Bias and uncertainty of the International Normalized Ratio determined with a whole blood point-of-care prothrombin time test device by comparison to a new International Standard for thromboplastin.

BACKGROUND: Whole blood point-of-care PT/INR test devices, e.g. CoaguChek XS, are calibrated by their manufacturers. In the Netherlands, each new lot of test strips for CoaguChek XS is validated by a group of anticoagulant clinics collaborating with a Coagulation Reference Laboratory. In 2017, a new International Standard for recombinant human thromboplastin (coded rTF/16) has been established by the World Health Organization. AIM: To assess uncertainty of the validation procedure and the magnitude of the INR bias of a series of consecutive lots of test strips imported in the Netherlands. METHODS: CoaguChek XS test strip INR results were compared to INRs determined with the new International Standard rTF/16. Comparisons were made with variable numbers of blood samples obtained from patients treated with vitamin K-antagonists. Relationships between CoaguChek XS and rTF/16 results were determined with orthogonal regression analysis. The relationships were used to assess bias and uncertainty of bias. RESULTS: Average bias between CoaguChek XS test results and rTF/16 depends on the INR level. Overall, there was a trend of increasing bias and increasing uncertainty with increasing INR values. Along the sequence of 47 consecutive lots, a temporary fluctuation of bias was observed. At an INR level of 3.0 the average bias was less than 10% in all cases, but at an INR of 4.0 there were 5 lots with average bias between 10 and 15%. CONCLUSION: Validation of test strips is useful to assess bias but depends on availability of fresh patients' samples and traceability to an accepted Reference Measurement System.

Paving the way for establishing a reference measurement system for standardization of plasma prothrombin time: Harmonizing the manual tilt tube method.

BACKGROUND: International normalized ratio (INR) is traceable to World Health Organization (WHO) International Standards for thromboplastins. International Standards must be used with a manual tilt tube technique (MTT) for prothrombin time (PT) determination. An important part of the total variability of INR is due to poor harmonization of MTT across WHO reference laboratories. OBJECTIVES: To determine the origins of PT differences between operators performing MTT and to develop a harmonized MTT. METHODS: Two workshops were held where WHO reference laboratory operators could compare their PTs using MTT and the same equipment. A harmonized MTT was used by seven operators in the second workshop. RESULTS: Differences have been observed in tilting frequency and in the height of pipetting plasma in the test tube. At the beginning of the first workshop, the tilting cycle time varied between 1.1 and 2.7 seconds. The mean PT of normal plasma obtained by pipetting plasma at the top of the tube was 14.3 seconds but was 12.9 seconds when plasma was pipetted at the bottom of the tube. When using the harmonized MTT for WHO International Standard rTF/16, the differences between operators were not greater than 1.1 seconds in normal plasma, and not greater than 1.3 seconds in patient plasma with average INR of 3.0. INR between-operator coefficient of variation was 2.3%. CONCLUSION: Application of a harmonized MTT in three reference laboratories resulted in substantial reduction of between-operator variation of PT and INR. The harmonized MTT is proposed as Candidate Reference Measurement Procedure.

Accuracy assessment of consecutive test strip lots for whole blood INR point-of-care instruments: clarifying the role of frozen plasma pools.

Background In the Netherlands, each new lot of test strips for the CoaguChek XS is validated by a group of collaborating centers. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the international normalized ratio (INR) measured with consecutive test strip lots and the suitability of frozen plasma pools for accuracy evaluation. Methods Each year, a particular lot of CoaguChek XS test strips is used as reference lot. The reference lots have been validated with the International Standard for thromboplastin rTF/09, yielding a mathematical relationship (R1) between reference lot INR and International Standard INR. New lots are compared to the reference lot using patients' capillary blood samples, yielding a relationship (R2) between the new lot INR and the reference lot INR. INRs of the blood samples were within the 1.5-4.5 interval. In parallel, three frozen plasmas pools are analyzed with the test strips. The distance of each plasma point to the line of relationship R2 was assessed. Results Fifty-four test strip lots have been evaluated during 3 years (2014-2016). Mean INR differences between test strip lot and International Standard rTF/09 varied between -0.14 and +0.20 (-4% and +8%, respectively). A positive trend with strip lot sequence number was observed (p<0.001). In several cases, the distance of the frozen plasmas to the whole blood relationship (R2) was greater than the critical value for commutability. Conclusions Using whole blood, all evaluated test strip lots met the analytical bias criterion of ±10%. Frozen plasma pools behave differently compared to whole blood and are not suitable for assessing absolute accuracy of new CoaguChek XS test strips.

Preparation of control blood for external quality assessment of point-of-care international normalized ratio testing in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to prepare control blood for an external quality assessment scheme (EQAS) for international normalized ratio (INR) point-of-care testing (POCT) in the Netherlands and to assess the performance of the participants. METHODS: Control blood was prepared from dialyzed pooled patient plasma and washed human erythrocytes. Samples of control blood were mailed to participants of the Netherlands EQAS from October 2006 through December 2012. RESULTS: Most participants used CoaguChek XS (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) devices for POCT. The median between-center coefficient of variation (CV) of the reported INR decreased from 4.5% in 2006 to 2.6% in 2012. A few participants used the ProTime Microcoagulation System (ITC, Edison, NJ) for POCT. The median CV (per year) of the INR with the latter system was 7.0% to 10.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The control blood samples were useful for external quality assessment in the Netherlands. The participants' performance with the CoaguChek XS system improved with time, demonstrating the value of external quality assessment.