Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Infect Public Health ; 14(10): 1466-1473, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34175238

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are a presumed high-risk population for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Identifying factors associated with seroprevalence can help establish better practices in healthcare settings. In this study, we evaluate prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among previously undiagnosed HCWs and describe profiling of antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2, including neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of 386 HCWs in a university hospital in Egypt and 725 volunteers not affiliated to any healthcare facility (non-healthcare workers - NHCWs). Participants provided a nasopharyngeal swab and serum samples for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid and SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, respectively. HCWs who tested positive by either test were sequentially monitored. RESULTS: At baseline, point prevalence of viral carriage was 11.4% in HCWs (n = 44/386) and 11.9% in NHCWs (86/725). The cumulative prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs considering all studies was 25.6%, which was statistically lower than in NHCWs (41.0%). Prevalence was greatest among janitorial staff (45.9%) and the most affected departments were gastroenterology (31.1%), and emergency medicine (30.0%). Prior anosmia, fever or headache were associated with higher odds of positivity for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Regarding serial antibody measurements, RT-PCR-positive HCWs displayed IgG detection rates of 29.5%, 70% and 60% at visit 1, visit 2 and visit 3, respectively with slow decline of median IgG antibody titers, whereas, corresponding detection rates for total Ig antibodies were 50%, 90.3%, and 88.9%, respectively with increasing median titers. NAbs measured at each time point were positively correlated with total Ig levels, whereas IgG levels were positively correlated with NAbs at visit 1 and visit 3. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate lower cumulative prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in HCWs than general population and suggest that asymptomatic HCWs exhibit considerable IgG and total Ig antibodies response as well as NAbs for up to 120 days, with positive correlation in between.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibody Formation , Health Personnel , Hospitals, University , Humans , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Seroepidemiologic Studies
2.
J Clin Virol ; 134: 104710, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33276180

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) represent a high-risk category during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic crisis, with frontline HCWs at emergency departments (EDs) may be at an even higher risk. Determining the spread of infection among HCWs may have implications for infection control policies in hospitals. This study aimed to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among asymptomatic HCWs of the ED of a large tertiary center in Cairo, Egypt. METHODS: The study was conducted from June 1st to June 14th, 2020. All the recommended national and international indications on infection control measures were followed. Two hundred and three HCWs were included in the study and tested by nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) and rapid serological test (RST). Descriptive statistical analyses were used to summarize the data. RESULTS: Of the 203 HCWs, 29 (14.3 %) tested positive by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Thirty-seven (18.2 %) HCWs tested positive with RST: 20 with both IgM and IgG; 14 with IgM only, and 3 with IgG only. Age, gender, and/or occupation were not risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSIONS: Point prevalence of COVID-19 in asymptomatic HCWs in ED of tertiary care facility is 14.3 % by RT-PCR. This illustrates the importance of screening all HCWs regardless of symptoms, and the need for strict measures in securing HCWs to reduce transmission from healthcare facilities to the community during the current pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Tertiary Healthcare/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Asymptomatic Diseases , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Egypt/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Female , Health Personnel/psychology , Hospitals, University , Humans , Incidence , Infection Control/organization & administration , Male , Middle Aged , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Tertiary Healthcare/organization & administration
3.
Arab J Gastroenterol ; 21(3): 151-155, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732168

