Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 97(5): E627-E635, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33058477

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is paucity of data focusing on females' outcomes after the use of impeller pumps percutaneous ventricular assist devices (IPVADs). METHODS: Patients who received IPVADs during the period of October 1st, 2015-December 31, 2017, were identified from the United States National Readmission Database. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to compare the outcomes between females and males. RESULTS: A total of 19,278 (Female = 5,456; Male = 13,822) patients were included in the current analysis. After propensity score matching and among all-comers who were treated with IPVADs, females had higher in-hospital major adverse events (MAEs) (38 vs. 32.6%, p < .01), mortality (31 vs. 28%, p < .01), vascular complications (3.3 vs. 2.1%, p < .01), major bleeding (7.8 vs. 4.8%, p < .01), nonhome discharges (21.6 vs. 16.3%; p < .01), and longer length of stay (7 days [IQR 2-12] vs. 6 days [IQR 2-12], p = .02) with higher 30-day readmission rate compared to males (20.5 vs.16.4%, p < .01). Furthermore, among patients who received the IPVADs for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI), females continued to have worse MAEs, which was driven by high rates of major bleeding. However, among patients who received IPVADs for cardiogenic shock (CS) the outcomes of females and males were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Among all-comers who received IPVADs, females suffered higher morbidity and mortality compared to males. Higher morbidity driven mainly by higher rates of major bleeding was seen among females who received IPVADs for the hemodynamic support during HRPCI and comparable outcomes were observed when the IPVADs were used for CS.


Subject(s)
Drug-Eluting Stents , Heart-Assist Devices , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Female , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Sex Factors , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
3.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 35(9): 1651-1659, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31053980

ABSTRACT

We investigated the influence of the extent of viability using low dose dobutamine wall motion score index (WMS) on the survival benefit of surgical revascularization (CABG) versus medical therapy. In the STICH trial, viability assessment was not helpful in determining the benefit of CABG. However, the extent of viable myocardium with contractile function was not assessed in the trial. Dobutamine echocardiography was performed in 250 patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (125-medically treated, 125-CABG). The mean ejection fraction (EF) was 32% in both groups. WMS during low dose dobutamine infusion was used to classify patients into groups with extensive (WMS < 2.00), intermediate (WMS 2.00-2.49), and limited (WMS ≥ 2.50) viability. Survival free of cardiac death was assessed at 2 years and for the complete duration of follow-up. There were 44 (35.2%) and 67 (53.6%) cardiac deaths in the revascularized and medically treated patients respectively (follow-up of 5.7 ± 5.8 years). Revascularized and medically treated patients with extensive viability had similar 2-year survival (p = 0.567) but revascularized patients had improved long-term survival (p = 0.0001). In those with intermediate viability, revascularization improved both 2 year (p = 0.014) and long-term survival (p = 0.0001). In patients with limited viability, 2-year survival was worse in revascularized patients (p = 0.04) and long-term survival was similar (p = 0 .25) in revascularized and medically treated groups. Patients with extensive and intermediate amounts of viability have improved survival with CABG but those with limited viability have poorer short-term outcome and no long-term benefit.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies/diagnostic imaging , Cardiotonic Agents/administration & dosage , Coronary Artery Bypass , Dobutamine/administration & dosage , Echocardiography, Stress/methods , Myocardial Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Function, Left , Aged , Cardiomyopathies/mortality , Cardiomyopathies/physiopathology , Cardiomyopathies/surgery , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Clinical Decision-Making , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Ischemia/mortality , Myocardial Ischemia/physiopathology , Myocardial Ischemia/surgery , Myocardium/pathology , Patient Selection , Predictive Value of Tests , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Tissue Survival , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/mortality , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/surgery
4.
JACC Case Rep ; 1(1): 59-61, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34316744

ABSTRACT

The authors report a case of 85-year-old male undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), whose intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram was concerning for ascending aortic dissection. Further imaging, however, delineated this to be an aortic valve tendon and the TAVR was accomplished successfully. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...