ABSTRACT
The diagnosis of primary retroperitoneal cavernous hemangiomas is extremely rare in clinical practice. Only a few cases have been reported. Due to the lack of specific radiological features, their diagnosis is uncommon. They are usually found incidentally or after symptoms as a consequence of complications. Adult retroperitoneal cavernous hemangiomas are extremely rare. This is a report of a rare case of a primary retroperitoneal cavernous hemangioma in a 45-year-old male patient discovered after acute appendicitis. A histopathological examination is conducted following total surgical resection to confirm the diagnosis.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The quality assurance (QA) chart rounds are multidisciplinary meetings to review radiation therapy (RT) treatment plans. This study focus on describing the changes in RT management based on QA round reviews in a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 9 full years of implementation, a retrospective review of all patients whose charts passed through departmental QA chart rounds from 2007 to 2015. The reviewed cases were presented for RT plan review; subcategorized based on decision in QA rounds into: approved, minor modifications or major modifications. Major modification defined as any substantial change which required patient re-simulation or re-planning prior to commencement of RT. Minor modification included treatment plan changes which didn't necessarily require RT re-planning. RESULTS: Overall 7,149 RT treatment plans for different anatomical sites were reviewed at QA rounds. From these treatment plans, 6,654 (93%) were approved, 144 (2%) required minor modifications, while 351 (5%) required major modifications. Major modification included changes in: selected RT dose (96/351, 27%), target volume definition (127/351, 36%), organs-at-risk contouring (10/351, 3%), dose volume objectives/constraints criteria (90/351, 26%), and intent of treatment (28/351, 8%). The RT plans which required major modification according to the tumor subtype were as follows: head and neck (104/904, 12%), thoracic (12/199, 6%), gastrointestinal (33/687,5%), skin (5/106, 5%), genitourinary (16/359, 4%), breast (104/2387, 4%), central nervous system (36/846, 4%), sarcoma (11/277, 4%), pediatric (7/251, 3%), lymphoma (10/423, 2%), gynecological tumors (2/359, 1%), and others (11/351, 3%). CONCLUSION: Multi-disciplinary standardized QA chart rounds provide a comprehensive and an influential method on RT plans and/ or treatment decisions.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The quality assurance (QA) chart rounds are multidisciplinary meetings to review radiation therapy (RT) treatment plans. This study focus on describing the changes in RT management based on QA round reviews in a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 9 full years of implementation, a retrospective review of all patients whose charts passed through departmental QA chart rounds from 2007 to 2015. The reviewed cases were presented for RT plan review; subcategorized based on decision in QA rounds into: approved, minor modifications or major modifications. Major modification defined as any substantial change which required patient re-simulation orre-planning prior to commencement of RT. Minor modification included treatment plan changes which didn’t necessarily require RT re-planning. RESULTS: Overall 7,149 RT treatment plans for different anatomical sites were reviewed at QA rounds. From these treatment plans, 6,654 (93%) were approved, 144 (2%) required minor modifications, while 351 (5%) required major modifications. Major modification included changes in: selected RT dose (96/351, 27%), target volume definition (127/351, 36%), organs-at-risk contouring (10/351, 3%), dose volume objectives/constraints criteria (90/351, 26%), and intent of treatment (28/351, 8%). The RT plans which required major modification according to the tumor subtype were as follows: head and neck (104/904, 12%), thoracic (12/199, 6%), gastrointestinal (33/687,5%), skin (5/106, 5%), genitourinary (16/359, 4%), breast (104/2387, 4%), central nervous system (36/846, 4%), sarcoma (11/277, 4%), pediatric (7/251, 3%), lymphoma (10/423, 2%), gynecological tumors (2/359, 1%), and others (11/351, 3%). CONCLUSION: Multi-disciplinary standardized QA chart rounds provide a comprehensive and an influential method on RT plans and/ or treatment decisions.
