Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(3): e1147-e1150, 2022 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35226639

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) visits for behavioral health (BH) emergencies continue to rise, and institutions across the country encounter barriers and struggle to put BH processes in place to address their needs. After learning of an unanticipated closure of a local psychiatric crisis response center (CRC), our ED implemented quality improvement interventions to respond to an acute surge of BH patients. METHODS: Interventions included an enhanced BH database, the role of social workers as extenders, shared electronic health record documentation, increased staffing, clinical pathway updates, and processes to improve communication. We aimed to develop a care model to maintain safe care with timely evaluation and patient disposition despite an anticipated surge of ED patients. RESULTS: After the CRC closure, 7383 patients met our cohort definition over 18 months, whereas 4326 patients met the cohort definition in the 18 months prior the CRC closure. Of the total patients seen in the study period, 42% were evaluated by the ED team with psychiatry and social work, and the median length of stay for discharged patients evaluated by this team decreased from 4.2 hours to 3.5 hours after CRC closure. CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted approach allowed our ED to successfully respond to an unexpected surge of BH patients. Other institutions may be able to apply a population health and quality improvement approach when addressing the rising prevalence of ED BH visits. Future studies and practices should explore the optimal role of the acute care setting in the continuum of care of these patients.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Psychiatry , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Length of Stay , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Discharge
2.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(1): e1-e4, 2022 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33003131

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the cohort of missed sepsis patients since implementation of an electronic sepsis alert in a pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care children's hospital ED from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017. Missed patients met international consensus criteria for severe sepsis requiring intensive care unit admission within 24 hours of ED stay but were not treated with the sepsis pathway/order set in the ED. We evaluated characteristics of missed patients compared with sepsis pathway patients including alert positivity, prior intensive care unit admission, and laboratory testing via medical record review. Outcomes included timeliness of antibiotic therapy and need for vasoactive medications. RESULTS: There were 919 sepsis pathway patients and 53 (5%) missed patients during the study period. Of the missed patients, 41 (77%) had vital signs that flagged the sepsis alert. Of these 41 patients, 13 (32%) had a documented sepsis huddle where the team determined that the sepsis pathway was not indicated and 28 (68%) had no sepsis alert-related documentation. Missed patients were less likely to receive timely antibiotics (relative risk, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.7) and more likely to require vasoactive medications (relative risk, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.9-6.5) compared with sepsis patients. CONCLUSIONS: In an ED with an electronic sepsis alert, missed patients often had positive sepsis alerts but were not treated for sepsis. Missed patients were more likely than sepsis pathway patients to require escalation of care after admission and less likely to receive timely antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Sepsis , Child , Electronics , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/drug therapy , Vital Signs
3.
Resusc Plus ; 6: 100117, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34223376

ABSTRACT

STUDY AIM: To determine the impact of high-frequency CPR training on performance during simulated and real pediatric CPR events in a pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: Prospective observational study. A high-frequency CPR training program (Resuscitation Quality Improvement (RQI)) was implemented among ED providers in a children's hospital. Data on CPR performance was collected longitundinally during quarterly retraining sessions; scores were analyzed between quarter 1 and quarter 4 by nonparametric methods. Data on CPR performance during actual patient events was collected by simultaneous combination of video review and compression monitor devices to allow measurement of CPR quality by individual providers; linear mixed effects models were used to analyze the association between RQI components and CPR quality. RESULTS: 159 providers completed four consecutive RQI sessions. Scores for all CPR tasks during retraining sessions significantly improved during the study period. 28 actual CPR events were captured during the study period; 49 observations of RQI trained providers performing CPR on children were analyzed. A significant association was found between the number of prior RQI sessions and the percent of compressions meeting guidelines for rate (ß coefficient -0.08; standard error 0.04; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Over a 15 month period, RQI resulted in improved performance during training sessions for all skills. A significant association was found between number of sessions and adherence to compression rate guidelines during real patient events. Fewer than 30% of providers performed CPR on a patient during the study period. Multicenter studies over longer time periods should be undertaken to overcome the limitation of these rare events.

