ABSTRACT
Given the trend of condensed preclinical curricula in medical schools nationwide, creating meaningful pathology learning experiences within the clinical and post-clinical curricula is important to both enhance student understanding of how pathology integrates into daily healthcare delivery and spark potential career interest in the field. While pathology electives are a common modality for medical students to explore pathology, they frequently render students passive observers of daily clinical workflows (often in grossing and sign-out rooms of surgical pathology). This can have a negative impact on student engagement with their pathology clinical teams and on their satisfaction with the pathology elective experience. As such, we aim to describe our institutional experience in creating a new pathology elective structure, the "Pathology Passport," which leverages intentional student engagement with existing pathology workflows and introduces a means of criterion-based grading. Data collected from student pre- and post-elective surveys demonstrate the elective's positive impact on students' perceived understanding of pathology and their overall learning experience. We hope that our resources can be leveraged at other institutions and even other non-pathology clerkship/elective rotations to promote active engagement of students in clinical workflows while providing clear expectations for grading.
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT.: The Nottingham Grading System (NGS) developed by Elston and Ellis is used to grade invasive breast cancer (IBC). Glandular (acinar)/tubule formation is a component of NGS. OBJECTIVE.: To investigate the ability of pathologists to identify individual structures that should be classified as glandular (acinar)/tubule formation. DESIGN.: A total of 58 hematoxylin-eosin photographic images of IBC with 1 structure circled were classified as tubules (41 cases) or nontubules (17 cases) by Professor Ellis. Images were sent as a PowerPoint (Microsoft) file to breast pathologists, who were provided with the World Health Organization definition of a tubule and asked to determine if a circled structure represented a tubule. RESULTS.: Among 35 pathologists, the κ statistic for assessing agreement in evaluating the 58 images was 0.324 (95% CI, 0.314-0.335). The median concordance rate between a participating pathologist and Professor Ellis was 94.1% for evaluating 17 nontubule cases and 53.7% for 41 tubule cases. A total of 41% of the tubule cases were classified correctly by less than 50% of pathologists. Structures classified as tubules by Professor Ellis but often not recognized as tubules by pathologists included glands with complex architecture, mucinous carcinoma, and the "inverted tubule" pattern of micropapillary carcinoma. A total of 80% of participants reported that they did not have clarity on what represented a tubule. CONCLUSIONS.: We identified structures that should be included as tubules but that were not readily identified by pathologists. Greater concordance for identification of tubules might be obtained by providing more detailed images and descriptions of the types of structures included as tubules.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) might predict pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer treated with trastuzumab (H). Docetaxel (T), carboplatin (C), H, and pertuzumab (P) have immune-modulating effects. Pre- and post-treatment immune biomarkers in cancers treated with neoadjuvant TCH with or without P are lacking. In this study we quantified baseline and changes in TILs, cluster of differentiation (CD) 4+, CD8+, FoxP3+, and PD-L1+ cells using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantified productive T-cell receptor ß (TCRß) rearrangements and TCRß clonality using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 30 HER2+ breast cancer tissues treated with neoadjuvant H with or without P regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty pre- and post-neoadjuvant TCH (n = 4) or TCHP (n = 26) breast cancer tissues were identified. TILs were quantified manually using hematoxylin and eosin. CD4, CD8, FoxP3, and PD-L1 were stained using IHC. TCRß was evaluated using NGS. Immune infiltrates were compared between pCR and non-pCR groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: A pCR occurred in 15 (n = 15; 50%) cancers (TCH n = 2; TCHP, n = 13). Pretreatment TILs, CD4+, CD8+, FoxP3+, and PD-L1+ cells were not associated with response (P = .42, P = .55, P = .19, P = .66, P = .87, respectively. Pretreatment productive TCRß and TCRß clonality did not predict response, P = .84 and P = .40, respectively). However, post-treatment CD4+ and FoxP3+ cells (T-regulatory cells) were elevated in the non-pCR cohort (P = .042 and P = .082, respectively). CONCLUSION: An increase in regulatory T cells in non-pCR tissues suggests the development of an immunosuppressive phenotype. Further investigation in a larger cohort of samples is warranted to validate these findings.
