Extraoral Versus Intraoral Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Management of Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement With Reduction.

: The present study was conducted to compare between extraoral and intraoral approach for botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection into the lateral pterygoid muscle (LPM) in patients suffering from anterior disc displacement with reduction (ADDWR).Fourteen patients suffering from ADDWR were included in this prospective cohort study. Patients were enrolled randomly into 2 groups according to injection approach; where extraoral used in group I, while intraoral approach used in group II. The LPM was injected with 20 IU BTX-A under electromyography (EMG) guidance. Postoperative evaluation of the patients included: mouth opening assessment, LPM tenderness, temporomandibular joint TMJ (clicking), and tenderness. The LPM insertional EMG activity was assessed. Also, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to evaluate disc position. Descriptive and inferential analysis was conducted to compare between groups.There was significant patient's convenience during injection and significant injection time reduction in group II. A slight decrease in mouth opening immediate post-injection followed by significant improvement from 8th weeks post-injection was reported in both approaches. There was a significant improvement in TMJ clicking from 1st-week post-injection with no group difference. The EMG assessment documented LPM hyperactivity pre-injection followed by significantly decreased muscle activity at 8 and 16 weeks post-injection without statistical difference. The MRI showed no change in disc position after injection. CONCLUSION:: The BTX-A injection into LPM is a simple technique that can be used with high success and low complication rate for treatment of ADDWR. The intraoral approach was superior to the extraoral concerning patient convenience and injection duration with no statistical difference regarding other clinical outcomes.

Serum 25(OH) vitamin D level and its relation to diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Egyptian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Some clinical studies demonstrated a significant association between vitamin D deficiency and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the correlation between serum levels of 25(OH) vitamin D and DPN in Egyptian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Sixty patients were known to have T2DM, which classified into the following: group I included 40 patients with DPN and group II included 20 diabetic patients, without DPN, compared with 30 apparently healthy subjects of matched age and sex as control group. Laboratory investigations including fasting and 2-h postprandial blood glucose levels, serum calcium, phosphorus, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile, serum 25(OH) vitamin D, and nerve conduction studies were carried out for every participant to detect the existence and severity of DPN. RESULTS: Vitamin D deficiency was found in 73.3% of T2DM groups and in 35% of control subjects with statistical significant differences (p < 0.005), and serum level of 25(OH) vitamin D in patients with DPN (21.09 ± 8.38) was less statistically significant than that in patients without DPN (31.12 ± 14.85) (p = 0.001). Mean serum level of 25(OH) vitamin D in patients with painless DPN (10.047 ± 8.12) was less significant than that in patients with painful DPN (18.14 ± 3.85), (p < 0.05). Regression analysis revealed that vitamin D deficiency is one of the independent risk factors of DPN, (OD, 0.914), (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Vitamin D deficiency has a significant role in the development and severity of DPN in Egyptian patients with T2DM.