Key Stakeholder Perceptions of Standard vs. Total Cost of Ownership: A Procurement Analysis for Orthopaedic-Powered Instruments.

This study compares standard procurement methodology (SPM) with total cost of ownership (TCO) methodology for the procurement of orthopaedic-powered instruments. The authors conducted semi-structured standardized interviews with key hospital procurement stakeholders following consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Of the 33 hospital procurement stakeholders interviewed, all (100%) reported that SPM would be easier to use than TCO. However, only six (18%) preferred SPM over TCO. Barriers to the adoption of TCO emerged as a theme. Creating TCO frameworks can help to simplify the process for procurement agents and facilitate its adoption in the healthcare sector.

Mixed reality visualization in shoulder arthroplasty: is it better than traditional preoperative planning software?

BACKGROUND: Preoperative traditional software planning (TSP) is a method used to assist surgeons with implant selection and glenoid guide-pin insertion in shoulder arthroplasty. Mixed-Reality (MR) is a new technology that uses digital holograms of the preoperative plan and guide-pin trajectory projected into the operative field. The purpose of this study was to compare TSP to MR in a simulated surgical environment involving insertion of guide-pins into models of severely deformed glenoids. METHODS: Eight surgeons inserted guide-pins into eight randomized three-dimensional-printed severely eroded glenoid models in a simulated surgical environment using either TSP or MR. In total, 128 glenoid models were used and statistically compared. The outcomes compared between techniques included procedural time, difference in guide-pin start point, difference in version and inclination, and surgeon confidence via a confidence rating scale. RESULTS: When comparing traditional preoperative software planning to MR visualization as techniques to assist surgeons in glenoid guide pin insertion, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of mean procedure time (P=0.634), glenoid start-point (TSP = 2.2 ± 0.2 mm , MR = 2.1 ± 0.1 mm; P=0.760), guide-pin orientation (P=0.586), or confidence rating score (P=0.850). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that there were no significant differences between traditional preoperative software planning and MR visualization for guide-pin placement into models of eroded glenoids. A perceived benefit of MR is the real-time intraoperative visibility of the surgical plan and the patient's anatomy; however, this did not translate into decreased procedural time or improved guide-pin position. Level of evidence: Basic Science Study; Biomechanics.

Short stem humeral components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: stem alignment influences the neck-shaft angle.

INTRODUCTION: Shorter humeral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) stems may reduce stress shielding, however, potentially carry the risk of varus/valgus malalignment. This radiographic study's purpose was to measure the incidence of stem malalignment and thus the realized neck-shaft angle (NSA). The hypothesis was that malalignment of the stem is a frequent postoperative radiographic finding. METHODS: Radiographs of an uncemented curved short stem RTSA with a 145° NSA were reviewed. The study group included 124 cases at a mean age of 74 (range 48-91) years. The humeral stem axis was measured and defined as neutral if the value fell within ± 5° of the longitudinal humeral axis. Angular values > 5° were defined as malaligned in valgus or varus. The filling ratio of the implant within the humeral shaft was measured at the level of the metaphysis (FRmet) and diaphysis (FRdia). RESULTS: The average humeral stem axis angle was 4 ± 3° valgus, corresponding to a true mean NSA of 149 ± 3°. Stem axis was neutral in 73% (n = 90) of implants. Of the 34 malaligned implants, 82% (n = 28) were in valgus (NSA = 153 ± 2°) and 18% (n = 6) in varus (NSA = 139 ± 1°). The average FRmet and FRdia were 0.68 ± 0.11 and 0.72 ± 0.11, respectively. A low positive association was found between stem diameter and filling ratios (r = 0.39; p < 0.001); indicating smaller stem sizes were more likely to be misaligned. CONCLUSION: Uncemented short stem implants may decrease stress shielding; however, approximately one quarter were implanted > 5° malaligned. The majority of malaligned components (86%) were implanted in valgus, corresponding to an NSA of > 150°. As such, surgeons must be aware that shorter and smaller stems may lead to axial malalignment influencing the true SA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective study.

Glenoid baseplate screw fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: does locking screw position and orientation matter?

