Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet ; 45(3): 351-360, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31997084

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Green tea catechins were recently reported to inhibit drug transporters such as organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs) and metabolic enzymes, affecting the bioavailability of many drugs. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of the effects of different doses of green tea extract on the pharmacokinetic parameters of atorvastatin and to rationalize the associated interaction mechanism. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, three-phase crossover study involving 12 healthy volunteers was performed. Participants received a single dose of atorvastatin 40 mg alone (control group), atorvastatin 40 mg plus a capsule containing 300 mg of dry green tea extract, or atorvastatin 40 mg plus a capsule containing 600 mg of dry green tea extract. Plasma samples taken from the volunteers were analyzed for atorvastatin using liquid chromatography-tandom mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). RESULTS: Compared to atorvastatin alone, the administration of 300 mg or 600 mg of the green tea extract along with atorvastatin decreased the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of atorvastatin by 25% and 24%, respectively (P < 0.05), and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) of atorvastatin by 24% and 22%, respectively (P < 0.05). Additionally, administration of 300 mg or 600 mg of the green tea extract increased the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of atorvastatin by 31% and 29%, respectively. The time to Cmax (Tmax) and the elimination half-life (t1/2) of atorvastatin did not differ among the three phases. The effects of 600 mg of the green tea extract on the pharmacokinetic parameters of atorvastatin were not significantly different from the effects of 300 mg of the green tea extract. CONCLUSION: Green tea extract decreases the absorption but not the elimination of atorvastatin, possibly by inhibiting OATP, albeit not in a dose-dependent manner. Coadministration of green tea extract with atorvastatin may necessitate the monitoring of the plasma concentration of atorvastatin in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Atorvastatin/pharmacokinetics , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Tea/chemistry , Adult , Area Under Curve , Catechin/pharmacology , Chromatography, Liquid , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Herb-Drug Interactions , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organic Anion Transporters/antagonists & inhibitors , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Young Adult
2.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 36(11): 2195-2206, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31650455

ABSTRACT

The impact of the prematurely elevated serum progesterone on the late follicular phase, commonly known as premature luteinization (PL), is a matter of continuing debate. Available evidence supports that serum progesterone ≥ 1.5 ng/ml on the day of ovulation triggering could reduce the pregnancy potential in fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles by jeopardizing endometrial receptivity. Causes of PL during ovarian stimulation are unclear. Recent studies point toward the daily follicle-stimulating hormone dosage, duration of controlled ovarian stimulation, number of oocytes retrieved, and peak estradiol level as factors affecting the incidence of PL. Emerging data show additional influence on embryo quality. The prevention of PL has been challenging. The key elements in preventing PL include individualization of ovarian stimulation according to patient's ovarian reserve, proper ovulation trigger timing, and use of medications such as corticosteroids and metformin. Embryo cryopreservation with deferred embryo transfer is the established strategy to overcome PL, yet it is an extra burden to the IVF laboratory and increased cost for patients. Herein, we review the up-to-date knowledge of this frequent IVF problem including causes, proposed diagnostic criteria, and its impact on endometrial receptivity, embryo quality, and pregnancy outcomes. The preventive measures and rescue strategies are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Luteinization/physiology , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Humans , Ovary/physiology , Ovulation/physiology , Ovulation Induction/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...