Subject(s)
Humans , Breast , Central Nervous System , Head , Jordan , Lymphoma , Methods , Neck , Peer Review , Radiotherapy , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma , SkinABSTRACT
Lumpy skin disease (LSD) is a highly infectious disease of cattle caused by a virus of the Capripoxvirus genus in the family Poxviridae. The disease is a major concern for the dairy industry in Saudi Arabia. In this study, an outbreak of LSD in cattle herds was detected in Saudi Arabia in 2016. LSD outbreak was investigated in five regions of Saudi Arabia: Al-Hassa, Al-Sharqia, Al-Qassim, Riyadh and Al-Taif during the period from April to July 2016. Tissues from skin nodules were collected to characterize the virus by a real-time polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR). During this period, 64,109 cattle were examined and morbidity, mortality and case fatality rates were 6%, 0.99% and 16.6%, respectively. The analysis showed 3,852 infected cases and 641 deaths. highest number of infected animals was reported in Al-Hassa (2,825), followed by Al-Qassim (547), Riyadh (471), Al-Sharqia (6) and Al-Taif (3). The highest morbidity rates were observed in Al-Qassim (6.8%), Al-Hassa (6.2%), Riyadh (5.5%) and Al-Taif (0.96%), while the lowest morbidity rates were recorded in Al-Sharqia (0.27%). The highest mortality rates were also observed in Al-Qassim (2.3%), followed by Al-Hassa (0.97%), Riyadh (0.19%) and lowest in Al-Sharqia and Taif (0%). LSD virus was detected in all samples (n = 191) by real-time PCR analysis. The disease has been observed in the cattle regardless of previous vaccination using the locally Romanian-pox vaccine; therefore, vaccination programme and vaccine efficacy should be assessed under field conditions.
Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Lumpy Skin Disease/diagnosis , Lumpy Skin Disease/epidemiology , Lumpy skin disease virus/isolation & purification , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Animals , Cattle , Female , Lumpy Skin Disease/virology , Lumpy skin disease virus/genetics , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Vaccination/veterinaryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness and safety of PEDYPHAR ointment (a new ointment prepared from natural royal jelly and panthenol in an ointment base) in the treatment of patients with limb-threatening diabetic foot infections. METHOD: Sixty patients presenting with limb-threatening diabetic foot infection were categorised into three groups, based on the severity of the lesions. Group I: full-thickness skin ulcer (Wagner grades 1 and 2); group 2: deep tissue infection and suspected osteomyelitis (grade 3); group 3: gangrenous lesions (grades 4 and 5). They were treated with PEDYPHAR ointment after irrigation and cleansing with normal saline, and surgical debridement if required. The lesions were covered with dressings and patients were followed up for six months or until full healing occurred. No other specific treatment was given apart from insulin treatment to control the diabetes. The primary endpoint was the clinical response at weeks 3, 9 and 24 from the start of treatment. RESULTS: Ninety-six per cent of the patients in groups 1 and 2 responded well, with a complete cure, defined as'complete closure of the ulcer without signs of underlying bone infection' by the end of week 9 and for the duration of the six-month follow-up period. All of the ulcers in group 1 healed, as did 92% of those in group 2. All patients in group 3 healed following surgical excision, debridement of necrotic tissue and conservative treatment with PEDYPHAR ointment. CONCLUSION: We can conclude from our pilot study that PEDYPHAR ointment may be a promising, safe conservative local treatment. However, further double-blind randomised controlled studies are needed to confirm this.
Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Fatty Acids/therapeutic use , Pantothenic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Safety , Administration, Cutaneous , Diabetic Foot/classification , Drug Combinations , Egypt , Fatty Acids/pharmacology , Female , Honey , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ointments , Pantothenic Acid/pharmacology , Pantothenic Acid/therapeutic use , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Skin Care/methods , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the activity and the safety of the gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) combination as first-line treatment in advanced/metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelial tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or unresectable TCC, PS < or =2, creatinine < or =1.5 upper limit of normal range (UNL) and measurable disease according to RECIST criteria were treated with a combination of gemcitabine (1500 mg/m(2)) followed by oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: A total of 123 cycles were administered to 30 patients (median 4, range 1-8). Three complete responses (CR) and 11 partial responses (PR) were observed. Overall response rate (ORR) was 47% (95% CI 28% to 66%). Median overall survival (OS) was 15 months (95% CI 8-31). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia were reported in three and one patient, respectively; grade 3 anaemia in three patients; grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in two and one patient, respectively; grade 1, 2 and 3 peripheral neuropathy in 14, 11 and two patients, respectively; grade 2 and 3 fatigue in 13 and seven patients respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The GEMOX combination is active in advanced/metastatic TCC with minimal toxicity and needs to be evaluated in a selected population of unfit patients and compared with other non-cisplatin-containing regimens.