4.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 37(5): 286-289, 2021 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33903290

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has challenged hospitals and pediatric emergency department (PED) providers to rapidly adjust numerous facets of the care of critically ill or injured children to minimize health care worker (HCW) exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to iteratively devise protocols and processes that minimized HCW exposure while safely and effectively caring for children who may require unanticipated aerosol-generating procedures. METHODS: As part of our PED's initiative to optimize clinical care and HCW safety during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, regular multidisciplinary systems and process simulation sessions were conducted. These sessions allowed us to evaluate and reorganize patient flow, test and improve communication modalities, alter the process for consultation in resuscitations, and teach and reinforce the appropriate donning and use of personal protective equipment. RESULTS: Simulation was a highly effective method to disseminate new practices to PED staff. Numerous workflow modifications were implemented as a result of our in situ systems and process simulations. Total number of persons in the resuscitation room was minimized, use of a "command post" with remote providers was initiated, communication devices and strategies were trialed and adopted, and personal protective equipment standards that optimized HCW safety and communication were enacted. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation can be an effective and agile tool in restructuring patient workflow and care of the most critically ill or injured patients in a PED during a novel pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Computer Simulation , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Resuscitation/methods , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Humans
6.
J Vasc Access ; 22(2): 232-237, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32597357

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if nurses can reliably perform ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement in children with a high success rate after an initial training period. A secondary aim was to analyze complication rates of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters. METHODS: A database recorded all ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter encounters in the emergency department from November 2013 to April 2019 including the emergency department nurse attempting placement, number of attempts, and whether it was successful. Patient electronic medical records were reviewed for the time of and reason for intravenous removal.The probabilities of first-attempt successful intravenous placement and complication at successive encounters after an initial training period were calculated. These probabilities were plotted versus encounter number to graph best-fit logarithmic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 83 nurses completed a standardized training program in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement including 10 supervised ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placements. In total, 87% (3513/4053) of the ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placed after the training program were successful on the first attempt. The probability of successfully placing an ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter increased as nurses had more experience placing ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters (R2 = 0.18) and was 83% at 10 encounters.Twenty-five percent (904/3646) of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters had complications, and there was no statistically significant relationship between the number of encounters per nurse and complication rates (R2 < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Nurses can reliably place ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters at a high success rate after an initial training period. First-attempt success rates were high and increased from 67% to 83% for the first 10 unsupervised encounters after training and remained high. The complication rate was low and did not change as nurses gained more experience.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Peripheral/nursing , Clinical Competence , Emergency Service, Hospital , Nurse's Role , Pediatric Nursing , Ultrasonography, Interventional/nursing , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Databases, Factual , Education, Nursing, Continuing , Humans , Inservice Training , Learning Curve , Pediatric Nursing/education , Quality Improvement , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Interventional/adverse effects
7.
Resuscitation ; 153: 37-44, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32505613

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe chest compression (CC) quality by individual providers in two pediatric emergency departments (EDs) using video review and compression monitor output during pediatric cardiac arrests. METHODS: Prospective observational study. Patients <18 yo receiving CC for >1 min were eligible. Data was collected from video review and CC monitor device in a synchronized fashion and reported in 'segments' by individual providers. Univariate comparison by age (<1 yo, 1-8 yo, >8 yo) was performed by chi-square testing for dichotomous variables ('high-quality' CPR) and nonparametric testing for continuous variables (CC rate and depth). Univariate comparison of ventilation rate (V) was made between segments with an advanced airway versus without. RESULTS: 524 segments had data available; 42/524 (8%) met criteria for 'high-quality CC'. Patients >8 yo had more segments meeting criteria (18% vs. 2% and 0.5%; p < 0.001). Segments compliant for rate were less frequent in <1 yo (17% vs. 24% vs. 27%; p = 0.03). Segments compliant for depth were less frequent in <1 year olds and 1-8 year olds (5% and 9% vs. 20%, p < 0.001.) Mean V for segments with an advanced airway was higher than with a natural airway (24 ±â€¯18 vs. 14 ±â€¯10 bpm, p < 0.001). Hyperventilation was more prevalent in CPR segments with an advanced airway (66% vs. 32%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CC depth is rarely guideline compliant in infants. Hyperventilation is more prevalent during CPR periods with an advanced airway in place. Measuring individual provider CPR quality is feasible, allowing future studies to evaluate the impact of CPR training.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Heart Arrest , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital , Heart Arrest/therapy , Humans , Infant , Monitoring, Physiologic , Prospective Studies
9.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 36(2): 63-65, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31929394

