MRI Posttreatment Surveillance for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Proposed MR NI-RADS Criteria.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The current Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) criteria were designed for contrast-enhanced CT with or without PET. Prior studies have revealed the capability of DWI and T2 signal intensity in distinguishing locoregional tumor residual and recurrence from posttreatment benign findings in head and neck cancers. We aimed to propose MR imaging NI-RADS criteria by adding diffusion criteria and T2 signal intensity to the American College of Radiology NI-RADS template. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 69 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who underwent posttreatment contrast-enhanced MRI imaging surveillance using a 1.5T scanner. The scans were interpreted by 2 neuroradiologists. Image analysis assessed the primary tumor site using the current American College of Radiology NI-RADS morphologic lexicon (mainly designed for contrast-enhanced CT with or without PET). NI-RADS rescoring was then performed based on our proposed criteria using T2 signal and diffusion features. The reference standard was a defined set of criteria, including clinical and imaging follow-up and pathologic assessment. RESULTS: Imaging assessment of treated HNSCC at the primary tumor site using T2 signal intensity and diffusion features as modifying rules to NI-RADS showed higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy (92.3%, 90.7%, 85.7%, 95.1%, and 91.3%, respectively) compared with the current NI-RADS lexicon alone (84.6%, 81.4%, 73.3%, 89.8%, and 82.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of diffusion features and T2 signal to the American College of Radiology NI-RADS criteria for the primary tumor site enhances the specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and NI-RADS accuracy.

Cone-beam CT versus Multidetector CT in Postoperative Cochlear Implant Imaging: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cone-beam CT is being increasingly used in head and neck imaging. We compared cone-beam CT with multidetector CT to assess postoperative implant placement and delineate finer anatomic structures, image quality, and radiation dose used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 51 patients with cochlear implants and postoperative imaging via temporal bone cone-beam CT (n = 32 ears) or multidetector CT (n = 19 ears) between 2012 and 2017. We evaluated the visualization quality of single electrode contacts, the scalar position of the electrodes, cochlear walls, mastoid facial canal, metallic artifacts (using a 4-level visual score), and the ability to measure the insertion angle of the electrodes. The signal-to-noise ratio and radiation dose were also evaluated. RESULTS: Cone-beam CT was more sensitive for visualizing the scalar position of the electrodes (P = .046), cochlear outer wall (P = .001), single electrode contacts (P < .001), and osseous spiral lamina (P = .004) and had fewer metallic artifacts (P < .001). However, there were no significant differences between both methods in visualization of the modiolus (P = .37), cochlear inner wall (P > .99), and mastoid facial canal wall (P = .07) and the ability to measure the insertion angle of the electrodes (P > .99). The conebeam CT group had significantly lower dose-length product (P < .001), but multidetector CT showed a higher signal-to-noise ratio in both bone and air (P = .22 and P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Cone-beam CT in patients with cochlear implants provides images with higher spatial resolution and fewer metallic artifacts than multidetector CT at a relatively lower radiation dose.