Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 42(7): 857-62, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23497981

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intranasal use of 1.5 µg/kg atomized dexmedetomidine for sedation in patients undergoing mandibular third molar removal. Eighteen patients underwent third molar removal in two surgical sessions. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intranasal water (placebo group) or 1.5 µg/kg atomized dexmedetomidine (group D) at the first session. The alternate regimen was used during the second session. Local anaesthesia was injected 30 min after placebo/sedative administration. Pain from local anaesthesia infiltration was rated on a scale from zero (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Sedation status was measured every 10 min by a blinded observer with a modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale and the bispectral index (BIS). Adverse reactions and analgesic consumption were recorded. Sedation values in group D were significantly different from placebo at 20-30 min, peaked at 40-50 min, and returned to placebo levels at 70-80 min after intranasal drug administration. Group D displayed decreased heart rate and systolic blood pressure, but the decreases did not exceed 20% of the baseline values. Intranasal administration of 1.5 µg/kg atomized dexmedetomidine is effective, convenient, and safe as a sedative for patients undergoing third molar extraction.


Subject(s)
Administration, Intranasal/methods , Anesthesia, Dental/methods , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Molar, Third/surgery , Tooth Extraction , Adult , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Male , Mandible/surgery , Pain Measurement , Tooth, Impacted/surgery
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 42(8): 988-93, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23490474

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare fentanyl-based versus remifentanil-based anesthesia with regards to the intraoperative hemodynamic stress response and recovery profiles in patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy. Seventeen patients were randomly divided into two groups: patients in the F-group received 2 µg/kg fentanyl intravenously followed by an infusion of 0.03-0.06 µg/kg/min, while patients in the R-group received a 0.5 µg/kg bolus of remifentanil followed by an infusion of 0.0625-0.250 µg/kg/min. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded at the following points: before anesthetic induction, at endotracheal intubation, 5 min after intubation, at incision, just before the osteotomy, during the osteotomy, during the maxillary fracturing, at suturing, at extubation, 5 min after extubation, and then 15 and 30 min postoperatively. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in the R-group in comparison to the F-group from t1 to t9 (P<0.05). All measured recovery times were significantly shorter in the R-group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative side effects was comparable between groups. Remifentanil-based anesthesia is an appropriate alternative to fentanyl during Le Fort I orthognathic surgery; it promotes hemodynamic stability, blunts the stress response to noxious stimuli, and provides a better recovery profile.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia Recovery Period , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Arterial Pressure/drug effects , Heart Rate/drug effects , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/methods , Osteotomy, Le Fort/methods , Piperidines/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Loss, Surgical , Female , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal , Labetalol/therapeutic use , Male , Maxilla/surgery , Methyl Ethers/administration & dosage , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/etiology , Prospective Studies , Remifentanil , Sevoflurane , Single-Blind Method , Wound Closure Techniques , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...