ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most important and costly complications of surgical operations. Vitamin D antimicrobial and wound healing effects have been recently shown in animal models and in laboratory settings. Furthermore, potential effects of vitamin D in mitigating nosocomial infections and SSIs have been examined at a limited scale. To our knowledge, no comprehensive study has been performed to show the relationship between preoperative level of vitamin D and incidence of SSI. The present study was designed and implemented to investigate this relationship. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study involving 300 adult patients who were admitted to undergo surgery in our tertiary care unit from January 2016 to January 2018. Cutoff point was considered at a level of 30 (ng/mL) in defining vitamin D deficiency. The presence of any SSI was investigated and recorded at the time of discharge and at postoperative visits up to 30 d after the surgery. Cross-tabulation and bivariate and multivariate logistic regression with unadjusted and adjusted odd ratio were used to determine the association between dependent and independent variables and to identify factors associated with SSIs. RESULTS: Overall, of 300 patients who were investigated, 39% had preoperative vitamin D deficiency and 11% developed SSI. In univariate logistic regressions, 20 predictors were selected to be included in the multivariate analysis. Finally preoperative level of 25-hydroxy vitamin D, history of recent infection, preoperative and postoperative hospital length of stay, and postoperative blood transfusions were confirmed as statistically significant independent predictors of SSI. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative 25-hydroxy vitamin D level has a strong effect on postoperative SSI. Prospective double-blinded randomized clinical trials are required to confirm such strong relationship and to settle preoperative vitamin D measurement as a standard approach to reduce postoperative complications including SSI. Preoperative patient optimization, limiting hospital length of stay, and blood transfusion are other strategies to reduce SSI.
Subject(s)
Surgical Wound Infection/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/complications , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Vitamin D/bloodABSTRACT
Background. Regional lymph node recurrence (RLNR) is common in patients with thyroid cancer but clinicopathological predictors are unclear. We aimed to clarify these predictors and identify patients who would benefit from prophylactic lymph node dissection the most. Method. 343 patients with different types of thyroid cancer were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent total thyroidectomy between 2007 and 2013. Results. The median ± interquartile range of patients' age was 40 ± 25 years. 245 (71.4%) patients were female. Regarding the risk of regional lymph node recurrence, we found that male gender, age ≥45 years, non-PTC (i.e., medullary, follicular, and anaplastic types) histopathology, T3 (i.e., tumor size >4 cm in the greatest dimension limited to the thyroid or any tumor with minimal extrathyroid extension), stage IVa, and isolated cervical lymphadenopathy as initial manifestation (ICL) are significant risk factors. T3 (p < 0.001; odds ratio = 156.41, 95% CI [55.72-439.1]) and ICL (p < 0.001; odds ratio = 77.79, 95% CI [31.55-191.81]) were the strongest predictors of regional lymph node recurrence. Conclusion. We found easily achievable risk factors for RLNR in thyroid cancers patients. We suggested that patients with specific clinicopathological features like male gender, age ≥45 years, larger tumor size, and extrathyroidal extension be considered as prophylactic lymphadenectomy candidates.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a well-described surgical technique. However, concerns still exist regarding whether the closure of the appendiceal stump should be done with a clip, an endoloop, or other techniques. In this study, the effect of stump closure on duration of surgery and complications by endoclips was compared with endoloop in patients under laparoscopic appendectomy. The study was carried out as a prospective randomized clinical trial between 2013 and 2015 in Shariati Hospital of Tehran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients under laparoscopic appendectomy were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either endoclips or endoloop for stump closure. The results in terms of the operating time, length of hospital stay, and the complications were compared and analyzed between two groups. After collecting the essential data by using a checklist and examination of patients, the data were analyzed with SPSS. RESULTS: The mean age was 23.13 ± 5.07 years and 44.7% of the patients were male. Moreover, in this study, it was seen that the mean duration of surgery was 23.2 min versus 21.5 min in endoloop and endoclips groups, respectively (P = 0.021). There was no difference between hospital stay among two groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the complications were same in two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The effect of stump closure with endoloop versus endoclips is not different for complications, but the duration of surgery was shorter in endoclips method. Both methods could be used based on the opinion of the surgeon without expecting a statistically significant difference in the results.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Surgical technique using small-diameter instruments and single-incision laparoscopy are two new options for less invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In this study, we have compared mini-LC (MLC) with single-incision LC (SILC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a randomized clinical trial conducted on the patients diagnosed with symptomatic cholelithiasis who underwent LC. Forty patients were randomized to two equal groups of MLC and SILC. They were compared in terms of demographic data, operation time, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in two groups. Operation time in MLC was significantly shorter than that in SILC (45.1 ± 69 min vs 63.75 ± 7.57 min, P-value < 0.001). Also, the total length of the wound in SILC group was shorter than that in MLC group (P-value < 0.003). Postoperative pain scores were similar in two groups. Hospital stay was shorter in MLC (1.2 ± 0.6 days vs 1.6 ± 0.8 days, P < 0.021). There was no difference in postoperative complications in two groups. CONCLUSION: MLC because of less operation time is preferred than SILC. Also, by subjective measures, it was a more comfortable method compared to SILC.
