Evaluation of the Pubocervical Fascia With 3-Dimensional Endovaginal Ultrasonography and Correlation With Intraoperative Findings During Robotic Sacrocervicopexy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pubocervical fascia (PF) in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) using 3-dimensonal endovaginal ultrasonography (EVUS) and to correlate the PF appearance with both pelvic examination and intraoperative findings during ultrasonographic robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy and pubocervical fascia reconstruction (u-RALS-PFR). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in 120 women with symptomatic POP. Preoperative evaluation was done using EVUS. We identified areas of PF weakness based on pelvic examination as hypoechoic and hyperechoic defects (HHD) between the bladder and vagina. Study measurements included distance from the HHD to the pubic symphysis, HHD to the bladder neck, HHD to the posterior bladder wall, and hypoechoic-hyperechoic area. We correlated these metrics with the respective POP-Q stages and findings during u-RALS-PFR. RESULTS: Using the quantitative measures during EVUS, we found a significant association between mean HHD (2.7 cm) and POP-Q stage III, and between HHD and number of plications performed during surgery. The larger the HHD, the more severe the POP-Q stage of the anterior compartment of the vaginal wall; thus, more plications were performed on the PF (7-12 plications) during robotic sacrocervicopexy, and consequently the anterior arm of the Y-mesh was significantly trimmed (6-8 cm). CONCLUSION: HHD obtained by EVUS was associated with severe POP-Q stage III and seemed to correlate with the number of plications during robotic sacrocervicopexy. Performing these plications on the PF significantly decreased the length of the anterior vaginal mesh needed for the procedure. These findings may open new applications for preoperative ultrasonography in evaluation and treatment of patients with apical and anterior POP.

Ultrasonography and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy with pubocervical fascia reconstruction: comparison with standard technique.

The objective of this study was to evaluate our technique of ultrasonography and robotic-assisted sacrocervicopexy with pubocervical fascia reconstruction (u-RALS-PFR) versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy (s-RALS) in the treatment of patients with symptomatic apical/anterior vaginal prolapse. A retrospective analysis was done using the data in two community hospitals. Thirty women presented with symptomatic vaginal apical prolapse and desired minimally invasive surgery (video): (a) standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy (s-RALS) (n = 15) or (b) ultrasound and robotic-assisted sacrocervicopexy with pubocervical fascia reconstruction (u-RALS-PFR) (n = 15) were eligible to participate. All participants underwent a standardized evaluation, including a structured urogynecologic history and physical examination with pelvic organ prolapse quantitative staging. There was longer operating room time in the u-RALS-PFR group compared with the s-RALS group (average difference 35 min); however, sacral promontory dissection time was less in the u-RALS-PFR (average difference of 15 min). The anterior/posterior vaginal dissection and mesh tensioning time was longer in the u-RALS-PFR, as expected. There was only one surgical and anatomic failure (7%) in the s-RALS group after 6 months of surgery (POP Q = Aa + 1, Ba0, Ap-2, Bp-3, C-7). Our technique of ultrasonography and pubocervical fascia reconstruction during RALS appears to be feasible and safe. It aims to improve anterior and apical support, minimize the use of mesh and improve visualization during surgery. u-RALS-PFR approach will add some additional time during surgery but may provide better outcomes.