Long-Term Outcome of Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Functional Non-Retentive Fecal Incontinence in Children.

BACKGROUND: Functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI) is a psychologically upsetting and embarrassing issue and affects children's quality of life negatively. AIM OF THIS STUDY: Evaluation of the short and long-term effect of Bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (BTPTNS) in the treatment of FNRFI in children and its impact on the quality of life (QoL). Methodology: The current randomized controlled study included 94 Children with FNRFI who were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group A received BTPTNS and Group B Received Sham BTPTNS. Follow-up was planned for 24 months for manometric findings, incontinence score, Incontinence episodes, and the QoL. RESULTS: The incontinence score was significantly decreases in Group A more than what was reported in Group B at 6, 12, 24 months follow up . In group A 53.2% of the included children who received BTPTNS showed a decrease in the incontinence episodes more than 75% and among them, 23.4% were fully continent. All the QoL domains were significantly improved in Group A after 6, 12, and 24 months when compared with Group B. CONCLUSION: BTPTNS can be a good modality in the treatment of FNRFI with favorable long-term maintenance of its effect together with a remarkable positive impact on all domains of QoL.

Biofeedback versus bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of functional non-retentive fecal incontinence in children: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Biofeedback and transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPTNS) can be used in treatment of Functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI). Aim of this study was to evaluate the early effect of Biofeedback versus (TPTNS) and treatment by Kegal exercises and dietetic regulations in management of (FNRFI) in children. METHODOLOGY: The current prospective randomized controlled study included 93 children with FNRFI who were randomly allocated into the 3 groups. Group A (n = 28) were treated by dietetic regulation and Kegal exercises. Group B (n = 34) received biofeedback while group C (n = 31) received (TPTNS) for 3 months. Follow up using St' Mark's incontinence score and high resolution manometry was done at 3 and 6 months and compared to the initial records. RESULTS: There was statistically significant decrease in the incontinence score in Group B and C compared to Group A at 3 and 6 months (p ˂ 0.001). Resting and squeeze pressures showed significant increase group B and C (p ˂ 0.001). Patients in Group B and C showed significant decrease volume of balloon required for 1st sensation (p ˂ 0.001 and 0.034) respectively. CONCLUSION: Biofeedback is more effective than TPTNS, Kegal exercises and dietetic regulations in treatment of FNRFI in children for short term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment Study.

Predictive Factors of Positive Circumferential and Longitudinal Margins in Early T3 Colorectal Cancer Resection.

BACKGROUND: Malignant involvement of circumferential resection margin (CRM) and longitudinal resection margin (LRM) after surgical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) are associated with higher rates of recurrence and development of distant metastasis. This can influence the overall patient's prognosis. The aim of the current study was to identify pathological factors as predictors for the involvement of resection margins in early T3 CRC. Patients and Methods. Fifty patients radiologically diagnosed to have cT3a/b (CRC) were included in the study. After resection, the pathological examination was performed to identify patients with positive CRM and/or LRM. Relations between the different pathological parameters and the CMR and LRM involvements were assessed. RESULTS: Positive CRM was present in 17 cases (34%), while positive LRM was found in 6 cases (12%). The involvement of both margins was significantly associated with rectal tumors and tumors with infiltrative gross appearance, grade III, deeper invasion, and positive lymph node metastases. Also, there was a significant association between both margins' positivity and other pathological parameters as signet ring carcinoma, tumor budding, perineural and vascular invasion, high microvessel density (MVD), and sinusoidal vascular pattern, while the presence of necrosis and infiltrative advancing tumor front was significantly associated with CRM involvement only. The depth of tumor invasion and signet ring carcinoma were identified as independent predictor factors for positive CRM and LRM, respectively. CONCLUSION: Preoperative identification of these pathological parameters can be a guide to tailor the management plan accordingly.

Oncoplastic Volume Replacement for Breast Cancer: Latissimus Dorsi Flap versus Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap.

BACKGROUND: Volume replacement oncoplastic breast techniques have become one of the standard lines in the treatment of early breast cancer. They have better cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is one of the most commonly used flaps for these techniques. Although it shows satisfactory surgical outcomes, postoperative shoulder dysfunction is an obvious drawback. The aim of this study was to compare LD flap with thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap after breast-conserving surgery regarding surgical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and impact on shoulder function. METHODS: The study included 42 adult female patients with early breast cancer who were eligible for conservative breast surgery and immediate breast reconstruction. Patients were divided into 2 equal groups: group A where patients underwent immediate reconstruction using LD flap and group B where patients underwent reconstruction using TDAP flap. Follow-up was designed for 12 months for early outcome, patient satisfaction, and shoulder functions. RESULTS: The mean age of the included patients in group A and group B was 40.95 ± 5.06 and 40.33± 5.25 years, respectively. There was no significant difference in flap dimensions, postoperative complications, or cosmetic outcome in both groups. However, significantly less shoulder dysfunction was documented in cases of TDAP compared to LD flap at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: TDAP flap is as reliable a technique as LD flap regarding the feasibility, postoperative complications, and the cosmetic outcome with significantly better functional outcome of the shoulder.