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare timeliness of sepsis recognition and initial treatment in patients with and without high-risk comorbid conditions. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to a pediatric emergency department (ED) who triggered a vital sign-based electronic sepsis alert resulting in bedside "huddle" assessment per institutional practice. A positive sepsis alert was defined as age-specific tachycardia or hypotension, concern for infection, and at least 1 of the following: abnormal capillary refill, abnormal mental status, or a high-risk condition. High-risk conditions were derived from the American Academy of Pediatrics sepsis alert tool. Patients with a positive alert underwent bedside huddle resulting in a decision regarding initiation of sepsis protocol. Placement on the protocol and time to initiation of protocol and individual therapies were compared for patients with and without high-risk conditions. RESULTS: During the 1-year study period, there were 1107 sepsis huddle alerts out of 96,427 ED visits. Of these, 713 (65%) had identified high-risk conditions, and 394 (35%) did not. Among patients with sepsis huddles, there was no difference in sepsis protocol initiation for patients with high-risk conditions compared with those without (24.8% vs 22.0%, P = 0.305). Between patients with high-risk conditions and those without, there were no differences in median time from triage to sepsis protocol activation, triage to initial intravenous antibiotic, triage to initial intravenous fluid therapy, or ED length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Timeliness of care initiation was no different in high-risk patients with sepsis when using an electronic sepsis alert and protocolized sepsis care.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/therapy , Adolescent , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Alarms , Comorbidity , Female , Fluid Therapy , Humans , Hypotension/epidemiology , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay , Male , Pediatric Emergency Medicine , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sepsis/epidemiology , Time-to-Treatment , Triage , Vital Signs
10.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 36(7): 327-331, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30247459

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to quantify time performing chest compressions (CCs) per year of individual providers in a pediatric ED and to project a rate of opportunity for CC based on median clinical hours per provider category. METHODS: This was an observational study of video-recorded resuscitations in a pediatric ED over 1 year. Events where CCs were performed for more than 2 minutes were included. Identification of providers and duration of CCs per provider were determined by video review. Time of CCs was totaled per provider over the study period. Data were expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR). Rate of opportunity for providing CC to a child was calculated by dividing the median clinical hours per year per provider type by the number of CC events per year. RESULTS: Twenty-three CC events totaling 340 minutes of CCs were analyzed. Chest compressions were performed by 6 (13%) of 45 attending physicians, 3 (25%) of 12 fellows, 32 (22%) of 143 nurses, and 19 (59%) of 32 technicians. The median amount of time performing CC was 182 seconds (IQR, 91-396 seconds); by provider category, median amount of time was as follows: attending physicians, 83 seconds (IQR, 64-103 seconds); fellows, 45 seconds (IQR, 6-83 seconds); nurses, 128 seconds (IQR, 93-271 seconds); and technicians, 534 seconds (IQR, 217-793 seconds). The projected hours needed for an opportunity to perform CCs was 730 hours (91 shifts) for attending physicians, 243 hours (30 shifts) for fellows, and 1460 hours (121 shifts) for nurses and technicians. CONCLUSIONS: Performing CCs on children in the ED is a rare event, with a median of 3 minutes per provider per year. Future studies should determine training methods to optimize readiness for these rare occurrences.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital , Practice Patterns, Nurses'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Child , Female , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Male , Philadelphia , Video Recording
11.
J Emerg Nurs ; 45(6): 614-621, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31537310

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric emergency nurses who are directly involved in clinical care are in key positions to identify the needs and concerns of patients and their families. The 2010 Institute of Medicine report on the future of nursing supports the active participation of nurses in the design and implementation of solutions to improve health outcomes. Although prior efforts have assessed the need for research education within the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN), no systematic efforts have assessed nursing priorities for research in the pediatric ED setting. METHODS: The Delphi technique was used to reach consensus among emergency nurses in the PECARN network regarding research priorities for pediatric emergency care. The Delphi technique uses an iterative process by offering multiple rounds of data collection. Participants had the opportunity to provide feedback during each round of data collection with the goal of reaching consensus about clinical and workforce priorities. RESULTS: A total of 131 nurses participated in all 3 rounds of the survey. The participants represented the majority of the PECARN sites and all 4 regions of the United States. Through consensus 10 clinical and 8 workforce priorities were identified. DISCUSSION: The PECARN network provided an infrastructure to gain expert consensus from nurses on the most current priories that researchers should focus their efforts and resources. The results of the study will help inform further nursing research studies (for PECARN and otherwise) that address patient care and nursing practice issues for pediatric ED patients.


