). Neonatal status and proportion of score in favour of vaginal birth remained stable during the study period. The rise in cesarean section rate was mainly due to patient's request (P=0,001) whereas the trend of obstetrician in favour of cesarean did not reach significance (P=0,3). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The rise of elective cesarean section for term breech delivery in a maternity unit using a predefinite score is mainly induced by patient's request. This evolution has no effect on neonatal status.


Subject(s)
Breech Presentation , Delivery, Obstetric , Breech Presentation/psychology , Delivery, Obstetric/psychology , Female , Humans , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Physician-Patient Relations , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL