Does sequential examination under anaesthesia provide a reliable method to determine a management plan for unstable lateral compression pelvic ring injuries? a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of sequential examination under anaesthesia (EUA) to determine pelvic instability and to evaluate radiological and functional outcomes in unstable lateral compression (LC) injuries. METHODS: A prospective case series study was conducted from 2020 to 2022 at a university hospital on 43 cases with LC injuries that met the inclusion criteria. Sequential EUA was carried out in three steps. Posterior-only fixation or anterior-posterior fixation was done according to the algorithm. Each patient was followed up for at least 12 months, both radiologically and functionally. RESULTS: Forty cases proved unstable and were fixed. None showed secondary displacement in the anterior-posterior fixation group. However, five cases (19.2%) of the posterior-only fixation group showed secondary displacement with a mean of 5.9 mm. Four cases of them had tetra-ramic injuries. There is a high tendency for secondary displacement at 14.5 mm or more preoperative displacement of the rami. Patients with secondary displacement showed comparable functional outcome scores to patients without secondary displacement. Posterior-only fixation showed shorter operative time, lesser radiological exposure, blood loss and iatrogenic nerve injury than anterior-posterior fixation. CONCLUSION: EUA is a reliable method to determine pelvic instability and management plan for LC fractures with unilateral anterior ring injury. Anterior-posterior fixation is needed if there is a tetra-ramic fracture or initial anterior ring displacement of 14.5 mm or more, irrespective of EUA.

The use of Verbrugge forceps for reduction of the posterior column element in displaced acetabular fractures: clinical and radiological evaluation.

PURPOSE: Different reduction techniques and tools are described to facilitate anatomical reduction of acetabular fractures. However, maintenance of reduction, plate placement, and fracture fixation remain a challenge owing to the large surface area occupied by the available reduction tools. This study aims at radiological and functional assessment of the effectiveness of a novel reduction technique for the posterior column element in displaced acetabular fractures. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted for evaluation of a novel reduction technique; the use of the conventional large holding Verbrugge forceps for reduction of posterior column and transverse, with or without posterior wall, fractures. Intra-operative safety and reduction time were evaluated. The immediate postoperative quality of reduction was assessed using Matta radiographic criteria. The functional outcome was evaluated at the latest follow-up visit using the modified Merle d'Aubigne and Postel (MDP) score. RESULTS: Thirty patients with a mean follow-up of 18.1 months were included. Fifteen had transverse/posterior wall, ten had transverse, and five had posterior column fractures. All fractures were displaced ≥ 2 mm on anteroposterior and/or Judet views of the pelvis without traction. The average operative time was 100.4 min with 12.5 min reduction time. No intra-operative complications were encountered. Twenty-three patients (76.6%) had anatomical while seven (23.3%) had imperfect reduction. The functional outcome score was excellent in three patients, good in 18, fair in four, and poor in five patients at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSION: The use of the conventional large Verbrugge bone-holding forceps for the reduction of the posterior column element in displaced acetabular fractures using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach is a safe, effective, time-saving, and technically undemanding procedure.

Symphyseal plate with trans-symphyseal cross-screws for fixation of tile-type B1 pelvic ring injuries: radiological and functional evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Failure to neutralize the different physiological forces acting on the inferior as well as the superior regions of the pubic symphysis, the long healing time, is blamed for the repeated failures of conventional superior symphyseal plating. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A three years prospective case series study between January 2017 and December 2019 was done, to evaluate the radiological and the functional outcomes, using Matta/Tornetta and Majeed criteria respectively, of the combination of trans-symphyseal cross-screws configuration and superior symphyseal plate in Tile-type B1 pelvic injuries. RESULTS: Thirty patients, 18 with anteroposterior compression type II and 12 with type III, with a mean follow-up of 20 months ±5 were included. Radiologically, 26 (86.6%) cases showed an excellent, one (3.3%) good and three (10%) fair outcome. Clinically, excellent outcome in 26 (86.6%) cases, good in two (6.6%) cases, and fair in two (6.6%). Intra-operative drill bit breakage occurred in three (10%) cases and was the only reported technical complication. Significant re-displacement was reported in three (10%) cases. CONCLUSION: The open trans-symphyseal cross-screws for fixation of the superior symphyseal plate is a simple, efficient, and safe technique with the biomechanical advantages of an extra-fixation point to the inferior symphysis together with a long and a strong bony anchorage.

Treatment of non-united femoral neck fracture by a novel subtrochanteric angulation lateral translation valgus osteotomy (SALVA osteotomy).

PURPOSE: The ideal treatment of non-united and neglected fracture neck femur in the young adult still remains unclear and is characterized by many biological and biomechanical challenges. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with non-united or neglected fracture neck femur aged between 19 and 50 years were treated by a novel subtrochanteric valgus osteotomy and were followed up for a mean of 26.7 months. Patients were assessed by radiological parameters, the Harris Hip Score, Oxford Knee Score, and Askin Bryan Criteria to categorize the overall outcome of the patients at 24 months. Other outcome measures included the occurrence of AVN, adductor lever arm, leg length discrepancy, and mechanical implant failure. RESULTS: All patients treated with the SALVA osteotomy consolidated and displayed a marked improvement of functional and radiological outcome measures. Nevertheless, there were 2 mechanical failures in patients with marked osteopenia and three developed AVN. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with un-united/neglected fracture neck femur, SALVA osteotomy appears to be reliable and reproducible. It also restores the abductor lever arm and improves the leg length discrepancy. Technically less demanding conversion to arthroplasty remains still possible prospectively.

