Readability of Patient Educational Materials in Pediatric Orthopaedics.

BACKGROUND: Parents are increasingly turning to the internet to seek pediatric health information. Numerous organizations advise that patient educational materials (PEMs) should not surpass the sixth-grade reading level. We aimed to assess the readability of online pediatric orthopaedic PEMs. METHODS: The readability of 176 articles pertaining to pediatric orthopaedics from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA), and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) websites was assessed with the use of 8 readability formulae: the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level, the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the Raygor Estimate, the SMOG, the Coleman-Liau, the Fry, the FORCAST, and the Gunning Fog. The mean reading grade level (RGL) of each article was compared with the sixth and eighth-grade reading levels. The mean RGL of each website's articles also was compared. RESULTS: The cumulative mean RGL was 10.2 (range, 6.6 to 16.0). No articles (0%) were written at the sixth-grade reading level, and only 7 articles (4.0%) were written at or below the eighth-grade reading level. The mean RGL was significantly higher than the sixth-grade (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, 4.0 to 4.4; p < 0.001) and eighth-grade (95% CI, 2.0 to 2.4; p < 0.001) reading levels. The mean RGL of articles on the POSNA website was significantly lower than the mean RGL of the articles on the AAOS (95% CI, -1.8 to -1.0; p < 0.001) and AAP (95% CI, -2.9 to -1.1; p < 0.001) websites. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric orthopaedic PEMs that are produced by the AAOS, the POSNA, and the AAP have readability scores that exceed recommendations. Given the increasing preference of parents and adolescents for online health information, the growing body of online PEMs, and the critical role that health literacy plays in patient outcomes, substantial work is required to address the readability of these materials.

Readability of Patient Educational Materials in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Has a Decade Made a Difference?

BACKGROUND: The Internet has become an increasingly popular resource among orthopedic patients for health education. Numerous organisations recommend that patient educational materials (PEMs) should not exceed the 6th grade reading level. Despite this, studies have repeatedly shown the reading grade level (RGL) of PEMs to be too advanced across a range of surgical specialties. We aimed to determine the readability of online hip and knee arthroplasty PEMs. METHODS: The readability of 134 articles pertaining to hip and knee arthroplasty from 5leading worldwide healthcare websites were assessed, using 8 readability formulae; the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level, the Flesch Reading Ease Score, Raygor Estimate, SMOG, Coleman-Liau, Fry, FORCAST and Gunning Fog. The mean RGL was compared to the 6th and 8thgrade reading level. The mean RGL of each website was also compared. RESULTS: The mean cumulative RGL was 12 (range = 7-16.1). No articles (0%) were written at a 6th grade reading level and only 4 articles (3%) were written at or below the 8th grade reading level. The mean RGL was significantly higher than the 6th (95% CI, 5.62-6.30; P < .0001) and 8th grade reading level (95% CI, 3.63-4.30; P < .0001). There was a significant difference between the RGLs of the 5websites (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Arthroplasty PEMs produced by leading worldwide healthcare organisations have readability scores that are above the recommended levels. Given the imperative role of health literacy in patient outcomes and satisfaction, and the increasing prevalence of Internet use among orthopedic patients, a substantial amount of work needs to be done to improve the readability of these materials.