Outcomes of chest drain management using only air leak (without fluid) criteria for removal after general thoracic surgery-a drainology study.

Background: Chest drain management is a variable aspect of postoperative care in thoracic surgery, with different opinion for air and drain volume output. We aim to study if acceptable safety was maintained using air leak criteria alone. Methods: A 9-year retrospective analysis of protocolised chest drain management using digital drain air leak cut off less than 20 mL/min for more than 6 h for drain removal in patients undergoing general thoracic surgery. We excluded patients if a chest drain was not required nor removed during admission or if patients underwent volume reduction or pneumonectomy. Withdrawal criteria were suspected bleeding or chylothorax. Postoperative films were reviewed to document post-drain removal pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and reintervention (drain re-insertion). Results: Between 2012 and 2021, 1,187 patients had thoracic surgery under a single surgeon. Following exclusion and withdrawal criteria, 797 patients were left for analysis. The mean age [standard deviation (SD)] was 61 [16] years and 383 (48%) were male. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] duration of drain insertion was 1 [1-2] day with a median length of hospital stay of 4 [2-6] days. Post-drain removal pneumothorax was observed in 141 (17.7%), post-drain removal pleural effusion was observed in 75 (9.4%) and re-intervention (reinsertion of chest drain) required in 17 (2.1%). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate acceptable levels of safety using digital assessment of air leak as the sole criteria for drain removal in selected patients after general thoracic surgery.

Are chest drains routinely required after thoracic surgery? A drainology study of on-table chest-drain removals.

Objectives: Advances in perioperative management for thoracic surgery have accelerated the postoperative recovery of patients by decreasing postoperative pain and the incidence of complications. We aimed to study whether it's safe to remove chest drains on table in selected cases. Methods: This was a 5-year retrospective analysis of protocolized chest-drain removal on the operating table. The chest drain was removed in patients undergoing sublobar/wedge lung resection and other minor thoracic procedure (pleural biopsy, mediastinal mass biopsy/resection) via a thoracoscopic approach (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery). Chest drains were removed at the end of the operation if air leak as documented by the digital drain was less than 20 mL/min. Outcome data on postdrain removal pneumothorax, effusion, and need for further intervention were obtained by reviewing the postoperative chest films, all reported by a radiologist. Results: Between 2016 and 2021, 107 patients underwent drain removal in theater. Mean age (standard deviation) was 58 (17) years and 54 (50.5%) were male. Postdrain removal pneumothorax occurred in 22 patients (21%), pleural effusion in 6 (5.6%), and 21 of 22 postoperative pneumothoraces were managed conservatively without reinsertion of chest drain. As it is our standard policy to leave no pneumothorax in patients undergoing surgical management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax, only 1 such patient (0.9%) had a drain reinserted as a result. The median (interquartile) length of hospital stay was 1 day (1-2), and 14 patients (13%) were discharged on surgery day. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that on table chest-drain removal in selected cases is safe and repeatable using a digital drain, challenging the practice of routine drain insertion after thoracic surgery.

Prognostic Value of Cardiovascular Biomarkers in COVID-19: A Review.

In early December 2019, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) first emerged in Wuhan, China. As of May 10th, 2020, a total of over 4 million COVID-19 cases and 280,000 deaths have been reported globally, reflecting the raised infectivity and severity of this virus. Amongst hospitalised COVID-19 patients, there is a high prevalence of established cardiovascular disease (CVD). There is evidence showing that COVID-19 may exacerbate cardiovascular risk factors and preexisting CVD or may lead to cardiovascular complications. With intensive care units operating at maximum capacity and such staggering mortality rates reported, it is imperative during this time-sensitive COVID-19 outbreak to identify patients with an increased risk of adverse outcomes and/or myocardial injury. Preliminary findings from COVID-19 studies have shown the association of biomarkers of acute cardiac injury and coagulation with worse prognosis. While these biomarkers are recognised for CVD, there is emerging prospect that they may aid prognosis in COVID-19, especially in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities or risk factors that predispose to worse outcomes. Consequently, the aim of this review is to identify cardiovascular prognostic factors associated with morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 and to highlight considerations for incorporating laboratory testing of biomarkers of cardiovascular performance in COVID-19 to optimise outcomes.

Retrospective analysis of tricuspid valve repair using a novel surgical technique: A 7-year single-surgeon experience.

OBJECTIVES: Tricuspid annuloplasty is the optimal surgical repair technique for tricuspid regurgitation which improves mortality and morbidity. Ring annuloplasties is the techniques of choice. Here, we evaluate the efficacy and durability of a new method of interrupted pledgeted suture annuloplasty. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2018, 39 eligible patients underwent tricuspid valve repair using this novel technique. Indication for repair was a grade of regurgitation at moderate or greater, or an annular diameter >40 mm. Patients were assessed both preoperatively and postoperatively by echocardiogram. Follow-up results were split into the first postoperative echocardiogram and most recent postoperative echocardiogram undertaken. RESULTS: There were two in-hospital mortalities and two patients required permanent pacemaker implantation following surgery. At the time of the first postoperative echocardiogram undertaken (median 3 months postoperatively), freedom from moderate-severe regurgitation was 92.3%. At the time of the most recent postoperative echocardiogram undertaken (median 11 months postoperatively); none or mild regurgitation was detected in 24 patients (61.5%), mild-moderate in 11 (28.2%) and moderate-severe in 4 (10.3%) patients. Freedom from moderate-severe regurgitation was 89.7%. Postoperative grade of regurgitation was significantly reduced from preoperative grades (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Initial and midterm results of our technique show a good durability of repair. We have demonstrated recurrence rates of regurgitation equal and superior to current forms of suture annuloplasty published in the literature. This novel method of suture annuloplasty can be considered in the surgical repertoire of tricuspid valve repair techniques.