Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 121(2): 445-452, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30032884

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and midazolam for sedative premedication administered by nebuliser 30 min before general anaesthesia in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy and aspiration. METHODS: Ninety children aged 3-7 yr were randomly allocated into three equal groups to be premedicated with either nebulised ketamine 2 mg kg-1 (Group K), dexmedetomidine 2 µg kg-1 (Group D), or midazolam 0.2 mg kg-1 (Group M). The primary endpoint was a five-point sedation score on arrival in the operating room 30 min after end of study drug administration. Secondary outcomes included: parental separation anxiety scale; medication and mask acceptance scales; haemodynamic variables; recovery time; postoperative face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability scale; emergence agitation scale; and adverse effects. RESULTS: The median (range) sedation score on arrival in the operating room was 3.5 (1-4), 2.0 (2-3) and 2.0 (1-3) in Groups M, D, and K, respectively (P=0.000). Subjects in Group D showed higher medication (P<0.03) and mask acceptance scores (P<0.015) and more satisfactory parental separation anxiety scale (P<0.044). The median (range) recovery time was significantly shorter in Group D [5.5 (4-8) min] compared with Group K [10.0 (5-15) min, P=0.000] and M [8.0 (6-15) min, P=0.000]. The incidence of emergence agitation was lower in Group D (P<0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Preschool children premedicated with nebulised dexmedetomidine had more satisfactory sedation, shorter recovery time, and less postoperative agitation than those who received nebulised ketamine or midazolam. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02935959.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Examination/methods , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Preanesthetic Medication/methods , Administration, Inhalation , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Anxiety, Separation/epidemiology , Anxiety, Separation/psychology , Child , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Psychomotor Agitation/epidemiology
2.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 40(3): 219-26, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25404551

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of peri-operative bleeding and re-intervention with peritonsillar lornoxicam infiltration in paediatric tonsillectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, split-body study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 68 patients (7-15 years), ASA I-II, scheduled for tonsillectomy divided into two groups (n = 34) to receive bilateral peritonsillar saline infiltration (placebo group) or peritonsillar saline infiltration in one tonsil (placebo side) and 8 mg lornoxicam in the other tonsil (intervention side; study group). Drugs were administered after induction of anaesthesia and before start of surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intra-operative and postoperative bleeding score, platelet aggregometry before and 30 min after study drug administration, the verbal rating pain scale, time to first postoperative analgesic request, total analgesic consumption during 1st 24 h postoperative and adverse effects were evaluated. RESULTS: The difference in bleeding score between groups did not reach our definition of statistical significance (P < 0.05). Platelet aggregometry tests did not change significantly with time between groups. Lower postoperative pain scores, longer time to first analgesic request (372.76 ± 82.15 versus 64.89 ± 25.76 min P < 0.001) and lower paracetamol consumption (421.76 ± 125.63 versus 690.29 ± 141.47 mg, P < 0.001) were recorded in study group compared with control group. No patient required hospital re-admission or re-operation because of postoperative tonsillar bed bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of significant complications suggests that pre-incisional peritonsillar lornoxicam followed by intravenous paracetamol rescue analgesia may be safe for tonsillectomy in children. To avoid conflict with intra-operative bleeding, postoperative infiltration of lornoxicam is recommended.


Subject(s)
Intraoperative Care/methods , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Piroxicam/analogs & derivatives , Tonsillectomy/methods , Adolescent , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Child , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections , Male , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Palatine Tonsil , Piroxicam/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...