ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the value of vaginal misoprostol 6 h prior to intrauterine device (IUD) insertion in women with previous Caesarean delivery. METHODS: A double-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted in 120 women who were eligible for IUD insertion. Participants were randomly divided to receive either 600 µg vaginal misoprostol or placebo 6 h before IUD insertion. The primary outcome measure was the pain score during the procedure. Secondary outcome measures were failure of insertion, insertion difficulty score, complications of IUD insertion and side effects related to misoprostol. RESULTS: Pain and insertion difficulty scores were significantly lower in the misoprostol group compared with the placebo group (5.7 ± 1.4 vs. 6.5 ± 0.9 and 4.1 ± 1.1 vs. 5.4 ± 2.2, respectively; p < .001). More women experienced nausea, vomiting (5 vs. 0; p = .06) and cramps (10 vs. 0; p < .001) in the misoprostol group than in the placebo group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of misoprostol before IUD insertion is associated with less painful and easier placement.
Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/administration & dosage , Intrauterine Devices/adverse effects , Misoprostol/administration & dosage , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/epidemiology , Adult , Cesarean Section , Double-Blind Method , Egypt , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Misoprostol/adverse effects , Nausea/epidemiology , Pain Measurement , Placebos , Schools, MedicalABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of a thin catheter for hysterosalpingography (HSG) for reducing the pain experienced during the procedure. METHODS: Infertile women undergoing tubal patency tests were randomised into two groups. In the study group (n=66) a thin catheter originally designed for intrauterine insemination was used to inject the dye. Leakage of the dye was prevented using a vaginal speculum to press on the portiovaginalis of the cervix. The control group (n=23) underwent HSG using the standard metal cannula. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the level of pain immediately after the procedure. The main outcome measures were the level of pain experienced by the patient during the procedure and the efficacy of the new technique. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) VAS was 11.2±3.1 in the study group and 54.7±10.1 in the metal cannula group (p<0.0001). During the dye injection, the VAS was 10.3±5.2 in the study group compared to 64.1±17.3 in the metal cannula group (p<0.0001). The new technique was successful in filling the uterine cavity with the dye and studying the fallopian tubes. CONCLUSIONS: Using a thin catheter for HSG and pressing on the cervix with the vaginal speculum to prevent leakage of the dye is a successful method to study the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes, and it significantly reduces the pain as compared to a metal cannula.
