A Scoping Review of Different Methods of Assessing the Impact of New Medical Technologies at Early Stages of Development.

Background: Investing in the R & D sector of new medical technologies is associated with the risk of being rejected by paying organizations because of the lack of value-for-money. The purpose of this study is to investigate the different methods of evaluating the impacts of emerging medical technologies. Methods: Using scoping review method, we analyzed studies that investigated methods for assessing the impacts of emerging medical technologies on development. To find these studies, the Cochran Library, ISI Web of Knowledge, Embase, Ebsco and Pubmed databases from 2000 to 2018 were searched. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the STROBE Checklist. Two reviewers independently selected the qualified studies. Charting and collating the data were used based on the method proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. Results: Overall, 38 studies met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen methods were identified and put in five distinct categories: forecasting, Pro-HTA, Early-HTA, priority setting, and HHS were found to measure the impact of emerging technologies. The quality of these studies was acceptable. Few studies were conducted on emerging pharmaceutical technologies, and they were mostly on emerging medical devices. The Early HTA methods were often used to measure the effects of pharmaceutical technologies and medical devices technologies. The Pro-HTA method used dynamic modeling to examine the impact of medical technologies on a broad range of dimensions, while the HTA and Early-HTA methods used cost-effectiveness techniques throughout the development process. The HHS method used a multivariate decision-making technique. Conclusion: Different methods were used to investigate the impacts of emerging medical technologies. Chronologically Pro-HTA methods are new ways for investigating emerging medical technologies beyond clinical and economic impacts. Assessing the feasibility of implementing Pro-HTA in real environments deserves further research.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and the Cost of Care for Mucopolysaccharidosis I Patients in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Mucopolysaccharidosis I (MPS-I) is one of the most common types of MPS and lysosomal storage diseases, which impose considerable amount of economic burden on society. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the cost drivers in the treatment of MPS-I patients in Iran. METHODS: This is a cost-analysis study. The prevalence approach was used to evaluate costs from the healthcare payer's perspective. The number of patients found to have α-L-iduronidase deficiency was identified using the national registry database of the Ministry of Health (MOH). The direct medical costs of the patients were evaluated. Prescriptions; medical interventions; inpatient, outpatient, and diagnostic services, and also their costs were extracted from the patient's profiles in Iran Food and Drug Administration (IFDA). The prices of the medical services were taken out from Iranian medical tariff book 2014-15. Data extraction was performed from January 2017 to March 2018. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were registered as MPS-I in MOH databases. The average annual healthcare cost for every patient was $87 971.99, 96.9% of which was allocated to medication therapy. Therapeutic and diagnostic services costs (2.4% and 0.7% correspondingly) were ranked second and third, respectively, but with huge differences in medication cost. CONCLUSIONS: The average annual cost of treatment for MPS-I patients is as high as 16.2 times the GDP per capita in Iran. The highest share of the cost belongs to medication. Selecting appropriate strategies for reducing the birth of a child with MPS could support allocative efficiency of the limited resources effectively.

Cost analysis of childhood asthma in Iran: A cost evaluation based on referral center data for asthma and allergies.

OBJECTIVE: Asthma as the most common chronic disease in childhood reduces the quality of life of children and their families. We aimed to estimate the cost of managing childhood asthma in Iran and to examine its variability depending on asthma severity. METHODS: The cost of asthma was estimated by building a cost assessment model regarding the factors that influence the cost of asthma in children including age and sex distribution, prevalence of disease severity, level of resource utilization depending on disease severity (3 groups of controlled, partly controlled and uncontrolled were defined). The model was comprised of both medical (cost of medication, physician visit and respiratory tests) and non-medical (transportation and hoteling) costs. Furthermore, the average family income in each category was figured and the share of asthma managing costs from the average income was calculated in different groups. FINDINGS: According to model, the total cost of childhood asthma in Iran was around 516.5 million dollars. Moreover, direct medical cost represented 49% of the total costs, among which 66% accounting for medication cost. Direct non-medical costs were estimated 51% with the majority (93%) expended on transportation. In addition, the mean annual cost per child was approximately 466 dollars. In addition, the results indicate the vast majority of patients (46%) are categorized in the uncontrolled group. CONCLUSION: The cost of childhood asthma in Iran is extremely high comparing to the average income of Iranian families in all categories of asthma severity. Considering the high amount of transportation cost, the accessibility of asthma treatment does not appear to be acceptable. The major source of costs is found to be related to medicine expenditure. Since it has been proven that using medicine does not necessarily result in a well-controlled disease status, alternative approaches should be considered in asthma management.