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Frontlines healthcare workers (HCWs) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are at increased risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2, but there are limited data on the prevalence of COVID-19 among HCWs in Egypt. This study aimed to assess SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs providing gastroenterological services. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventy-four HCWs at the gastroenterological service of Al-Manial University Hospital, the main hospital of the largest tertiary university hospitals complex in Egypt (Kasr Al-Ainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University) were tested using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on nasopharyngeal samples, and rapid serological IgM/IgG tests (RST). A questionnaire was used to collect demographic, occupational and clinical data. RESULTS: Of the 74 HCWs, 10 tested positive by RT-PCR (13.5%). In 9/74 (12.2%) HCWs, antibodies could be detected by RST: three with both IgM and IgG lines; six with IgM line only and none with IgG line only. Frequency of positive tests was more among subjects with minor symptoms compared to completely asymptomatic HCWs (50% vs 16.1%, respectively). Neither age, gender or occupation was a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSIONS: Point prevalence of COVID-19 in gastroenterology HCWs is 13.5% by RT-PCR. Continued measures are warranted to assure HCWs safety and reduce transmission from healthcare settings to the community during COVID-19 pandemic. Presence of positive test results among asymptomatic HCWs illustrates the importance of screening all HCWs irrespective of symptoms.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Gastroenterology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers , Adult , COVID-19 , Egypt , Female , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
4.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 44(2): 464-472, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30171294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Role of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography, in transplant setting, is not well established. We aimed to define the normal mean values of the liver stiffness by ARFI Elastography in healthy liver donors and to evaluate ARFI elastography as predictor of graft fibrosis post living donor liver transplant (LDLT) in comparison to other non-invasive methods (transient elastography [TE], APRI and FIB4). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 subjects (70 recipients and 30 donors) were recruited. APRI and FIB4 scores were calculated for all recipients. TE and ARFI elastography (Siemens Acuson S2000 Ultrasound System, Germany) were performed to all subjects. All donors and only 30 recipients had liver biopsy. Significant fibrosis was defined as ≥ F2. RESULTS: The mean ARFI velocity among the donors was 1.05 ± 0.09 m/s. Regarding the recipients: mean age was 49.5 ± 8.49 years, 85.7% males, fibrosis stages < F2 were the most frequent stages by liver biopsy (86.7%) and TE (67.1%). ARFI median was significantly correlated with TE median, APRI and FIB-4 (r = 0.888, p = 0.000; r = 0.62, p = 0.000, and r = 0.585, p = 0.000, respectively). ARFI performed well in discriminating patients with ≥ F2 (AUROC = 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-0.99, p < 0.01) with best cutoff median value of 1.34 m/s (sensitivity 90%, specificity 82%). CONCLUSION: ARFI can be used as a reliable method in assessment of significant fibrosis post-LDLT.


Subject(s)
Elasticity Imaging Techniques/methods , Liver Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Liver Diseases/pathology , Liver Transplantation , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Fibrosis , Humans , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Liver/pathology , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
5.
J Med Virol ; 91(4): 668-676, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30549048

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Direct acting antiviral has offered treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence post liver transplantation (LT) with an all-oral regimen for short duration, excellent safety profile, and high sustained virological response (SVR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens in the real world among a cohort of Egyptian patients with recurrent HCV post living donor LT (LDLT). METHODS: Patients with HCV-G4 recurrence post-LDLT were recruited from National Committee of Control of Viral Hepatitis, Egypt, from November 2014 to May 2017. They received different SOF-based regimens according to the treatment protocols available during this period. Patients' outcome and Adverse effects (AE) were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred ninety patients (170 males, mean age 56.8 ± 7.9 years) were included. Calcineurin inhibitors were the main immunosuppression used (173 patients). Out of 190, 119 (62.6%) received SOF/ribavirin (RBV), 38 (20%) SOF/simeprevir (SMV), 22 (11.6%) SOF/daclatasvir (DSV)/ ± RBV, and 11 (5.8%) received SOF/LDV/ ± RBV. Overall SVR12 was 89.5%, 84.9% in SOF/RBV group, 94.7% in SOF/SMV, 100% in SOF/DCV, and 100% in SOF/LDV with no statistically significant difference ( P = 0.104). The AE reported were as follows: anemia (n = 65, 34.4%) mainly in SOF/RBV group, transient hyperbilirubinemia during SOF/SMV in 13 patients (34%), mild Acute cellular rejection in eight patients (4.2%), and hepatocellular carcinoma in two patients (1%) mainly driven by underlying liver condition. Two deaths were unlikely related to HCV therapy. CONCLUSION: Different SOF-based regimens were effective with high SVR12 rates in a difficult-to-treat population, recurrent HCV post LDLT.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Liver Transplantation , Sofosbuvir/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Egypt , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Sofosbuvir/adverse effects , Sustained Virologic Response , Transplant Recipients , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...