BACKGROUND: The longevity of a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty prosthesis can be compromised by glenoid baseplate loosening. Circular baseplate designs can be secured with superoinferior (SI) locking screws and anteroposterior (AP) compression screws or vice versa (AP-locking and SI-compression screws). This biomechanical cadaveric study investigated screw position (locking screws SI vs. AP and compression screws AP and SI) and screw orientation (parallel vs. divergent) to determine quantitative differences in baseplate micromotion. METHODS: Ten paired fresh-frozen cadaveric scapulae (n = 20) were implanted with a standard circular baseplate (∅ = 29 mm). The specimens were randomized into SI-locking or AP-locking screw configurations with the screw orientation directed either parallel or angled divergently at 15°. This yielded a total of 4 groups for statistical comparison: SI-lockingparallel, SI-lockingdivergent, AP-lockingparallel, and AP-lockingdivergent, which were subjected to axial eccentric loading on the implanted baseplates, similar to the American Standard of Testing of Materials standard for shoulder joint arthroplasty. RESULTS: In both static and cyclic testing, there were no statistically significant differences (P = .6) in micromotion between SI-locking (2.9 ± 0.8 µm) and AP-locking (3.5 ± 1.5 µm) configurations. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences (P = .2) in the divergent screw orientation group (2.0 ± 0.7 µm) vs. the parallel group (4.0 ± 1.5 µm). CONCLUSION: All configurations of screw position and screw orientation tested in a circular reverse baseplate have similar time-zero fixation in an intact glenoid bone model. In addition, the resultant micromotions for all configurations tested fell far below the 150 µm threshold for bone ongrowth.

Type E2 glenoid bone loss orientation and management with augmented implants.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was 2-fold: (1) to quantify type E2 bone loss orientation and its association with rotator cuff fatty infiltration and (2) to examine reverse baseplate designs used to manage type E2 glenoids. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 40 patients with type E2 glenoids were examined for pathoanatomic features and erosion orientation. The rotator cuff fatty infiltration grade was compared with the erosion orientation angle. To compare reconstructive options in light of the pathoanatomic findings, virtual implantation of 4 glenoid baseplate designs (standard, half wedge, full wedge, and patient-matched) was conducted to determine the volume of bone removal for seating and impingement-free range of motion. RESULTS: The mean type E2 erosion orientation angle was 47° ± 17° from the 0° superoinferior glenoid axis, resulting in the average erosion being located in the posterosuperior quadrant directed toward the 10:30 clock-face position. The type E2 neoglenoid, on average, involved 67% of the total glenoid surface (total surface area, 946 ± 209 mm2; neoglenoid surface area, 636 ± 247 mm2). The patient-matched baseplate design resulted in significantly (P ≤ .01) less bone removal (200 ± 297 mm3) for implantation, followed by the full-wedge design (1228 ± 753 mm3), half-wedge design (1763 ± 969 mm3), and standard (non-augmented) design (4009 ± 1210 mm3). We noted a marked difference in erosion orientation toward a more superior direction as the subscapularis fatty infiltration grade increased from grade 3 to grade 4 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The average type E2 erosion orientation was directed toward the 10:30 clock-face position in the posterosuperior glenoid quadrant. This orientation resulted in the patient-matched glenoid augmentation requiring the least amount of bone removal for seating, followed by the full-wedge, half-wedge, and standard designs. Implant selection also substantially affected computationally derived range of motion in external rotation, flexion, extension, and adduction.

Density distribution of the type E2 glenoid in cuff tear arthropathy.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the cortical-like and cancellous bone density variations in superiorly eroded glenoids due to cuff tear arthropathy. The purpose of this study was to analyze regional bone density in type E2 glenoids. METHODS: Clinical shoulder computed tomography scans were obtained from 32 patients with a type E2 superior erosion (10 men and 22 women; mean age, 73 years). Measurement regions were organized into quadrants (superior, inferior, anterior, and posterior) and depth regions. The depth regions were incremented by 2 mm from 0 to 10 mm. A repeated-measures multiple analysis of variance was performed to assess differences and interactions between mean densities (cortical-like and cancellous bone) in each depth, in each quadrant, and between sexes. RESULTS: The lowest cancellous bone density was found in the inferior glenoid quadrant compared with all other quadrants (307 ± 50 Hounsfield units [HU], P < .001). At the glenoid surface, the superior quadrant contained the highest mean density for cortical-like bone (895 ± 97 HU); this differed significantly from the posterior, anterior, and inferior quadrants (P ≤ .033). As for depth of measurement, cortical-like bone was most dense at the glenoid surface (0-2 mm, 892 ± 91 HU), and density decreased significantly at depths greater than 2 mm (P ≤ .019). CONCLUSION: In patients with type E2 glenoids due to cuff tear arthropathy, the densest bone was found in the superior quadrant in the area of erosion. The inferior quadrant, which tends to be unloaded as the humeral head migrates superiorly, had the lowest density bone. In addition, the best-quality bone was located at the glenoid surface as compared with deeper in the vault.

Acute locked superior shoulder dislocation in a patient with cuff tear arthropathy.

In the field of traumatic shoulder dislocations, this report of a 61-year-old female patient discusses the case of an acute locked superior shoulder dislocation in conjunction with a chronic rotator cuff arthropathy resulting from a low-energy fall on the outstretched and abducted arm. Radiological assessment revealed a complex combination of associated bony injuries including a fracture of the upper part of the glenoid and an impaction fracture of the inferior articular surface of the humeral head. Closed reduction and immobilisation were not successful in obtaining joint stability. This unique report highlights the clinical importance of accurate management of bony injuries in traumatic shoulder dislocation.