Subject(s)
Delphi Technique , Emergency Nursing/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital , Nursing Research/methods , Pediatric Nursing/methods , Child , Female , Humans , Male , United States
12.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 34(6): 376-380, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28221281

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the success rates, longevity, and complications of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous lines (USgPIVs) placed in a pediatric emergency department. METHODS: The study analyzed 300 USgPIV attempts in an urban tertiary-care pediatric emergency department. Data regarding USgPIV placement were collected from a 1-page form completed by the clinician placing the USgPIV. The time and reason for USgPIV removal were extracted from the medical record for patients with USgPIVs admitted to the hospital. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: This study demonstrated a success rate of 68% and 87% for the first and second attempts with USgPIV. Fifty-five percent of patients had 1 or more prior traditional intravenous access attempt. Most USgPIVs placed on patients admitted to the hospital were removed because they were no longer needed (101/160). We calculated a Kaplan-Meier median survival of 143 hours (6 days; interquartile range, 68-246 hours). The failure rate at 48 hours was 25%. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided intravenous access is a feasible alternative to traditional peripheral intravenous access in the pediatric emergency setting. We observed a high first-stick success rate even in patients who had failed traditional peripheral intravenous access attempts, few complications, and a long intravenous survival time.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Adolescent , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Longevity , Male , Ultrasonography, Interventional/adverse effects
13.
Resuscitation ; 122: 36-40, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29158035

ABSTRACT

AIM: To use video review to compare CC quality between 2-thumb encircling (2T) and one-hand anterior (1H) hand position in infants receiving CPR. METHODS: Events where an infant received >2min of CC using a CPR monitor device while videorecorded were included. CC were measured in segments provided by a single compressor; segment duration, identity of the compressor, and hand position (2T vs 1H) was determined from video review. CC rate and depth were measured by the monitor device. RESULTS: Seven infants received 111min of CCs from a total of 28 providers. 12/28 providers were assessed using both 2T and 1H; 6 providers used 2T and 1H in the same patient. 80 CC segments were analyzed; the median duration of CC segments was 74s (IQR 50-95s). Median CC rate across all segments was 127/min (IQR 115-142/min); median CC depth was 3.0cm (IQR 2.4-3.4cm). 2T position was used in 33/80 (41%) of segments. There was no significant difference in CC depth between 2T and 1H position (3.0±0.8 vs 3.0±0.6cm, p=0.81). 1H position was significantly associated with faster CC rate than 2T position (134±18 vs. 118±15 CC/min, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During CC in infants, 1H position was associated with a greater prevalence of inappropriately fast CC rate compared to 2T. There was no significant difference in depth between 2T and 1H. Future studies should evaluate the effect of hand position on clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/education , Hand , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Time Factors , Video Recording
14.
Ann Emerg Med ; 70(6): 759-768.e2, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28583403

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Recognition of pediatric sepsis is a key clinical challenge. We evaluate the performance of a sepsis recognition process including an electronic sepsis alert and bedside assessment in a pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was a cohort study with quality improvement intervention in a pediatric ED. Exposure was a positive electronic sepsis alert, defined as elevated pulse rate or hypotension, concern for infection, and at least one of the following: abnormal capillary refill, abnormal mental status, or high-risk condition. A positive electronic sepsis alert prompted team assessment or huddle to determine need for sepsis protocol. Clinicians could initiate team assessment or huddle according to clinical concern without positive electronic sepsis alert. Severe sepsis outcome defined as activation of the sepsis protocol in the ED or development of severe sepsis requiring ICU admission within 24 hours. RESULTS: There were 182,509 ED visits during the study period, with 86,037 before electronic sepsis alert implementation and 96,472 afterward, and 1,112 (1.2%) positive electronic sepsis alerts. Overall, 326 patients (0.3%) were treated for severe sepsis within 24 hours. Test characteristics of the electronic sepsis alert alone to detect severe sepsis were sensitivity 86.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82.0% to 89.5%), specificity 99.1% (95% CI 99.0% to 99.2%), positive predictive value 25.4% (95% CI 22.8% to 28.0%), and negative predictive value 100% (95% CI 99.9% to 100%). Inclusion of the clinician screen identified 43 additional electronic sepsis alert-negative children, with severe sepsis sensitivity 99.4% (95% CI 97.8% to 99.8%) and specificity 99.1% (95% CI 99.1% to 99.2%). Electronic sepsis alert implementation increased ED sepsis detection from 83% to 96%. CONCLUSION: Electronic sepsis alert for severe sepsis demonstrated good sensitivity and high specificity. Addition of clinician identification of electronic sepsis alert-negative patients further improved sensitivity. Implementation of the electronic sepsis alert was associated with improved recognition of severe sepsis.


Subject(s)
Clinical Alarms , Emergency Service, Hospital , Sepsis/diagnosis , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Alarms/standards , Clinical Protocols , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Quality Improvement , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vital Signs
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...