Role of arthroscopy for the diagnosis and management of post-traumatic hip pain: a prospective study.

The current published literature regarding the role of hip arthroscopy in the diagnosis and management of post-traumatic hip pain is still limited. Therefore, we conducted the present prospective study to determine the value of hip arthroscopy in the diagnosis and management of various causes of hip pain after traumatic conditions. The present study included a prospective cohort of 17 patients with symptomatic post-traumatic hip pain. It was conducted between July 2013 and May 2018. The mean age was 22 (19-29) years and the mean follow-up was 24 (r: 7-36) months. Prior to surgery, every eligible patient underwent assessment of functional status using the Modified Harris Hip Score, Oxford hip score (OHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score. All patients underwent arthroscopic management for their diagnosed pathologies. The most commonly encountered diagnosis was labral tear (58.8%), followed by ligamentum teres tear (35.3%) and loose intra-articular fragments (29.4%). In addition, 52.9% of the patients had associated CAM lesion and 11.8% had associated Pincer lesion. The mHSS, OHS and WOMAC score showed significant improvement in the post-operative period (P < 0.001), all the 17 patients had 100% Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State; only one patient did not achieve minimal clinical importance difference. One case underwent labral debridement for failed labral repair (5.8%), another patient developed maralgia paraesthetica (5.8%). In conclusion, hip arthroscopy is a useful and effective minimally invasive procedure for the diagnosis and management of selected patients with post-traumatic hip pain. Moreover, hip arthroscopy was safe technique with no reported serious adverse events.

Single versus double column fixation in transverse fractures of the acetabulum: A randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Biomechanical studies have compared fixation methods in transverse acetabular fractures, yet there is not enough clinical data to suggest an optimal fixation method. The aim of this randomized controlled trail was to compare fracture stability in posterior plating alone versus posterior plating and anterior column lag-screw fixation in treatment of transverse and transverse with posterior wall acetabular fractures. METHODS: Thirty patients were randomized to one of two groups, either posterior fixation alone (single column group), or posterior plating and anterior fixation with percutaneous anterior column screw (double column group). Patients were followed up with serial radiographic assessments documenting any loss of reduction, utilizing Matta's radiological criteria, measuring the roof arc angles and by measuring any change in the femoral head offset. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were randomized to each group. Mean patient age was 31 years, mean follow up period was 19 months (range 12-24). There was no significant differences between the two groups with regards the quality of post-operative reduction, blood loss, hospital stay and functional score using the modified Merle D'Aubinge and Postel score. The operative time was significantly longer in the double column fixation group (130 min versus 104 min). There was no loss of reduction observed in either of the two groups. CONCLUSION: Single poster column fixation in transverse and transverse posterior wall fractures showed similar result to double column fixation, in terms of fractures stability in the follow up period, quality of reduction and early functional outcome.

Quadrilateral plate fractures of the acetabulum: Proposition for a novel classification system.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no definition or classification system for quadrilateral plate (QLP) fractures; the aim was to anatomically and radiologically characterise the QLP, propose a definition and classify QLP fractures. METHODS: This study included an anatomical component and a radiological component. The anatomical study aimed at defining the characteristics of the QLP; the QLP was identified using four articulating bony pelvis specimens. A titanium mesh was placed on the specimens' quadrilateral surface; standard anteroposterior and oblique views were obtained, and axial CT images, to determine the radiological landmarks. The radiological study included the review of images of patients with QLP fractures; fractures involving the QLP were identified in a series of 609 consecutive patients with acetabular fractures. RESULTS: We considered QLP fractures where the QLP is separated from both columns of the acetabulum; this was found in 16% (98 cases). They were mostly encountered with associated both columns fractures (60 cases; 61%), Separation of the QLP could be complete or incomplete, or simple or comminuted, so QLP fractures were divided into three types: QLP1, simple with incomplete separation; QLP2, comminuted with incomplete separation; QLP3, comminuted with complete separation (QLP4), simple with complete separation. CONCLUSION: The QLP was characterised, and a definition and classification system; Cairo University Hospitals (CUH) Classification was proposed for these fractures. We believe that this classification may prove useful in the future for the identification and management of these fractures.

Fixation of quadrilateral plate fractures of the acetabulum using the buttress screw: A novel technique.

INTRODUCTION: Quadrilateral plate fractures constitute one of the most challenging components of acetabular fractures. The objective of this study is to describe and evaluate the novel technique of buttress screw fixation of the quadrilateral plate component of the acetabular fractures. PATIENTS & METHODS: Forty cases of acetabular fracture with associated quadrilateral plate component were included in the study. Mean age was 35 years (range, 16-68years), with a mean follow-up 16.4 months (range, 9-36months). Fixation of the quadrilateral plate was achieved by one or more buttress screws. The screws were inserted through the reconstruction plate, and placed close to the edge of the pelvic brim. To effectively achieve the 3-point fixation principle, the screw was inserted through the plate hole then outside the bone rubbing on the pelvic surface of the quadrilateral plate. RESULTS: Anatomical reduction of the quadrilateral plate component of the fractures was achieved in all but one patient. The modified Merle D'Aubigné and Postel score was excellent in 13 cases, good in 23 cases, fair in three cases, and poor in one case. No screw displacement or failures were observed during follow-up evaluation. No major complications related to this technique were observed in this series. CONCLUSION: Buttress screw fixation of the quadrilateral plate fracture component in associated acetabular fractures is a safe and effective technique for reduction and fixation of these challenging fractures with no major complications related to this novel technique.