ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The present study was designed to assess the validity and efficacy of urinary markers (NAG, RBP, transferrin, α1-microglobulin, and plasma homocysteine) as early predictors of microalbuminuria in diabetic nephropathy in children and adolescents with type-1 diabetes, and its relation with haemoglobin glycated (HbA1c), serum lipid profile, and blood pressure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study is a follow-up study to the 2002 study by Salem et al. The present study included 35 type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) children and adolescents recruited from regular attendees of the specialised Diabetology Clinic, Children's hospital, Ain Shams University, with previously measured urinary N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase (13) or homocysteine (11) or transferrin (28) or α1-microglobulin (27) or retinol binding protein (13) as an early predictor of diabetic nephropathy in T1DM. Thirty-five patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus were enrolled, and 24 patients were normoalbuminuric at baseline. The patients were tested for markers other than urinary microalbumin, to predict diabetic nephropathy and early renal impairment in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: Regarding the metabolic control between the studied groups, we found that there is significant difference in HbA1c between the microalbuminuric patients and the normoalbuminuric patients. According to the number of positive markers of diabetic nephropathy, the only parameter that was higher in patients with more than one elevated marker was mean systolic blood pressure. Although mean diabetic blood pressure was higher, it was not statistically significant. Regarding to the predictability of urinary markers, urinary N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase is the most predictable marker with high sensitivity and specificity. The least sensitivity noticed was urinary RBP and the least specificity noticed was urinary α1-microglobulin. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding the predictability of urinary markers, urinary NAG is the most predictable marker with both high sensitivity and specificity, with a sensitivity of 60%, specificity 75%, positive predictive value 60%, negative predictive value 75%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 0.58%. Urinary RBP is another marker with low sensitivity but high specificity. Urinary α1-microglobulin is a valid marker with high sensitivity but low specificity. Contrary to previous markers, plasma homocysteine has high specificity but low sensitivity.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate serum anti-C1q antibodies as a biomarker of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flare and as a proposed noninvasive alternative to renal biopsy which is still the "gold standard" to determine renal activity in SLE. METHODS: Serum anti-C1q antibodies were measured in our patients (all were females), they were followed at the nephrology and pediatric nephrology units at the Faculties of Medicine of Cairo University and Misr University for science and technology (MUST). Our study included 120 patients in the pediatric and adolescent age group and they were categorized into three groups with (mean ± SD of 16.7 ± 3, 16.1 ± 2, 15.9 ± 3) respectively: Group 1 including 40 patients with SLE and active lupus nephritis; Group 2 including 40 patients with SLE and without active lupus nephritis, but with some extra renal activity mainly arthritis; and Group 3 including 40 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Anti-C1q antibodies were found to be significantly higher in patients with active lupus nephritis than those without active nephritis than control individuals with a median (range) of [27.5 (14 - 83), 9 (2.5 - 30), 7 (2 - 13)] respectively. In those with active lupus nephritis, anti-C1q was found to correlate significantly with other parameters assessing lupus nephritis activity like C3 (r = -0.33, p < 0.04), C4 (r = -0.32, p < 0.044), daily urinary protein excretion (r = 0.32, p < 0.036), renal SLEDAI (r = 0.64, p < 0.001), and activity index (r = 0.71, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-C1q antibodies can be used as a considerable marker for LN activity in that age group with 97.5% sensitivity and 65% specificity with the cutoff level 12 U/l. These levels are clearly higher than those for traditional markers of disease activity such as C3/C4 consumption and anti-dsDNA.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of hypoxia on the physiologic inhibition system of coagulation including protein S, protein C, and antithrombin III and to study their effect on thromboembolic accidents of hypoxic newborns. DESIGN: Clinical study including ten hypoxic-ischemic neonates and ten normal neonates as a control group. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, pediatric textbooks, neonatal intensive care unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University. RESULTS: The results of this study revealed a marked decrease in the level of the physiologic inhibition system of coagulation including antithrombin III, protein C, and protein S in 100% of the hypoxic-ischemic neonates compared with the control group (p <.001) before the occurrence of thromboembolic complications. Fifty percent of the hypoxic-ischemic neonates developed disseminated intravascular coagulation and died, 40% developed necrotizing enterocolitis and rectal bleeding, 20% developed hematuria, 30% developed hematemesis, 20% developed intracranial hemorrhage, and 100% had convulsions. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we evaluated the effect of asphyxia on the physiologic inhibition system of coagulation in neonates. Care providers should suspect hypoxia resulting from any obstructed labor and perform the necessary laboratory investigations for coagulation, including antithrombin III, protein C, and protein S levels, to help prevent thromboembolic accidents in asphyxiated neonates, including disseminated intravascular coagulation, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intracranial hemorrhage. Based on the development of antithrombin III and protein C concentrates, which are commercially available, require minimal monitoring, and have very few side effects, the time is ripe for evaluation of optimal treatment for thromboembolic accidents after neonatal asphyxia. This could be even more important if successful neuroprotectant strategies are also developed.
