Outcomes of Patients with Thrombocytopenia Evaluated at Hematology Subspecialty Clinics.

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is a frequently encountered laboratory abnormality and a common reason for hematology referrals. Workup for thrombocytopenia is not standardized and frequently does not follow an evidence-based algorithm. We conducted a systematic analysis to evaluate the laboratory testing and outcomes of patients evaluated for thrombocytopenia at hematology clinics in a tertiary referral center between 2013 and 2016. PATIENT AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive chart review for patients evaluated for thrombocytopenia during the study period. Patients were followed for 1 year from the initial hematology evaluation and assessed for the development of a hematologic malignancy, rheumatologic, or infectious diseases among other clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We evaluated 472 patients with a median (range) age of 61 (17-94) years. The majority (63.8%) had mild thrombocytopenia. Within 1 year of follow-up, 14 patients (3.0%) were diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy. A higher likelihood of developing a hematologic malignancy was noted in patients with concurrent leukopenia (hazard ratio [HR] 9.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.28-30.32, p < .01) and increasing age (HR per 10-year deciles 1.52, 95% CI 1.03-2.25, p = .03). In patients with asymptomatic isolated mild thrombocytopenia, laboratory testing did not reveal any significant positive findings and patients did not receive any new major diagnosis during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide basis and call for development of an evidence-based algorithmic approach for evaluation of patients with thrombocytopenia, testing, and referrals. It also supports a conservative approach mainly driven by physical exam signs, symptoms, and other laboratory findings for patients with isolated mild thrombocytopenia.

Comparative study of therapy-related and de novo adult b-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

We report a comparative analysis of patients with therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (tr-ALL) vs de novo ALL. We identified 331 patients with B-ALL; 69 (21%) were classified as tr-ALL. The most common prior malignancies were breast (23·2%) and plasma cell disorders (20·3%). Patients with tr-ALL were older (median 63·2 vs. 46·2 years, P < 0.001), more often female (66·7% vs. 43·5%, P < 0·001), and more likely to have hypodiploid cytogenetics (18·8% vs. 5·0%, P < 0·001). In multivariable analysis, patients with tr-ALL were less likely to achieve complete remission [odds ratio (OR) = 0·16, P < 0·001] and more likely to be minimal residual disease-positive (OR = 4·86, P = 0·01) but had similar OS after diagnosis and allo-haematopoietic cell transplantation.

Primary peritoneal myeloid sarcoma in association with CBFB/MYH11 fusion.

Myeloid sarcoma, also known as chloroma or granulocytic sarcoma is an extramedullary disease process that typically presents in association with acute myeloid leukemia during initial presentation or at relapse. Often associated with cytogenetic mutations, including t(8;21)(q22;q22); RUNX1/RUNX1T1, and less frequently with inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB/MYH11, myeloid sarcoma is most commonly discovered in skin, soft tissue, bone, and connective tissue. In rare circumstances, myeloid sarcoma can present without any evidence of bone marrow or leukemic involvement. These cases of de novo myeloid sarcoma are rare, and are commonly misdiagnosed due to similarities with other entities. We report an unusual case of a primary de novo peritoneal myeloid sarcoma, in association with inv(16)(p13;q22) and clonal heterogeneity at different sites of involvement, that has responded well to AML induction therapy and consolidation treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin and high dose cytarabine. Cytogenetics, immunophenotyping, and chromosomal analysis, were each critical in establishing a proper diagnosis as well as helping to develop appropriate therapeutic strategies for this rare entity.

Impact of Novel Targeted Therapies and Cytogenetic Risk Groups on Outcome After Allogeneic Transplantation for Adult ALL.

Novel high-risk groups have recently been identified in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), including Philadelphia-like, therapy-related, and measurable residual disease after induction therapy. Furthermore, modern targeted therapies have recently been incorporated into ALL management; rituximab for CD20-positive and blinatumomab for measurable residual disease after induction therapy or relapsed or refractory disease. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is recommended as consolidation therapy for high-risk ALL; however, its relative benefit for these high-risk groups and after novel therapies is unclear. We performed an analysis of posttransplantation outcomes in a cohort of 261 consecutive patients who underwent allo-HCT for ALL at the 3-site Mayo Clinic Cancer Center (January 1, 2008-December 31, 2018). With a median (range) follow-up of 22.4 months (0.5-135.0), the 100-day and 5-year cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality rates were 6.5% and 26.7%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidences of relapse and death were 22.6% and 46.2%, respectively. The 1-year estimate of the composite endpoint of graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival was 39.3%. We observed no associations of novel high-risk groups or modern targeted therapies with overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, or relapse in multivariable analysis. An increased risk of relapse was observed with T-ALL (hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-4.09; P = .02) and hypodiploidy/near-triploidy (hazard ratio, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-7.62; P = .04). Our analysis suggests that novel high-risk groups derive a similar benefit from allo-HCT as traditional high-risk adult ALL and that novel targeted therapies do not seem to independently predict for posttransplantation outcomes. It also calls for further exploration of maintenance strategies after Allo-HCT to prevent relapse in high-risk subgroups.

Donor cell-derived chronic myelomonocytic leukemia presenting after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Donor cell leukemia is a very rare cause of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Herein, we describe an unprecedented case of donor cell-derived chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) presenting seven years after a 51-year-old man received a matched-related alloHCT from his 59-year-old brother for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.